You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
UAE somehow manages to forgive those who bribed Saddam
2006-04-05
ABU DHABI — Dismissing outright any suggestion of financial or ethical impropriety, a wide cross-section of businessmen and executives in the capital have asserted that UAE firms that allegedly paid millions of dollars in illegal kickbacks to ousted Iraqi president Saddam Hussein in the oil-for-food programme could not be held accountable.

A Khaleej Times expose of the mushrooming multi-billion dollar Iraqi oil-for-food scandal, published yesterday, had listed over 110 UAE firms (among many others worldwide) which contracted by Iraq to supply humanitarian goods, reportedly paid over $100 million in illegal kickbacks over a seven-year period to secure the corruption-ridden deals. These controversial allegations are categorically listed in the independent UN inquiry into the scandal, led by Paul A. Volcker.

Widely condemning the innuendo of complicity in a rash of corrupt deals, prominent businessmen and top executives in Abu Dhabi said yesterday, 'These are perfunctory ordeals in the realm of business transactions and do not involve issues of moral turpitude, and therefore cannot be dubbed as illicit income.' To the contrary, they argued, 'This is normal business practice worldwide.'
"Pshaw, it's nothing!"
Some of the contracts were subject to tax by the former Iraqi president and bidders supplying a variety of goods were left with no option but to fall in line, said a market analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity. 'By complying with the measures enforced, the business houses in the UAE had only contributed their mite to serve the local economy by bringing in more non-oil business to bolster the economy,” he observed. 'It is an unwritten law that such transactions are the order of routine business,' a leading businessman who wished to remain anonymous commented.
"It's not personal, it's business."
'The UAE economy is not impinged by these transactions, even if you give them the label of being 'illegal'. What is important is that the humanitarian assistance reached the millions of suffering masses in sanctions-hit Iraq and their purpose was to bail out these suffering people,” he added.
Worked well, didn't it?
'Morally or legally speaking, the only aggrieved party was the Iraqi people, although it could be discounted that it was the money of business houses here that went into some private hands,' the businessman added.

An executive, who also did not wish to be named, said that the UAE businessmen have only been victims of circumstances, as they were at the 'wrong place at the wrong time' and it was a complex Hobson's choice for them. 'Some businessmen with deep values for probity might have refrained from indulging in these deals, but that does not mean that those who did the business resorted to corrupt practices, was their general consensus', he said.
Nope, nothing at all corrupt about dealing with a genocidal dictator.
As Saddam had turned hostile to the US and the West, there was a wave of sympathy and indulgence that might have prompted a certain flexibility in the initiatives the business houses took, reasoned a corporate lawyer.

Another businessmen said the over-prolonged and uncompromising UN sanctions on Iraq which crippled the Iraqi economy and caused heavy damage to the socio-economic sector, had also led to a sympathy wave, which found its bleak aftermath in popular reaction. The war-ravaged scenario in Iraq had led to a set of new values that is difficult to fathom from a pure commercial point of view, which the west champions. 'On the whole, we do not attach undue importance to what is euphemistically termed as a 'bribe', as it can only be construed as a business transaction, on mutually agreed terms and conditions, and for mutual benefit, in the process,' many of the people interviewed by Khaleej Times observed.

'Basically the people behind this probe wanted to malign all those who got contracts from Iraqi government as they wanted to divert the attention and criticism of conscientious people over the West's criminal silence over the plight of Iraqi children and victims of sanctions,' an executive summed up succinctly.
And there you have it, business as usual, in the UAE and in much of the world.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Just sit tight, Koffi. Just sit tight!
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-04-05 18:27  

#4  
Good thing that port deal fell through. Just sayin'...
Posted by: Varun of Delhi   2006-04-05 17:41  

#3  Good deal.
How do I get it?
Posted by: K. Annan   2006-04-05 16:54  

#2  Well that's good. Saves them the time and trouble of going through all that "repenting" stuff, which is just soooooooo embarrassing...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-04-05 16:08  

#1  What a bunch of horse shit.
They were intentionally subverting UN sanctions against Saddam. End of story. There should be penalties.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-04-05 15:57  

00:00