You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Ignore the Present and Reinforce the Future
2006-05-26
May 26, 2006: In the last 30 years, China's GDP has become ten times larger. During that period, the Chinese armed forces actually shrank, in terms of troops, and didn't increase its combat power in the same proportion. China has bought many new weapons in the last thirty years, in relatively small quantities. Yet China is still largely a force equipped with weapons and equipment several decades behind what the United States possesses. What China is doing is creating the ability to develop and manufacture a wide range of weapons and equipment in the future. Such a capability requires skills and industries that only advanced industrial economies possess. This includes the development and manufacturing of jet engines, nuclear submarines, microelectronics, space satellites and the like.
Build up your industrial and technological base first, while watching developements overseas. Let others try stuff and see what works. China always did think long term.
Officially, the U.S. expresses shock, surprise and uncertainty at what China is doing with its armed forces. But in fact, the Chinese are not building new weapons in large quantities, with the exception of short range ballistic missiles (aimed at Taiwan). However, China is building a capability to, within a few years, manufacture large quantities of new weapons based on newly developed technologies. Thus China is investing heavily in the ability to become a military superpower, but it has not yet used that capability, and may never do so. Long term, the Chinese strategy is far more likely to make China a formidable military power in the future, than if China simply tried to update all the weapons and equipment they currently have, and continue doing so. China is not trying to become a military superpower now, but is laying the groundwork to do so in the future, if it believes it needs to.

China's strategy also leads to disagreements over what China's defense budget actually is. According to the Chinese, it is about a tenth of what the U.S. spends each year. According to the U.S., China's defense spending is about a third of what America spends. China is no doubt spending far less, but investing, by their standards, a lot more into their military future.
Posted by:Steve

#4  China's "String of Pearls", "Turtles of War", "Assassin's Mace", and "Battle/War/Local Zone" strategies are directly or indirectly based on a future decline in US power, to include either wilful US abandonment or withdrawal from major geographic regions or areas. Whatever its called/labeled at the moment, China's ultimate intent is to reach parity and then superiority and dominance vv declining America. What China, or RUSSIA, does NOT envision in LT is a Cold War-style bilateral or multilateral geopol competition vv the USA where the USA is Russia-China's permanent equal.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-05-26 21:00  

#3  30-years ago Russia unlike the US today, was a real threat.
Posted by: bernardz   2006-05-26 11:47  

#2  More like all they can afford.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-05-26 09:49  

#1  More like stealing and buying technology for the future.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-05-26 09:38  

00:00