You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
UN watchdog calls for Guantánamo closure
2006-05-19
Welcome to the club pal, line forms to the left.
The US should shut Guantánamo Bay and give detainees access to a fair trial or release them, a UN human rights watchdog said today. The UN committee against torture voiced concern that detainees were being held at the camp for long periods without judicial scrutiny of the reasons for their detention, adding that Guantánamo detainees had insufficient legal safeguards. "The state party should cease to detain any person at Guantánamo Bay and close the detention facility," a committee report, published today, said.

The committee - part of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights - expressed concern over allegations that the US had established secret prisons around the world at which the international Red Cross aid agency did not have access to detainees. The watchdog called on the US to ensure that nobody was detained in secret detention centres under its control and reveal the existence of any such facilities. "The state party should investigate and disclose the existence of any such facilities and the authority under which they have been established and the manner in which detainees are treated," the report said. Detainees at Guantánamo and other camps should not be returned to any countries where they could face a "real risk" of torture, the committee added. The report said the US must "take immediate measures to eradicate all forms of torture and ill-treatment" committed by its personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq. It called on Washington to investigate allegations thoroughly, prosecuting any personnel found guilty.

Earlier this month, the US made in its first appearance before the Geneva-based committee against torture in six years. It was called to address a series of issues ranging from Washington's interpretation of the UN's absolute ban on torture to its interrogation methods in Guantánamo and the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Photos of abuse committed by US troops at the Baghdad prison sparked international outrage, while hundreds of "enemy combatants" are still being held at Guantánamo as part of the "war on terror". The committee said the US should halt interrogation techniques constituting torture or cruel treatment, citing methods including sexual humiliation, mock drownings and the use of dogs to induce fear.

Its report said some methods of interrogation had "resulted in the death of some detainees", and criticised vague US guidelines on the treatment of detainees that "have led to serious abuse". US officials in Geneva have so far declined to comment on the committee's findings. Guantánamo has been criticised by human rights campaigners and governments across the world. Earlier this month, the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, called for the immediate closure of the camp, claiming its existence was "unacceptable". However, the Bush administration has consistently defended the treatment of detainees at the facility, insisting its existence is legal under international law.
Posted by:mcsegeek1

#10  With so very many, many, many other much larger problems out there for the UN, shut the crap up and try UNing something of greater abuse and danger. Why, oh why doesn't some jihadi blow up the UN?
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-05-19 20:21  

#9  ...and give the UN 'delegates' 72 hours to leave town.

Will they have to pay off all their parking tickets first?
Posted by: Raj   2006-05-19 19:38  

#8  The United Dictatorships Nations is a waste of time and energy. The US needs to withdraw, and give the UN 'delegates' 72 hours to leave town. I don't care where they go, as long as they leave here. The US can then begin building an organization of free nations, and quit paying for all the trash in the world.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-05-19 15:59  

#7   Capsu 78, is there a difference between your dog taking a dump and closing the UN? Both involve elimination of waste and other awfully smelly things...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-05-19 15:29  

#6  Damn, I wish our politicos read the 'burg. The posters here have the best rebuttals/comebacks. When I weasel my way into politics I'm stealing some of the lines from this place.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2006-05-19 15:02  

#5  And compared the the conditions in the other jails in Cuba holding real political prisoners rounded up in their homes and streets is ....?
Posted by: Snomose Hupaitle7011   2006-05-19 14:01  

#4  Well, I'm always calling for the UN's closure, and they never listen to me. So let's call it even...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-05-19 10:57  

#3  Sounds good to me. Summarily execute all the detainees left and hand over the keys to the UN on the way out.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2006-05-19 10:25  

#2  My watchdog just looked up and I think he is calling for UN closure... or he wants to go outside and take a dump.
Posted by: Capsu 78   2006-05-19 09:56  

#1  Ummm, how do I say this politely? Oh, I've got it: "Bl*w me, UN".
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-05-19 09:46  

00:00