You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Reports of US nuclear strike on Iran 'completely nuts': British FM
2006-04-10
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has dismissed claims that the United States was preparing for military action against Iran, including nuclear strikes on suspected atomic weapons facilities. He told BBC television that the international community was right to view the Islamic republic's nuclear programme with "high suspicion" but "there is no smoking gun, there is no 'casus belli' (justification for war)".

"We can't be certain about Iran's intentions and that is therefore not a basis for which anybody would gain authority to go to military action," he said Sunday. Straw was speaking following reports from the United States that President George W. Bush was studying options for military strikes, including possible targets. The April 17 edition of the New Yorker said they included Iran's underground uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and its uranium conversion facility at Isfahan. Straw dismissed the idea of nuclear strikes with bunker-busting bombs as "completely nuts" and questioned the reliability of the reports' source.
Posted by:Fred

#6  the international community was right to view the Islamic republic's nuclear programme with "high suspicion" but "there is no smoking gun, there is no 'casus belli'

Threats to "Wipe Israel off of the map" are not casus belli? WTF is this guy smoking? Probably not straw, regardless of his name. Iran has essentially declared war on America. Straw can sod off.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-04-10 11:52  

#5  The way straw has been acting, from the start of this, I wouldn't be suprised to learn that he has some serious money of his own tied up in Iran.
Posted by: Crairt Anginesing8770   2006-04-10 08:57  

#4  CA, good point.
Posted by: twobyfour   2006-04-10 00:32  

#3  One thing I don't understand is how Blair can stand the Straw man. Either there is really no one else available for the post, or the Straw man implements policy as defined by Blair. In both cases, God save Brits.
Posted by: twobyfour   2006-04-10 00:29  

#2  Now what would Jack Straw know about nuts?
Posted by: Captain America   2006-04-10 00:28  

#1  Of course it's nuts.

We don't need nukes to blow up their nukes.

Conventional will do just fine. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-04-10 00:18  

00:00