You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
McKinney probe enters 3rd month
2006-06-05
I believe that the photo being used by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution may be even funnier than Rantburg's
You're correct, and it's now in the photo library, as well as here. AoS
Police unions criticize U.S. attorney

The grand jury investigation of 4th District Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney enters its third month today with no hint from the federal prosecutor about how much longer it will take to settle a case that legal experts said should have been wrapped up in a matter of days. McKinney was accused of striking a Capitol Hill police officer March 29, and the case was referred to the grand jury April 5. The drawn-out process of deciding whether she should be charged with assault has police fuming that the DeKalb County Democrat is getting preferential treatment from a politically motivated prosecutor.

"Right from the start this U.S. attorney has handled this case differently from every other case," said Chuck Canterbury, national president of the Fraternal Order of Police. "And it's because she is a sitting congresswoman."
No kidding! Chuck deserves a lifetime achievement 'Master of the Obvious' award.
McKinney's office and the office of U.S. Attorney Ken Wainstein declined to comment.

Capitol police, already angry over McKinney's case, bristled when superiors ordered them last month to drive Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) home rather than investigate the possibility that he'd been drinking after he crashed his car into a barricade near the Capitol. Kennedy later blamed the incident on prescription drugs he'd been taking and checked into a rehabilitation facility.

What most angers the police about the McKinney case is that it involves an assault — no matter how minor — of a police officer. Police reported that McKinney hit an officer in the chest after he failed to recognize her as a member of Congress and tried to stop her from going around a security checkpoint, something members of Congress and their aides are typically allowed to do. "It's obviously frustrating for us," said Andy Maybo, head of the Capitol Hill police union. "This sends out the message that it's OK to hit a police officer — and it's not, regardless of who you are."

In legal terms, McKinney's case "is as simple as you can get," said George Washington University legal expert Jonathan Turley. Usually anyone who hits a police officer is immediately arrested on felony charges, police and legal experts said. In political terms, however, Mc-Kinney's case is far from simple. "It is loaded with emotion, and I think the U.S. attorney is being very, very conservative in how they approach this."

Given the political sensitivity — made all the more delicate by Mc-Kinney's early accusations that she was the victim of racial profiling — legal experts said it's understandable that no decision has been made. "That would be unusual for a run-of-the-mill case, but this isn't a run-of-the-mill case," said Frank Carter, former head of the public defender service in Washington whose clients included White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

He said many cases like McKinney's never reach a grand jury because they're settled quietly and privately, avoiding a public spectacle. "This ... begged for that," he said.
Posted by:ryuge

#11  There will be no trial. The "Royals" and most of the wealthy in this country are immune from arrest and prosecution. If it was me or you our asses would already be rotting in jail. It's the system.

This is one more example of why I am not sure anymore it's worth saving.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-06-05 20:27  

#10  Yes MCS, If I have to rank the offenses, Assaulting a Police Officer is at the top. Clearly a person capable of doing that is capable of doing anything with no regard to the law. However, by not prosecuting Kennedy and letting him walk, any half witted lawyer now has the ammo he/she needs to create doubt in the mind of at least one juror... and trust me if it comes to a trial they will be looking awfully hard for that one.
Posted by: TomAnon   2006-06-05 16:43  

#9  Well not do disagree, but as a former cop I can tell you that I would view a drunken Kennedy as a cliche.. worthy only of pity, or maybe laughter. I still would have arrested him, but maybe the Capitol Police have different rules. But if he had gotten out of the car and slapped me in front of several witnesses, that ain't pity or laughter time. That's 'throw their ass in jail for felony assault on a police officer time'---regardless of color. Still, the Kennedy incident does raise some interesting questions. If it had not been capitol police but a regular street cop in a patrol car, maybe Kennedy would have been charged.

Bottom line is you can get away with a lot of things, depending on the cop. But one thing a cop will NEVER let slide is when you assault him. And if you do go down, don't be a chicken shit and cry racism.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-06-05 13:33  

#8  TomAnon I agree with you and the comparison crossed my mind too when his accident hit the news cycle.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-06-05 13:04  

#7  I think she has a good case for discrimination since the Capitol Police gave Patrick Kennedy a freepass. White guy goes free, black woman prosecuted. DWI in many instances is assault with deadly weapon. Can be prosecuted as premeditated as well. The Capitol Police needs to apply the law to both fairly and equally!!!

But since they gave Kennedy a wink and a nod and drove him home... it would be very difficult to do anything to him now.
Posted by: TomAnon   2006-06-05 11:18  

#6  Is this a great country or what?
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-05 10:44  

#5  Careful, boys - I hear she bites.
Posted by: mojo   2006-06-05 10:00  

#4  "Right from the start this U.S. attorney has handled this case differently from every other case," said Chuck Canterbury, national president of the Fraternal Order of Police. "And it's because it was Whitey's fault that a black woman was singled out by the KKK Capitol police cuz it was da man suppressing the sista, ya know and they don' like a black woman in a white man's world and fuck them whiteys she is a sitting congresswoman."
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-06-05 09:50  

#3  He said many cases like McKinney's never reach a grand jury because they're settled quietly and privately, avoiding a public spectacle .... and another Atlanta street will be named after her.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-06-05 09:36  

#2  And Dennis Hastert (R-Il) belief that he and his are immune from a properly executed warrant is not?
Posted by: Photing Elmeating5120   2006-06-05 09:35  

#1  Again, dhimiCRAPS ABOVE THE LAW!!!
Posted by: ARMYGUY   2006-06-05 07:55  

00:00