You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pentagon won't classify interrogation tactics
2006-06-14
Under pressure from Congress, the Pentagon has dropped plans to keep some interrogation techniques secret by putting them in a classified section of a military manual, defense officials said Tuesday.

Two senior officials said there will not be a classified section in the long-awaited revision of the Army Field Manual. One of the officials said descriptions of interrogation techniques initially planned for the classified section are either being made public or are being eliminated as tactics that can be used against prisoners. The officials requested anonymity because the manual has not been completed.

One human rights group hailed the decision. "I think this is huge," said Elisa Massimino, Washington director of Human Rights First. "It's a very significant step toward creating the kind of clarity in the rules that military personnel have said that they lack and that led to a lot of the abuses."

Military leaders have argued that disclosing all the interrogation techniques public would make it easier for enemy prisoners to resist questioning. Defense Department officials have been at odds over whether details of some interrogation procedures should remain secret and published in a classified section.

But last month, several members of Congress privately cautioned the Pentagon against doing that. The standoff has contributed to the long delay in releasing the manual, which has been in the works for more than a year. Congress members argued that including a secret section — that would detail what interrogators can and can't do to prisoners — could fuel concerns both at home and abroad that the U.S. military was hiding torture techniques that violate the law or rules governing detainee treatment.

As originally planned, the classified section would have included details such as how long prisoners can be forced to sit or stand in certain positions or how hot or cold their holding areas can be kept. The defense officials did not say which interrogation techniques would be included in the manual. Opponents said greater transparency would dispel suspicions that the military was trying to exploit legal loopholes.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said for the first time last month that officials were at odds over whether the manual should endorse different interrogation techniques for enemy insurgents than are allowed for regular prisoners of war. There are concerns such a distinction could violate a law enacted last year that explicitly banned cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of prisoners by U.S. troops.

Massimino, of Human Rights First, said that the new law, pressed by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would ensure that any interrogation technique not included in the manual would be considered illegal. She said it also would help clear up any confusion troops may have had over what tactics are allowed.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#5  Don't know that McCain supports your contention. McCain ultimately ended up "ratting out" after incurring torture.

Ratting out prepared him for his political career as a verifiable RINO
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-14 18:19  

#4  Thanks, Senator McCain. Now that the Jihadis know exactly what the Americans can and cannot do, all they have to do is to train their people to withstand those techniques that are allowed. One of the purposes of the SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) training that all military pilots undergo is to teach them to withstand (mild) torture.

I think that real torture is counter productive. The torturee will say anything to make the pain stop. (Ask McCain.) However, it is getting to the point that anything other than asking nicely, in a comfortable, well lit environment, with a Koran at the prisoner's side, will be considred torture.
Posted by: Rambler   2006-06-14 16:56  

#3  Actually, manuals have very little 'legal' authority in determining such issues. It is the regulations which have legal binding authority. Another fine example of people who don't know what they're dealing with cause they're not part of the culture.
Posted by: Glolulet Gratch4509   2006-06-14 09:00  

#2  This is a manual for the military not the non military spooks. This is just fine.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-06-14 08:00  

#1  Since this orginated with the NY Slimes, add plenty of salt.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-14 01:26  

00:00