Submit your comments on this article |
Tech note... |
2006-05-26 |
We've been getting a lot of duplicate posts lately, so I wrote a routine to check the URLs and to check the headlines against the current and previous day's posts. If there's a hit, the post will be flagged and will go to the editors' queue, to be either quietly deleted or to be released some sites reuse URLs, even though it's lousy practice. So if your post disappears when you hit "Submit," probably somebody beat you to it. |
Posted by:Fred |
#10 so get bizee!!! :p j.k. fred :) |
Posted by: muck4doo 2006-05-26 21:59 |
#9 Yeah. But I still have to do the documentation. That'll take seven months... |
Posted by: Fred 2006-05-26 21:57 |
#8 Waves at Mrs. Davis. |
Posted by: 6 2006-05-26 18:15 |
#7 Great turn around speed Fred! It would have taken 6 months with a SEI/ISO std. concern. |
Posted by: 3dc 2006-05-26 11:03 |
#6 I thought so too, but it is good to always have something in the queue. |
Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2006-05-26 08:59 |
#5 NS, that's a good idea, and I'm sure Fred can whip that one up in his abundant leisure time ... :-) |
Posted by: Steve White 2006-05-26 08:48 |
#4 But not fool proof. Two articles posted today on Bush/Blair one WaPo other NY Slimes. Too bad the comments in one can't be directed to the other so the comments are in a single thread. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-05-26 07:20 |
#3 Good idea. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-05-26 07:11 |
#2 Gret! Now I won't have to use my brain. Mostly I avoided that, because I looked first, but sometimes the clever titles caused me to overlook a duplicate. I just hope now that checking is no longer necessary that the flood will not clog the I/O. Do we still do that? Or do we use up bandwidth? |
Posted by: Bobby 2006-05-26 06:36 |
#1 Good...a needed feature. |
Posted by: gromky 2006-05-26 04:10 |