You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Successful missile intercept in US sea-based defense test
2006-06-23
A US warship successfully shot down a target missile warhead over the Pacific in a test of a sea-based missile defense system, the US military said. A Japanese destroyer performed surveillance and tracking exercises during the test, marking the first time any US ally has taken part in a US missile defense intercept test, the US Missile Defense Agency said.

The sea-based system tested off Hawaii is designed to counter only short or medium range missiles, but the cruisers and destroyers that took part are capable of tracking long-range missiles as well.

The mock warhead was launched over the Pacific atop a medium range missile and destroyed in a direct hit six minutes later with an SM-3 missile fired by the Aegis cruiser USS Shiloh, the agency said. "The missile successfully intercepted the target warhead outside the earths atmosphere more than 100 miles above the Pacific Ocean and 250 miles northwest of Kauai," the agency said in a statement.

"We are continuing to see great success with the very challenging technology of hit-to-kill, a technology that is used for all of our missile defense ground- and sea-based interceptor missiles," Lieutenant General Trey Obering, the agency chief, said in the statement.

He said it was the seventh successful intercept using the sea-based missile defense system out of eight tries.
So the SM-3 part of the ballistic missile defense is very likely to work under good to ideal conditions. They'll need to figure out all the limitations, but this is really good news.
Missile Defense Agency officials have said the missile interceptor test was long-planned and had nothing to do with North Korea's long-range missile launch plans. But the agency's statement highlighted the role of the Japanese Aegis destroyer. "This event marked the first time that an allied military unit participated in a US Aegis missile defense intercept test," it said.

It said the Japanese destroyer and a US Navy Aegis destroyer performed surveillance and tracking exercises during the test. "This data can also be used to provide targeting information for other missile defense systems, including the ground-based long-range interceptor missiles now deployed in Alaska and California to protect all 50 states from a limited ballistic missile attack," the agency said.
So the Japanese have a good knowledge base and know how to do what we know how to do. All they need is the interceptor.
A third Aegis destroyer used in the test linked up with a land-based missile defense radar to evaluate the ship's ability to receive and use target cueing data from missile defense command centers.

The mock warhead separated from the three-stage target missile. The direct hit marked only the second time a separating warhead has been successfully intercepted by a missile fired from an Aegis cruiser. The cruisers use their modified Spy-1 radars and a shipboard battle management system to detect, track and target the warheads in space. The SM-3 Block IA interceptor missile fired in Thursday's test is slated for deployment in the US Navy and had never been used before in an intercept test.
Posted by:Steve White

#16  As I have always said and continue to maintain; American technology simply kicks major @ss. Our country's military supremacy is a direct outcome of our constitutional system of law. I could not be more pleased that we are on our way to relative immunity from most other nations' launch capabilities.

That said, I wish our politicians could summon sufficient courage to match the puissance of our firepower. We need the collective national will to make it known to our enemies that they tread upon the very thinnest of ice (in hobnail boots on a summers' day).

Somewhere, somehow there has arisen a sense of collective guilt for our astounding success. To be sure that academia is husbanding this moral blight, but Americans in general have fallen for the "ugly American" syndrome in a big way. We need to get over that sense of shame with respect to our superpower status. We also need leadership that is willing to openly indicate just how significant our contribution is to this world's welfare and challenge those who would contradict such a statement.

In the meantime, achievements like this make me extremely proud to have spent over two decades contributing to our nation's technological prowess. It is comforting to know that the world's most free nation is just that much more secure from the harm others would do us.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-06-23 22:08  

#15  Taepo means shooting. I'm not exactly sure what the Dong modifier is, but may be without meaning. Together they may mean Shooting Star, which corresponds to the Iranian translation of Shahab (Shahab 3 = Taepo Dong 1 with koranic verses): Shooting Star or Meteor.

No Dong means Worker, i.e. the commie fetish for the working class (as long as it's not them). And no, Taepo Dong does not mean Shooting the Workers.
Posted by: ed   2006-06-23 21:49  

#14  #13 What is the meaning of Taepo-dong in Korean?

I think Taepo means small & dong means penis
Posted by: classer   2006-06-23 20:51  

#13  What is the meaning of Taepo-dong in Korean?
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-06-23 15:06  

#12  Now refresh my memory. What Dems voted against this program?
Posted by: Clwilli   2006-06-23 14:51  

#11   more than 100 miles above the Pacific Ocean

Jeebus. Now that's a vicious terrier.
Posted by: 6   2006-06-23 12:17  

#10  Best is to take it out while its still on the pad. But other than stealth or spy sabotage, its not politically feasable.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-06-23 12:13  

#9  Still, better idea to take it out during the initial boost phase. Easier to target, esier to hit, and still close to enemy terriroty - and as a bonus in the Nork situation, it denies them telemetry that they need to validate that the staging and guidance works well enough to be a credible threat.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-06-23 12:12  

#8  I don't know if I remember right, but we probably owe a good bit of thanks to the Japanese on this program.

I think it's either their Radar or telemetry system that was finally able to feed the right info to our missiles.

A raised mug to all involved. I just hope we can translate this success to our land based portions of the ABM.

KEEP ON TRUCKIN'
Posted by: Anon4021   2006-06-23 10:03  

#7  Go ahead, launch NKorea. We need to keep testing and training anyway.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-06-23 09:30  

#6  Just in time for Taepodong Tuesday at the Juche Bar!
Posted by: Mike   2006-06-23 08:33  

#5  MSM headline:

SM-3 FAILS! To miss its target. Again.

That funny sound you hear is the "It'll never work!" crowd collectively grinding their teeth into powder...
Posted by: PBMcL   2006-06-23 01:09  

#4  Late model SM-2s can also intercept shorter range ballistic missiles in the atmosphere.
Posted by: ed   2006-06-23 00:29  

#3  Look down below for title Japanese Aegis and click to go see video of the Japanese Aegis.
Posted by: Sherry   2006-06-23 00:23  

#2  Damn that's awesome!
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-06-23 00:16  

#1  NK ready for an Aegis based splash?
Posted by: 3dc   2006-06-23 00:13  

00:00