You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Not all Pakistan machinery ‘on board’ in fighting Taliban
2006-05-21
A new report quotes American officials as stating privately that “parts of the Pakistani state may not be fully on board” in the fight against the Taliban. The report published by the Council on Foreign Relations and authored by Barnett A Rubin, who was UN special representative Lakhdar Brahmi’s adviser on Afghanistan and is the author of a number of books on Afghanistan, quotes these American officials as arguing that, given President Pervez Musharraf’s “vulnerability,” Washington should stick to a policy of “public support and private pressure” so as to not destabilise his regime. He argues that this approach rests on the belief that stability in Pakistan depends solely on the military, a “self-serving view” promoted by the latter to their American counterparts for decades.

According to Rubin, the US government must recognise that security in Afghanistan hinges on democratising Pakistan. Military domination of the Pakistani state is the problem, not the solution. Elections will not democratise Pakistan as long as the military continues to control state institutions. The US needs to signal at a high level that it wants to see the withdrawal of military control from PakistanÂ’s civilian institutions and genuine freedom for political parties. It should support PakistanÂ’s development by immediately lifting restrictions on Pakistani textile imports into the US, as Pakistani business has a strong economic interest in Afghan stabilisation.
Posted by:Fred

#5  I really think the US army should take a clue from the pakistani one, and start issuing similar row of medals to each and every soldier : that would provide near unbreachable chest protection, and thus send the Pinnacle/Interceptor debate by introducing a superior option. Voilà! Problem solved.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-05-21 12:34  

#4  That's due to the constant strain of holding that row of medals up, 6, heh.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-05-21 12:17  

#3  Magenta overload!
Posted by: 6   2006-05-21 05:33  

#2  "...may not be fully on board."

Rates a combined MoO/understatement of the year award...
Posted by: PBMcL   2006-05-21 01:40  

#1  ISI has been propping up Al Qaeda indirectly and the Taliban directly all along.

We need to help Perv out by giving him sonme hired guns to do a bit of housecleaning by way of 9mm or defenestration of large members of the ISI leadership and questionable members of the armed forces. Needs to be several hundred killed all in all. And several dozen "families" killed to the last family member as well - not our rules, its how they do things there - plus take down the tribal leadership. No trials, just a quick bullet in the night.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-05-21 01:37  

00:00