You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
UN draft on Iran 'Softened'
2006-03-29
Western powers softened a draft U.N. Security Council statement on Tuesday on reining in Iran's nuclear ambitions in hopes of reaching a deal with Russia and China before all their foreign ministers meet this week. Still, the new draft, obtained by Reuters, retains calls on Tehran to suspend uranium-enrichment efforts, a process that can produce fuel necessary for making a nuclear bomb.

The text deletes language on several specific demands. Instead it refers only to the number of the resolution that contained them and was adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency board in Vienna, the U.N. nuclear watchdog.

Britain and France, authors of the draft backed by the United States, distributed the document, their third revision, to the full 15-nation U.N. Security Council for discussion on Wednesday, three weeks after talks began. The three Western nations hope to convince Russia and China to agree on the document, a day before foreign ministers of the five permanent members and Germany meet in Berlin on Thursday to map out strategy toward Iran.

Ambassadors from the United States, Britain, France, Russia and China, permanent council members with veto power, met three times on Tuesday on the Iran research programs, which Tehran says are for peaceful purposes but the West believes are a cover for atomic-bomb making.

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton and British Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry said there were still one or two issues outstanding. The main one was a provision that referred to weapons of mass destruction as a threat to international peace and security. Russia believes this could be a prelude to harsher punishment, diplomats said. Another unsolved issue, China said, was the how long the director of the IAEA, Mohamed ElBaradei had to report to the council on whether Iran had complied with its demands. The original text said 14 days while the new text refers to 30 days. Russia had proposed until June. China's U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya told reporters the timeline had not been agreed yet.
Posted by:Pappy

#6  I exaggerate, perhaps. My working assumptions are (1) there is nothing to be gained by military operations against Iranian nuclear infrastructure that leaves any Islamist regime in place; (2) the U.S. currently does not have the political capital necessary to move militarily against Iran whether or not the regime is left in place; (3) in contrast to Iraq, in which a solid majority of the population detested the Baath regime, the support for such regime change among the Iranian people is much softer. Finally, the (4) the U.S. (and perhaps no other country) is not very good at fighting limited war, yet Islamic fascism's success is a function of the West's unwillingness to confront low-damage operations like targeted assassinations of journalists and politicians, blowing up embassies, flying airplanes into buildings, and so on with an all-out assault on those who support such operations both tactically and financially. Effective retaliation is possible only given an attack of sufficient deadliness. The longer that we wait, the stronger and more ensconced Islamic fascism becomes. The best strategy is therefore to encourage an early attack.
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-03-29 15:36  

#5  
Yes, it now starts, "To whom it may concern."
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-03-29 13:55  

#4  Your theory strikes me as more than a bit queer, Perfessor. Elucidate, please.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-03-29 13:43  

#3  My theory is that the Bush administration wants Iran to acquire nukes, and as quickly as possible.
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-03-29 13:29  

#2  I think the US has decided to go with the flow in the UNSC and let it logjam as quickly as possible - to check off the box faster, this time. To deal with the chickenshit Senate, you still have to have that tissue for political cover though everyone, and I mean everyone, knows where this will end.

The international farce plays out.

Then the domestic one.
Posted by: Juse Thineth7708   2006-03-29 04:36  

#1  So soft, the final draft will be written on super soft facial tissue. Very flushable.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-03-29 02:00  

00:00