You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
JaafariÂ’s rejection as PM final, says Kurds
2006-04-10
Iraqi Kurdish leaders have officially informed the main Shia Alliance that their rejection of Ibrahim al-Jaafari as the Alliance nomination for prime minister is final, political sources said on Sunday. The message was delivered by Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, who is also a top Kurdish leader, to a committee from the Alliance, the sources said.

The Alliance, under growing pressure to nominate a replacement to break a deadlock over a unity government, is expected to inform other political blocs of their final decision on Jaafari today (Monday), the sources said. Representatives from the seven factions of the United Iraqi Alliance, the Shia bloc, formed a three member committee to discuss the deadlock over Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari with the Sunni and Kurdish parties “to be more certain” of the reasons for their opposition, said Shia official Ridha Jawad Taqi earlier on Sunday.

A Shia official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue said al-Jaafari’s supporters within his Dawa party and the movement of radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr were still insisting on keeping the prime minister as the Shia nominee to head the next government. Sunni politician Saleh al-Mutlaq proposed that the new prime minister be chosen by consensus among all parties, a proposal the Shias are unlikely to accept. The constitution states that the largest bloc in parliament - the Shia alliance - has the right to nominate the prime minister subject to parliamentary approval. Al-Mutlaq said the new government should be made up of “independents, nationalists and technocrats from outside the current political parties.”

Al-Jaafari has refused to step down. Alliance leaders have been reluctant to force a move against him as long as Dawa and the al-Sadr group stick by their support. Such a move could lead to the breakup of the Shia alliance.
So the Shiite majority, in order to remain a majority, has to remain in thrall to the Shiite minority, led by Tater. That makes him the power broken and coincidentally protects him from getting a thorough thumping from the Americans or the Iraqis. I'm not sure what this says about the political skills of the players in Baghdad, but it's probably not very complimentary.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Speculation. They want to postpone the confrontation with Tater and the Tehran puppets till we attack Iran at which time they will be squashed for their Persian links under cover of our attack on Iran and Iran's counter-attack on Iraq. Better to take them out now militarily, better to take them out then politcially.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-04-10 08:37  

#1  Right ! In a country where people are killed for having the wrong religion or going to the market on the wrong day, why the hell are they jumping through hoops over this asshat Jaafari ?
Why not just kill the bastard if he won't get out of the way ? I don't get it. We know he's a pawn anyway. We know he's got Iran's interests at heart. Kill him and move on. His 15 minutes are up now.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-04-10 07:40  

00:00