You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
US mulls deploying anti-missile cruiser near Japan soon
2006-06-27
(KUNA) -- Washington is considering deploying the Navy's Aegis cruiser Shiloh, which is equipped with an advanced missile defense system, to areas around Japan as part of efforts to deal with North Korea's preparations to test-fire a long-range ballistic missile, Japanese media reported Monday. The deployment would move up the US government's original schedule of stationing the Shiloh in August at the US naval base in Yokosuka, south of Tokyo, Kyodo News Agency said, citing US government sources.

Japan has already mobilized an Aegis-equipped destroyer of the Maritime Self-Defense Force amid growing worries about North Korea's preparations to test fire a Taepodong-2 ballistic missile. The Shiloh would be deployed in two weeks at the earliest, according to the report. In an interceptor test last Thursday off Hawaii, a Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) interceptor fired by the Shiloh successfully shot down a warhead separated from a ballistic missile outside the earth's atmosphere. US President George W. Bush will make a final decision on the early deployment of the Shiloh and on whether to intercept the Taepodong-2, the report said.

Japan and the US are jointly developing an upgraded version of the SM-3 interceptor to make it capable of shooting down long-range intercontinental missiles. The joint project began after North Korea launched a Taepodong-1 missile in 1998, part of which flew over Japan into the Pacific Ocean. Pyongyang agreed on a missile-test moratorium a year later in 1999 -- a commitment it has upheld to date although it maintains the 1998 launch was a satellite-delivering multistage rocket.
Posted by:Fred

#12  Attacking it pre-launce would be an act of war. Once it's in boost phase and over open ocean, it's fair game.
Posted by: mojo   2006-06-27 15:10  

#11  lol, Kelly & LOD. Very good points. Actually, I prefer to kill it before it even gets off the ground and that way we don't have to worry about it (our defenses) missing.
Posted by: BA   2006-06-27 13:20  

#10  The New York Times would tell.....

and provide exact location, speed, armaments, etc. You know, its all in "the public interest."
Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden   2006-06-27 12:49  

#9  The New York Times would tell.....
Posted by: kelly   2006-06-27 12:48  

#8  We just don't announce we fired it if it misses!
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-06-27 10:32  

#7  Darth, I completly agree. The only worrisome thing is that our antimissile system is "still in beta" and stands a good chance of missing. That would make us a laughingstock.

That said, hell yes it would be enjoyable to see the launch, arc, oops 'boom'! Then a pic of an old grandma wagging her finger and saying "naughty boys"...
Posted by: jay-dubya   2006-06-27 09:59  

#6  I would just laugh my ass off if we shot down the Nork missle. That would be the ultimate diplomacy move while showing force.
"We took away your toy 'cus you been bad. Now go sit in time out!"
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-06-27 09:42  

#5  i figured the cruser was already there
Posted by: Greamp Elmavinter1163   2006-06-27 09:42  

#4  Better git movin. These boys don't fool around. When they decide to do something, they move fast. Remember when they busted the UN seals off the doors to the reprocessing facilities or whatever?
Posted by: grb   2006-06-27 03:15  

#3  Not ready apperently. I know I saw a test firing on TV a while back and it works. It's a chemical Laser mounted in a 747 or 767 airframe. It only takes a tiny hole and your missle is scattered scrap metal.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-06-27 02:52  

#2  Airborne Laser
Posted by: Uleating Flomosh9600   2006-06-27 02:02  

#1  Don't fergit the USAF flyboyz - China is reportedly sending submarines and its newest destroyers to the area, likely to protect = watch North Korea from the USA. NORTH KOREA can't lose by keeping silent - can claim yet another decadent American "mistake", proof of Amer-specific arrogance and bellicosity, one mistake of many Amer "mistakes" around the world post 9-11; vs de facto "act of war" against North Korea by destroying NK = anti-Chinese Chinese property.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-27 00:31  

00:00