You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
GOP to put war up for debate
2006-05-26
WASHINGTON -- House Republican leaders, in a significant political gamble, are planning to hold a free-flowing debate over the Iraq war on the House floor in coming weeks, facing head-on what may be the most difficult issue to threaten pro-war incumbents in the fall election.

"We are the people's house, and serious issues of the day ought to be debated here in the House," said House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio). "And a lot of members on both sides of the aisle have concerns about where we are, what is going on. Others have concerns that the whole story in Iraq isn't being told in terms of all the good things that are happening there."

The decision to hold a public debate on an issue that has sent President Bush's approval ratings tumbling and put Democrats within striking distance of recapturing the House reflects the growing pressure facing Republicans from bad news about the war. GOP leaders hope the forum will give their endangered incumbents a chance to distance themselves from the war, argue that it is going better than most recognize, or both.

Wars and other military conflicts have long triggered sharp emotions in Congress, imperiling political careers and prompting public despondency as well as enthusiasm. With the winding down of the Vietnam War and revelations about the Watergate scandal, voters swept in a new freshman class with 92 members in 1974, roiling the usually staid House with an influx of largely liberal members.

Republicans would like to avoid a similar backlash in November, but GOP House members are split on the wisdom of staging a full-blown floor debate. Boehner, the driving force behind the idea, said he remembered debating the Persian Gulf war in January 1991, when he was a newly elected member of Congress.
Posted by:Nimble Spemble

#4  They may feel they need to distance themselves from the Administration in order to get re-elected. Especially if they think Murtha was right and the Marines were war criminals. If that story holds up it could defeat the entire WoT.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-05-26 19:10  

#3  I think they understand that they need to get past the MSM and explain the war/progress/rationale over the media's heads, directly to the people, with minimal spin and the people will support it
Posted by: Frank G   2006-05-26 16:37  

#2  I think they are gambling that most Republicans support the war and may forget the pork, the scandals, and immigration stuff they've been sleazing around with lately.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-05-26 15:28  

#1  And the truth shall set you free.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-05-26 13:41  

00:00