You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Muslim silence over Darfur regretted
2006-05-07
Tarek Fatah, a progressive Muslim activist from Toronto, has urged Muslims to raise their voice against the Darfur genocide. In an article published in the Globe and Mail, CanadaÂ’s most influential newspaper, Fatah, a Pakistani-Canadian, decries the position taken by many Muslims that the Jews have somehow stolen the issue of Darfur.
I had no idea the Jews collectively even know where Darfur is. There aren't any Jews there, and they're not even particularly interested in Sudan. Nobody ever says "Next year, in Khartoum."
He writes, “The fact that more than 200,000 Darfurians, almost all of them Muslims, have been killed in an ongoing genocide; the fact that more than a million Muslim Darfurians are displaced refugees living in squalor and fear, appears not to have registered with the leadership of traditional Muslim organisations and mosques in this country. One would have expected Muslim organisations to be leading the call for last week’s debate in (the Canadian) Parliament. One expected them … to stand in solidarity with their fellow Muslim organisations and mosques in the country.”
Darfur doesn't have a government, only three or four sometimes competing rebel groups. Khartoum has a full-fledged dictator, with big shoulder boards and a tin hat. Muslim organizations have a soft spot for that sort of thing.
Fatah is of the view that “some kind of Arabic-Islamic ideology” is being used in Sudan to ethnically cleanse marginalised citizens who are not considered true Muslims by virtue of being black.
I'd call it racism, though I can't recall having seen anyone else use the word, certainly not any Muslims. We have racism in this country, of course, though by now it usually takes a trained observer like Al Sharpton to recognize it. In Sudan it appears to the untrained observer to be flourishing, though I'm sure that the Sudanese "Arabs" — they're actually mostly Nilotic — aren't capable of true racism, being of the Third World and Muslim and all.
He quotes Elfadl Elsharief, a Muslim Sudanese, as saying, “It is nonsense to suggest that the death, destruction and the suffering of the Darfurian people is imaginary or that Zionists are using us as propaganda. The Sudanese government-backed militias are the people who are killing their fellow Sudanese. The tragedy is that Muslims are killing Muslims.”
It's just the Master Race™ killing the Üntermenschen. The German Nazis professed Christianity and were perfectly happy killing large numbers of other Christians. Why should Muslim Nazis be any different?
According to Fatah, for three years, the government of Sudan has been engaging in genocide of the people of Darfur. For all these years, Khartoum has invoked its Islamic credentials to stave off any criticism or censure from inside the Muslim world, falsely posturing itself as a defender of Muslim frontiers against Western imperialism. It is time for Muslims to rip off Khartoum’s “mask of deception” and speak the truth.
It's not a very big mask, not even very firmly attached. In fact, it's made of transparent material. It doesn't really take much effort to see through it, but I guess you have to be willing to do so.
Fatah quotes another Sudanese, el-Farouk Khaki, an immigration lawyer, and president of the Muslim Canadian Congress, who said, “This is racism at its worst. I am an African-Canadian; I can tell you in no uncertain terms that the Darfur crisis has not made news in the traditional Muslim organisations because Darfurians are black.
Wowzers. He said the "R" word. I think I can now predict that the awakened Muslim world will... ummm... ignore him.
"Had they been Bosnian, Kosovar, Arab, Pakistani or Iranian, I can bet you, these grounds would have been full of slogan-chanting Muslims demanding justice.
I tend to doubt that. When the Bosnians and Kosovars were being killed in large numbers the Muslim world wasn't out chanting their slogans. Pak Shiites are bumped off almost every day and nobody raises an eyebrow. Iranians casually oppress each other every day and the Muslim world's on the side of the oppressors, where they usually are. Face it: the Muslim world has a fondness for the sight of blood, and they're not particular about whose it is.
"Muslims need to address their internalised racism before they ask others to respect us.”
Right. They're gonna hop right on it. I'm sure the Arab League will take the lead, like they always do.
Posted by:Fred

#11  "decries the position that Jews have stolen the issue of Darfur"

as IF it's a political issue, or a public relations issue. HELLO, it's a humanitarian issue. Which is why the muslim world is deafeningly silent.
Posted by: PlanetDan   2006-05-07 18:54  

#10  also not reported is that during the Darfur conflict hundreds of Darfurian mosques (and some on the other side) have been burned or destroyed by explosives.

This implies tens of thousands of Korans also destroyed.

Moslems are silent about this also.
Posted by: mhw   2006-05-07 17:23  

#9  This story is not important enough to report. Better that Greta spend a couple years doing remotes from Aruba about a pretty girl getting raped and killed
Posted by: Frank G   2006-05-07 13:06  

#8  Muslims protest when they percieve a non-muslim country acting against muslims. It is perfectly all right to kill muslims if one is muslim. The problem arises when it is the kaffir.

Right. it's like in Animal House: "He can't do that to our pledges. Only we can do that to our pledges."
Posted by: xbalanke   2006-05-07 12:44  

#7  The myth isn't the matter of their existence -- that's not in doubt -- it's their prevalence. The myth claims that the moderates are the predominant -- but silent -- population inside Islam.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-05-07 12:19  

#6  Speaking of "trained observers"....I am not a trained observer so I may be wrong, but, did I just see a glimpse of the Mythical Moderate Muslim?

I'll of course defer to the greater skill of the 'burgian elite. ;^)
Posted by: AlanC   2006-05-07 12:14  

#5  I'd just like to give the producers of ER a little credit here for tackling Sudan in their May sweeps and not explicitly blaming Dubya or the Jooos. Of course the little episode summary on the cable guide said "Pratt angers gun-toting militants with his arrogance", so they got that wrong, but overall it's a scary look at refugee life in Darfur.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-05-07 11:57  

#4  "Had they been Bosnian, Kosovar, Arab, Pakistani or Iranian, I can bet you, these grounds would have been full of slogan-chanting Muslims demanding justice.

Really?

The Pakistani army killed 3 million Bengalis in East Pakistan, most of them muslims, citizen of their own country.

No crowd of muslims has called for justice.
The criminals of the 71 genocide live in palatial surroundings, enjoyig their retirement.

How many muslims did Saddam kill? 500,000 ?
Any protestors?

How many Kurds have been killed by Turkey? How many thousands of villages razed to the ground?

Muslims protest when they percieve a non-muslim country acting against muslims. It is perfectly all right to kill muslims if one is muslim. The problem arises when it is the kaffir.

To have the kaffir do it is to accept that islam will not conquer all, to accept that Islam is not triumphant.

Posted by: john   2006-05-07 10:48  

#3  We have racism in this country, of course, though by now it usually takes a trained observer like Al Sharpton to recognize it

Dang! Better than Noonan. Have you considered speech-writing for fun and profit Fred?
Posted by: 6   2006-05-07 10:02  

#2  Eric Jablow: Those willing to slaughter one group of people for racial or religious reasons will always end up trying to slaughter the Jews.

It's called the Muslim reboot.
Posted by: RD   2006-05-07 01:54  

#1  Fred, most of the people at the DC Darfur protest last week were associated with synagogues and other Jewish organizations. Hey—that's what we do.

Those willing to slaughter one group of people for racial or religious reasons will always end up trying to slaughter the Jews.
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2006-05-07 00:54  

00:00