You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Subsaharan
Oxfam says rich states neglect Congo crisis
2006-05-14
Rich countries are not giving enough money to help fight a humanitarian crisis in Congo, where more than 1,000 people die daily from violence, hunger and disease, an international charity said on Saturday.
I'm underwhelmed.
Oxfam International said donors had committed only $94 million of the $682 million needed for a Humanitarian Action Plan for Democratic Republic of Congo launched by the United Nations, the Red Thingy Cross and aid agencies in February. But donors had invested more than $459 million in support of presidential and parliamentary elections set for July 30. The first multi-party polls in the Congo in 40 years are aimed at drawing a line under years of dictatorship, war and chaos. Oxfam's Democratic Republic of Congo country manager, Juliette Prodhan, said while the international community was right to back the polls "voting alone won't cure the problems."
Having a stable government is the key to curing the problem, lady.
Rich country governments have a moral obligation to act when 1,200 people are dying every day from conflict-related causes, Prodhan said in an Oxfam statement sent to Reuters.
I feel no such moral obligation and Oxfam and its ilk are pretty damned arrogant defining such obligations for us. The DRC decided they wanted to have a dictatorship, and various factions within it decided that they were big on Armed Struggle™. The U.S. didn't, Europe didn't, they did. Anything we contribute toward cleaning up the mess they made is charity, not an obligation. The proper response is "Thank you for what you've given," not "Give us more, damn you."
"To their shame Italy, Germany and France have committed nothing or almost nothing to the appeal, whilst the contributions of countries like the U.S. and Japan remain minuscule compared with the size of their economies," she added. Oxfam said even the response of consistently faithful donors like Finland, Sweden and Canada had been disappointing.
Perhaps they're tired of flushing currency down the toilet?
Posted by:Fred

#7  Ask the Arabs - they've got plenty of our money.

We're busy.

And sick of throwing our money down a rat hole.

Here's an idea, Oxfam - give them your personal money and possessions. I'm sure they'd be suitably grateful.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-05-14 17:34  

#6  Anyone old enough to remember the African freedom movements from Jomo Kenyatta and his Mau Maus on should not be surprised. During the height of the liberation movements, a breathless BBC reporter asked a "freedom fighter" what Uhuru (Freedom) meant to him. He said, it means we take the white man's houses, his land, his factories, and his women. The subsequent free African government suffered from unrealistic expectations, no understanding of economics, and most importantly, no respect for the law. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Pricks that make up organizations like Oxfam are almost self-parodies. They are by and large useless people dedicated to proving their moral superiority by trying to shame productive people into giving them money so they can take up the white man's burden.
Posted by: RWV   2006-05-14 12:09  

#5  The Congo was simply not ready for independence.

Granted the Belgians did a terrible job and needed to be gone from there years before. Some sort of trusteeship under the UK may have worked, with independence granted after a generation of leaders were nurtured.

At independence, there were no native officers in the army. There were only thirty native people with a university education, this in a country the size of western europe.

Contrast that with British colonies...

Posted by: john   2006-05-14 11:03  

#4  If it happens nearly every year, it is not a crisis. It is normal.
Posted by: Elmemble Hupamp7763   2006-05-14 10:37  

#3  throw money at the problem and surely it will go away.
Posted by: 2b   2006-05-14 06:47  

#2  Doesn't the head of Oxfam pull in 7 figures a year?
Posted by: anonymous2u   2006-05-14 02:49  

#1  The Congo you say? Better hit up France and Belgium. Not the UK and US
Posted by: SPoD   2006-05-14 00:27  

00:00