You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Flying robot attack "unstoppable": experts
2006-05-09
It may sound like science fiction, but the prospect that suicide bombers and hijackers could be made redundant by flying robots is a real one, according to experts. The technology for remote-controlled light aircraft is now highly advanced, widely available -- and, experts say, virtually unstoppable.

Models with a wingspan of five metres (16 feet), capable of carrying up to 50 kilograms (110 pounds), remain undetectable by radar. And thanks to satellite positioning systems, they can now be programmed to hit targets some distance away with just a few metres (yards) short of pinpoint accuracy. Security services the world over have been considering the problem for several years, but no one has yet come up with a solution.

"We are observing an increasing threat from such things as remote-controlled aircraft used as small flying bombs against soft targets," the head of the Canadian secret services, Michel Gauthier, said at a conference in Calgary recently. According to Gauthier, "ultra-light aircraft, powered hang gliders or powered paragliders have also been purchased by terrorist groups to circumvent ground-based countermeasures."

On May 1 the US website Defensetech published an article by military technology specialist David Hambling, entitled "Terrorists' unmanned air force". "While billions have been spent on ballistic missile defense, little attention has been given to the more imminent threat posed by unmanned air vehicles in the hands of terrorists or rogue states," writes Hambling.

Armed militant groups have already tried to use unmanned aircraft, according to a number of studies by institutions including the Center for Nonproliferation studies in Monterey, California, and the Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies in Moscow.

In August 2002, for example, the Colombian military reported finding nine small remote-controlled planes at a base it had taken from the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). On April 11, 2005 the Lebanese Shiite militia group, Hezbollah, flew a pilotless drone over Israeli territory, on what it called a "surveillance" mission. The Israeli military confirmed this and responded by flying warplanes over southern Lebanon.

Remote-control planes are not hard to get hold of, according to Jean-Christian Delessert, who runs a specialist model airplane shop near Geneva. "Putting together a large-scale model is not difficult -- all you need is a few materials and a decent electronics technician," says Delessert. In his view, "if terrorists get hold of that, it will be impossible to do anything about it. We did some tests with a friend who works at a military radar base: they never detected us... if the radar picks anything up, it thinks it is a flock of birds and automatically wipes it."

Japanese company Yamaha, meanwhile, has produced 95-kilogram (209-pound) robot helicopter that is 3.6 metres (11.8 feet) long and has a 256 cc engine. It flies close to the ground at about 20 kilometres per hour (12 miles per hour), nothing but an incredible stroke of luck could stop it if it suddenly appeared in the sky above the White House -- and it is already on the market.

Bruce Simpson, an engineer from New Zealand, managed to produce an even more dangerous contraption in his own garage: a mini-cruise missile. He made it out of readily available materials at a cost of less than 5,000 dollars (4,000 euros). According to Simpson's website , the New Zealand authorities forced him to shut down the project -- though only once he had already finished making the missile -- under pressure from the United States.

Eugene Miasnikov of the Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies in Moscow said these kinds of threats must be taken more seriously. "To many people UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) may seem too exotic, demanding substantial efforts and cost compared with the methods terrorists frequently use," he said. "But science and technology is developing so fast that we often fail to recognise how much the world has changed."
Posted by:Steve

#10  V1, meet the Kabba. Kabba, V1.
Posted by: ed   2006-05-09 22:20  

#9  Looks like the boyz over at the Net's military modeling and rocket blogs, etc. have to register their YAMATO + BISMARCK + USS TENNESSEE models wid the FBI, Secret Service, ATF, TSA and CIA-DIA-NSA. DON'T FERGIT THOSE TRAITOROUS FIFTH COLUMNIST TYKES OVER THE LOCAL DAY CARE/PRE-SCHOOL WID THEIR KITES + TONKAS + HOTWHEELS + WOODEN TRUCKS + DOLLIES - I TELL YA THEY'RE BUILDING BOMBS IN DEM DAR EASY-BAKE OVENS AND KICKBALLS!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-05-09 22:19  

#8  
Expert. x=the unknown. spert/spurt=drip under pressure.

Expert=An unknown drip under pressure!

Note: Some artistic license was used.
Posted by: Manolo   2006-05-09 22:15  

#7  Pretty Simple.

We tell Saudi Arabia and so on that they put a leash on thier wahabbist and salafist, or for every strike on us there is an equal one on them, except ours will be precisely aimed at their mosques.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-05-09 22:02  

#6  For this to work the robot aircraft would have to be very numeous and small. How many and how small? Only Hatfil........fsdafas./a;gaaaaaaaaaaf

Hatfield: You were gonna say thousands and tiny wern't 'ya?
6: Yes, I wan going to say thousands, of tiny flying robots what's wrong with tha.....ahhhh! Let go of my leg!
Posted by: 6   2006-05-09 19:27  

#5  
Watch out for the huge clear hydrogen filled blimp comming like a Hindenburg to your neighborhood....
Posted by: 3dc   2006-05-09 19:16  

#4  Very small planes carrying explosives, meet moderately-powered lasers.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-05-09 17:26  

#3  Its one thing to have a vehicle, but quite another to pilot it. The vast majority of the technology has been around since I was four, when my dad took the hobby up. He tried to teach me to fly them, but my bum eyes kept me from being any good at it.

Still, whatever you grab off the shelf, or build custom, will have limited carrying capacity and distance: I think one could carry a hand-grenade. I can also think of how to coordinate a bomb run on the White House.

Obviously the physical damage would be minimal, and only by bad luck would someone actually get hurt or killed. The value is strictly symbolic, and given the typical Muslim hype machine, the Ummah could be convinced that it was the equivalent of a WW-II style bombing raid on Dresden or Coventry...
Understand that, while the physical damage would be minimal, it would be outweighed by the psychological effect multiplied by the typical Muslim hype-machine.
Posted by: Ptah   2006-05-09 14:47  

#2  Damn, all is lost. I guess we'd better all convert right now.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-05-09 12:45  

#1  ...experts say, virtually unstoppable.

They don't know our scrambling technology then...

Experts, good for nothing.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-05-09 10:13  

00:00