You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran delivers 1,000 SA-7 Strela ground-air missiles, more IEDs to Iraqi Shia
2006-05-20
Debka report so salt to taste.
In the past two weeks, Iran has been pumping into Iraq two types of extra-lethal weapons in very large quantities. They have already taken their toll in the shooting down of two military helicopters - one American and one British – and an estimated 19 deaths of US military personnel.

DEBKAfileÂ’s military and intelligence sources estimate the delivery to Iraqi insurgents as consisting of around 1,000 SA-7 Strela ground-air missiles made in Iran, and a very large quantity of a newly-developed roadside bomb, loaded with compressed gas instead of ball bearings and cartridges, to magnify their blast and explosive power.

The supplies have been distributed across Iraq - Basra and Amara in the south, Baghdad and its environs, Haditha in the west, and Mosul in the north.

The new bombs, developed jointly by IranÂ’s Revolutionary Guards and the Lebanese Hizballah, have already gone into service with the Shiite terrorists on the Lebanese border with Israel. Israeli military sources say it is only a matter of time before the deadly roadside bombs, already used in Iraq, will also reach Palestinian areas in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

In Iraq, the new weaponry has had three major effects:

1. The guerrilla-terrorist groups which received the shoulder-carried, highly mobile Strela missiles have scored three hits in fourteen days. On May 6, they fired a missile from one of BasraÂ’s crowded alleys and downed a British military helicopter, killing all four military personnel aboard. Sunday, May 14, Iraqi insurgents shot down an American helicopter, killing its two crewmen over Yussifiya, inside the Triangle of Death south of Baghdad.

2. The number of roadside bomb attacks, their precision and lethality is going up all the time. Sunday, May 14, four US soldiers died in these blasts in the western Anbar province and Baghdad, while 2 British soldiers were killed and another injured at the same time near Basra. In seven days, the British force stationed in southern Iraq lost seven men, a record for that space of time in the three-year war. In the first half of May, US troop losses spiraled to 19, most of them the victims of the new roadside bombs.

3. Together with the new Iranian weapons, a new array of Shiite terrorist groups has sprung up and is hitting American and British troops. The coalition has imposed a blackout on this disturbing development.

Until now, the insurgent forces fighting the coalition consisted mostly of Baathists, Islamist and al Qaeda. The only Shiite enemy was the radical Mogtada Sadr and his Mahdi Army. The appearance of the new Shiite insurgents is a dread milestone in the Iraq war, one which has caught US and UK commanders by surprise and unprepared for the steep rise in troop losses.

DEBKAfileÂ’s Exclusive Iraq sources offer some information on the new groups. One is located north of Baghdad and calls itself Brigades of the Imam Kazim. Another, called Brigades of Imam Ali, claimed the attack on April 27 in Nasiriya in which one of their new roadside bombs killed two Italian troops. In the Rostumiya region south of Baghdad, a Shiite group called Brigades of the Imam Hadi has begun operating. Our sources report that this group has been firing Katyusha rockets at American bases in the region, similar to the mortar attack directed at a British base in Amara Monday, May 15.

After each attack, these unknown quantities issue bulletins describing their actions, some accompanied by video footage from the scene of action.

The blackout was imposed on the new Shiite groups in the absence of American or British intelligence on who they and their commanders are, how they operate and what makes them tick. Research must start from square one to find out whether they are being controlled from Tehran, some Iraqi Shiite faction or elements which chanced to lay hands on the new-fangled weaponry.
Posted by:3dc

#12  
"We either take the gloves off on both the Iranians and these new Shiite militias/insurgents or we should just leave and write the whole thing off."

The gloves will come off in due time, as for just walking away, we can't do that either.

Keep in mind, for everything you think you know about the situation, there are a thousand things you don't know.

As for our men and women in the Armed Forces, it hurts to lose even one of them! But it's the job they all VOLUNTEERED for.

-M
Posted by: Manolo   2006-05-20 23:00  

#11  Move along, boyz, no Radical Iranian empire in the ME here, NO WMDS in IRAN, Its only Uranium, NOT Plutonium - Mistaken Ditzy Klutzy Dufus Moronic = wilful Warmonger Imperialist Bully Arrogant America makes yet another mistake showing why it needs to come under OWG and Regulatory Socialist-Centralist-Governmentist Totalitarian rule = governance.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-05-20 22:36  

#10  Anymouse has got it. We either take the gloves off on both the Iranians and these new Shiite militias/insurgents or we should just leave and write the whole thing off. Just letting our guys get whacked with Iranian-sourced weapons is not acceptable. Doing nothing is a sign of weakness and will only encourage more these animals.
Posted by: Remoteman   2006-05-20 20:00  

#9  Captain...I understand. But, US servicemen and women are dying almost daily because the blackhats are supplying technology, money, and explosives to the terrorists. Somehow they have to receive a message...crystal clear. I don't want a shooting war. I want to disrupt the fragile infrastructure such that they implode...and implode before they get the first N-warhead.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-05-20 18:41  

#8  It always slays me when people riff the president about keeping the oil flowing while they tool along in their gasoline fueled vehicle. This is both cynical and hypocritical. Those who protest should get out and walk.

This is and will be a regional conflict, starting with diplomacy if only to avoid warfare and still achieve our obvious objective: the mad moolahs sans nukes. Once this card is played out (and it looks to be) should we invest blood and treasure.

Posted by: Captain America   2006-05-20 18:12  

#7  Or killa Kilo.
Posted by: 6   2006-05-20 16:11  

#6  or pop a mullah ....or a barracks full of Revolutionary Guards - payback for Beirut
Posted by: Frank G   2006-05-20 16:06  

#5  You don't have to have direct military confrontation with blackhats to make the point. All you do is pop an an oil terminal.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-05-20 15:09  

#4  The least we could do is step up attacks in Iran. There are ways, let's use them. Let us take the offensive and put them back on their heels for a change.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-05-20 13:43  

#3  Or, to be a little clearer, oil is certainly a reason for us to be in Iraq. But I don't think it's a matter of protecting "oil pals". I think it's a matter of protecting oil flows to the global economy so that the next 10 years of instability and conflict don't crash the world economy.
Posted by: lotp   2006-05-20 13:03  

#2   There is no point being there unless this is handled as a theatre problem.

Agreed, but the problem is whether/when the direct military action gets addressed at this level. The Bush administration has in fact been using other means: we tend to forget, for instance, how hard they pushed Syria and how shocked everyone else was at the overt pressure.

The job our military are doing in Iraq is incredibly important, more difficult in many ways than force-on-force operations and a central part of dealing the with early-stage breakup of international power structures going on. Oil is, I think, just a part of it ...
Posted by: lotp   2006-05-20 12:58  

#1  This may not be completely accurate, but most likely this is the case. I agree with what Old Patriot posted here. This is a mess as long as there is no control on inflows from Iran & Syria. Of course, Iran is problem # 1. Has been since'79. There is no point being there unless this is handled as a theatre problem. I have the ugly knawing feeling that Bush/Cheney Inc. think they can use American blood to just safe guard their oil pals and keep the oil flowing. No other objective. Paid help just to keep things bubbling along. Otherwise, you have to get serious and clean out the entire rat's nest.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-05-20 12:46  

00:00