You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Lethal injection may cause agony: rights group
2006-04-24
Execution by lethal injection may cause excruciating pain, contradicting its reputation as a humane and thus publicly acceptable way to impose the death penalty, Human Rights Watch said.
Y'know, it's a funny thing, but murder also sometimes does that.
Executioners fail to take the steps needed to ensure a painless death and use a drug that veterinarians have deemed too cruel for putting down dogs and cats, the group said in a report released on Monday. However, a leading death penalty proponent dismissed the report as “blind speculation,” saying there was no evidence of someone being conscious and in agony during lethal injection.
I always thought they were put to sleep before being put down. That's what all the descriptions I've ever read have said. Maybe they lied to me.
Three steps after getting the IV line in:

1) An opiate, barbital or benzodiazepine to induce sedation.

2) A paralytic agent (e.g., pancuronium) to stop all skeletal muscle activity, and thus respiration. Pancuronium was used by veterinarians for euthanasia until recently, but the rule is you can't do that anymore -- you need to sedate the animal first. Hence the reference in this story.

3) Potassium chloride to stop the heart. Over to you, Dr. Quincy.
Human Rights Watch, which opposes the death penalty in all cases, issued the report amid increased scrutiny of lethal injections across America.
Does that mean they want murderers to stop inflicting the death penalty on their victims? Or they just want the state to stop putting murderers down like dogs?
A North Carolina man was executed by lethal injection on Friday by officials who, following a judgeÂ’s order, used a brain wave monitor to ensure he did not suffer undue pain.
I think we're jumping through a lot of hoops to make the departure of the depraved from the gene pool comfortable. I'm not in favor of cruelty, but I'm in favor of cleansing the body politic by disposing of those who can't control their impulses toward violence.
In other states such as Florida and California, executions have been delayed while courts consider whether the lethal injections cause agony. An execution in California was halted in February after the prison failed to find anesthesiologists willing to certify the inmate’s death was painless. “There is mounting evidence that prisoners may have experienced excruciating pain during their executions. This should not be surprising given that corrections agencies have not taken the steps necessary to ensure a painless execution,” Human Rights Watch said.
I've done plenty of euathanasia on lab animals using very similar methods, and never once was it painful.
Human Rights Watch does not endorse any alternative method but said as long as the death penalty is legal in the United States it wanted to enforce international human rights laws requiring the least possible suffering.
Just send them to the vet, then. They've got lots of experience.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Demonstrations before the Saudi and Chinese embassies in 3,2,1...

They can't raise funds using China and The Magic Kindgom.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-04-24 21:21  

#10  The good people of Utah generally tend to be much less than sympathetic to criminals, particularly murderous ones. I'd say it's about 80-20 solidly in favor of the death penalty. I'm sure that doesn't hurt in keeping the murder total down.
Posted by: mac   2006-04-24 17:50  

#9  Convicted murderer, Gary Gilmore's final words before being put to death on January 17, 1977, by a volunteer firing squad were --

"Let's do it!"

The countdown began. Gilmore appeared calm. There were three distinct shots. His head went forward into the strap, his right hand delicately lifted, then dropped. The spectators he'd requested to witness the event watched as blood flowed from his heart down his shirt and onto the floor. The doctor went forward to listen, and said that he was still alive. In twenty more seconds, it was over.

The sentence was carried out six months after the murders: on Monday January 17 1977, a few minutes after 8am local time, Gary Gilmore was executed by firing squad in a disused cannery in Utah State prison.

Justice was done.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-04-24 16:49  

#8  When Mr. Wife was doing cancer research, he always petted the mice before killing them. Perhaps the Human Rights Watch people would like to engage in analogous actions? (And no, I do not wish to speculate on what vicious murderers would consider analogous.)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-04-24 14:40  

#7  The problem with the current death penalty is that it gives 3-time losers no incentive to show leniency to their victims. I wonder whether moving to, say, a 3-tier system (hanging, firing squad, lethal injection) could allow one to apply the death penalty in, say, rape cases, while giving the rapist an incentive not to kill his victim. Of course, there's always torture, but I fear that this would be found unconstitutional even by the most conservative of jurists.
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-04-24 12:53  

#6  JFM, nah, they're not going to get their panties in a wad over China. China will blow them off, but they know they can always get an audience here.
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2006-04-24 08:38  

#5  I agree with WC R. If we execute poeple then it should be a punishment and hanging is both traditional and not a nice way to die. The death penalty is not supposed to be nice and painless.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-04-24 08:38  

#4  Enough of this crap. I want HANGINGS!
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2006-04-24 07:51  

#3  I've done plenty of euathanasia on lab animals using very similar methods, and never once was it painful.

high snark! LOL!
Posted by: RD   2006-04-24 06:25  

#2  Human Rights Watch does not endorse any alternative method but said as long as the death penalty is legal in the United States it wanted to enforce international human rights laws requiring the least possible suffering.

Demonstrations before the Saudi and Chinese embassies in 3,2,1...

BTW, China has been seeling the organs of the people sentenced to death to foreign buyers, something who creates a financial incentive for the regime... Expect HRW to scream sky high about it.
Posted by: JFM   2006-04-24 06:20  

#1  I hear a bullet to the base of the brain works.
Posted by: mojo   2006-04-24 01:28  

00:00