You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
India reacts to Pope's remarks about religious intolerance
2006-05-21
India has hit back at criticism attributed to Pope Benedict XVI about "disturbing signs of religious intolerance" in the country, saying people of all faiths enjoy equal rights under the law. "It is acknowledged universally that India is a secular and democratic country in which adherents of all religious faiths enjoy equal rights," India's foreign ministry said in a statement late Friday. "The constitution of India states that 'all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion'," the ministry said, adding it was responding to reports of the pontiff's comments.

The statement came a day after the pope reportedly criticised India for "disturbing signs of religious intolerance which have troubled some regions of India". The Times of India, and other media, reported that the pope voiced strong criticism to India's new ambassador to the Vatican, Amitava Tripathi, over attempts by some Indian states to introduce legislation to ban what some call "forced conversions". The pope criticised India for a "reprehensible attempt to legislate clearly discriminatory restrictions on the fundamental right of religious freedom," the Times said.
Posted by:Fred

#9  India has an active radical Muslim movement bent on killing all Hindus they come upon. The Pope should pull his head out of his a** and get on the train. India is correct, and it's about time. How many have to be murdered before these countries take a stand ?
Posted by: wxjames   2006-05-21 20:31  

#8  I'm not sure if the state legislature of Rajasthan can override this veto. They probably will attempt to appeal to the Indian President, but he is unlikely to respond.



Posted by: john   2006-05-21 10:15  

#7  Actually the religious conversion bill (which seeks to ban forced conversions) has been vetoed by the Governor of Rajasthan State a few days ago.

So there was a reaction to the Pope's complaint.

The FM statement is for public consumption...




Posted by: john   2006-05-21 10:11  

#6  MM is Michael Malkin. I don't think the ad still runs.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-05-21 08:34  

#5  "BTW Manola, are you the one who put the sidebar ad at MM's site."

Nope! Wasn't me. Do you have a link for "MM's" site? I would like to see the ad.

-M
Posted by: Manolo   2006-05-21 08:30  

#4  Actually, it's not completely clear to me if 2b meant the Vatican or India by "them"
Posted by: sludge   2006-05-21 08:21  

#3  I agree with Manola here. India goes to extraordinary lengths to achieve religous equality.

BTW Manola, are you the one who put the sidebar ad at MM's site. At first I thought your pitch was dumb, but after a few viewings it bounced around my head and it made an impact. Never went to your site thought; just for info.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-05-21 08:05  

#2  "me think they doth protest too much."

Do you? Actually India is a secular democracy...well, most of it. And in "most" regions of India freedom of religion is the norm.

The problem is that there are regions of India not under Delhi's control. India, is NOT a homogenous country or people.

Delhi is working hard to bring these troubled areas into line with national policy, but it is not an easy task. They protest "too much" as you ignorantly (I mean that in the best possible way...think uninformed) put it, because it has been an uphill slog to get to where they are today.

Put another way, the have made tremendous progress and continue to work hard to make religous freedom a fact of life in all of India.

Naturally, they would resent the Pontif, pontificating about crap he himself is probably misinformed on.

-M
Posted by: Manolo   2006-05-21 07:33  

#1  me think they doth protest too much.
Posted by: 2b   2006-05-21 04:56  

00:00