You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pelosi and Reid: We Be "Tougher and Smarter" Than the "R" Brand
2006-03-29
Eyeing House and Senate elections this fall, Democrats are stepping up their effort to cut into the public perception that Republicans are stronger on national security.

Congressional Democrats vow to provide U.S. agents with the resources to hunt down Osama bin Laden and ensure a "responsible redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq in 2006 in a national security policy statement House and Senate Democratic leaders were announcing Wednesday.

"We need a new direction on national security, and leaders with policies that are tough and smart. That is what Democrats offer," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in remarks prepared for delivery Wednesday.

His counterpart in the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Democrats were providing a fresh strategy _ "one that is strong and smart, which understands the challenges America faces in a post 9/11 world, and one that demonstrates that Democrats are the party of real national security."

Republicans criticized the statement as an election-year stunt.

"I trust in the common sense of the American people to see these efforts for what they are: misguided political attacks that are simply a bob-and-weave effort by those who have no real solutions or proposals of their own," Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said.

The Democratic statement lacks specific details of a plan to capture bin Laden, the al-Qaida chief who has evaded U.S. forces in the more than four years since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. But Democrats suggest they will double the number of special forces and add more spies to increase the chances of finding al-Qaida's elusive leader.

Democrats also do not set a deadline for when all of the 132,000 American troops now in Iraq should be withdrawn.

They say: "We will ensure 2006 is a year of significant transition to full Iraqi sovereignty, with the Iraqis assuming primary responsibility for security and governing their country and with the responsible redeployment of U.S. forces."

The latest in a series of party policy statements for 2006, the Democrats' national security platform comes seven months before voters decide who will control the House and Senate.

Bush's job approval ratings are in the mid- to high-30s, and Democrats consistently have about a 10 percentage point lead over Republicans when people are asked who they want to see in control of Congress.

With the public skeptical of the Iraq war and Republicans and Democrats alike questioning Bush's war policies, Democrats aim to force Republicans to distance themselves from the president on Iraq and national security or rubber-stamp what Democrats contend is a failed policy.

Democratic strategists say their polling shows Democrats leading in all other areas _ such as the economy, health care, education and retirement security _ and having closed a gap in polls with Republicans on national security.

Republicans characterized the Democrats' platform as tough election- year talk that isn't backed up by the party's record.

"This is more of the same from the party that opposes this president's effort to keep our country safe," said Tracey Schmitt, a Republican National Committee spokeswoman.

Overall, the Democratic position paper covers party policy positions on homeland security, the war on terror, the military, Iraq and energy security. However, it contains many of the same proposals Democrats have offered over the past year.

For months, House and Senate Democrats have tried to craft a comprehensive position on national security, but they have splintered, primarily over Iraq.

Republicans have sought to use that division to their own political advantage, claiming that Democrats simply attack the president and his fellow Republicans without presenting proposals of their own.

Posted by:Captain America

#19  The Dems remind me of my first attempt at writing a proposal for an engineering contract:

"We have done many fine and wonderful things. We have a great team of top notch specialists. We will develop and implement a sound plan that will meet your needs into the distant future. And because of the above, we are the best people for the job."
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-03-29 22:35  

#18  At least we'd find out how amphibious the tank really is.
Posted by: Phil   2006-03-29 22:30  

#17  I'll know they're serious when they have Ted Kennedy driving the tank in the ads. That would strike fear in anybody...

He wouldn't fit through the hatch - he'd get stuck like in the Winnie the Pooh story.
Posted by: xbalanke   2006-03-29 21:45  

#16  The Democrats don't believe Americans are stupid, they're counting on it.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-03-29 21:07  

#15  #11
But tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward,and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

Vote Kang!
Posted by: Master of Obvious

Spinning spinning spinning.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-03-29 20:58  

#14  Kirk - it'll be the only non-ironic use of "balls" and Democrats in the same sentence
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-29 20:52  

#13  I actually heard someone say in a puzzled manner, "Why are the democrats going against Obama?"
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-03-29 20:21  

#12  I'll know they're serious when they have Ted Kennedy driving the tank in the ads. That would strike fear in anybody...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-03-29 19:42  

#11  
But tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward,and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom.

Vote Kang!
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-03-29 19:20  

#10  Expect lots of Kerry-style "why haven't we captured bin Laden?, we took our eye off the ball" baloney between now and Nov. Hopefully with electoral results for the Dems similar to those of 2004.

I don't know what it is about libs that causes them to retry the same failed approaches over and over again, but, at least when it comes to politics, I'm sure happy they do.
Posted by: kirk   2006-03-29 19:06  

#9  I just had a vision of Reid drivin' a tank around similar to Dukakis. I'm seein' an extra large helmet pulled down over his brow. With Nancy reading a map upside down. They're serious damnit!! "You got a war face Nancy!!"
"Lemme see your war face!!"
Uncle Harry channeling R. Lee Emory.. It'll be the next comercial.

Oh, I just had a vision of Babble Boxer in a Gille suit as a sniper w/ Osama in her sights. Nice!!!
Posted by: macofromoc   2006-03-29 19:05  

#8  This is what Harry and Nancy are trying to tell Americans:



Posted by: Dave D.   2006-03-29 19:03  

#7  Wow. This is almost like Barney Fife and Maude teaming up to fight crime in our streets...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-03-29 18:50  

#6  
He's kinda like that little old guy from those Benny Hill reruns. As for Pelosi - well, does she even know where Pakistan is on the map?

No Nancy Pakistan isn't next to Saturn and Jupiter.
Posted by: macofromoc   2006-03-29 18:47  

#5  Yeah! We'll show these terrorists!
Hit'em with the position paper, Harry!
Posted by: Nancy"The Iron Lady" Pelosi   2006-03-29 18:25  

#4  feckless dingalings

Bwaahahaha! Pure perfection.

Bravo, Dave D.!
Posted by: Juse Thineth7708   2006-03-29 17:59  

#3  At least the poor darlings are trying. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-03-29 17:52  

#2  "...responsible redeployment of U.S. forces"

Let me guess: what that really means is "withdraw our troops to a safe place where they won't have to fight jihadis."

Am I right? Yup, I thought so. "Tough and smart." Uh-huh...

God have mercy on us if we're so stupid as to ever allow these feckless dingalings back in power. Because one thing is absolutely certain: if we do, the rest of the world won't show us any mercy.

Neither will history.

Posted by: Dave D.   2006-03-29 17:48  

#1  "We need a new direction on national security, and leaders with policies that are tough and smart."

Note to Dems: Harry Reid is about the last guy you want spouting stuff like that. He comes across about as tough and smart as a turnip.

/apologies to any root vegetables reading this.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2006-03-29 17:39  

00:00