You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Who's Behind the India Bombings?
2006-07-13
Even as the dead are still being counted in India's worst terrorist attack in more than a decade, suspicion has already fallen on Islamic terrorists — though not al-Qaeda.
Actually, they're on my Suspicious list, behind Lashkar and Jaish and before the local commies.
India is home to a Muslim insurgency in Kashmir, and earlier in the day militants killed eight people and injured 30 in five separate bomb attacks in the capital, Srinagar. And while no one said those same insurgents carried out Tuesday's rush-hour train attacks in Bombay — which police said killed at least 130 people and injured 260 — security sources told TIME they suspected a shadowy alliance of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) working with indigenous Indian Muslims from the banned Student Islamic Movemement of India (SIMI).
SIMI's another ISI tool.
SIMI detonated a total of nine bombs in Bombay during the course of 2003, killing close to 80 people and injuring hundreds more. The same loose grouping of Islamic radicals are also suspected of being behind a series of attacks in India in the last year that included three blasts in New Delhi last October that killed 60 and three more in the holy Hindu city of Varanasi in March this year, which killed 20, as well as smaller attacks in Bangalore and Hyderabad.

Ajay Sahni of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi said it was unlikely that there had been any trigger for the attacks. Rather this was an "ongoing war" against Hindu-majority India by South Asian Muslims. "It is a continuous process of preparing for attacks and carrying them out," he said. "When these people are able to bring something to fruition, they do it. The act itself is the objective. It says: 'We're here. And this is what we are going to do to you.'" In a paper published Monday, Institute research fellow Bibhu Prasad Routray warned that SIMI had been stepping up its operations in Bombay and the surrounding state of Maharashtra. He described several "SIMI strongholds" in the state, adding that the "seizure of 30 kilograms of RDX, 17 AK-47s and 50 hand grenades from Aurangabad and Malegaon [two Maharashtran towns] between May 9 and 12 and subsequent arrests of 11 LeT terrorists pointed to linkages between SIMI and the LeT."
Posted by:Fred

#5  

Image released by Indian Police today of a man identified as Sayyad Zabiuddin. Indian authorities named two men as the first suspects in this week's train bombings
Posted by: john   2006-07-13 15:08  

#4   Pakistan hand in Mumbai blasts

Exclusive information available with NDTV indicates that National Security Advisor told Cabinet Ministers that Pakistan's involvement was definite.

Investigators are searching for two men - Zabiuddin and Mohammad Faiyaz – believed to be the masterminds in the attacks. The third suspect Rahil, an expert in forging passports was said to be running a travel agency on Grant Road in Mumbai.
Posted by: john   2006-07-13 15:00  

#3  The lack of muslim interest in conventional education, the reliance on madrassas for boys, the non-education of girls, has severly affected their employment chances.
A school leaving certificate is needed for entry to the army for enlisted men. Indian universities are very competitive - it is easier to get into an Ivy league US college than one of the Indian IITs.

This lack of education is not India specific. Statistics from the UK show that muslims are at the bottom of all educational rankings (right below afro-carribean boys). If third generation muslim immigrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and India are all failing at school while their classmates from the same parts of India - but Hindu and Sikh - are topping the class then where is the problem?
Posted by: john   2006-07-13 06:39  

#2  During partition a large portion of the muslim elite opted for Pakistan. This included a significant proportion of muslim soldiers and officers, the professionals - doctors, lawyers etc, many businessmen.

This has skewed the socio-economic indicators of today's Indian muslims. They are now under-represented in the professions, the army etc, not because of any discrimination, but perhaps because the poorer muslims have not filled the vacancies left when their richer cousins migrated.

This hasn't stopped muslims from rising in the army (several Generals), or the professions, or business - the second richest Indian is Azam Premji, the founder of the Outsourcing IT company Wipro. The grandson of Jinnah is an Indian citizen, a wealthy industrialist in Bombay.

But it must have affected communities when the positive role models (like Musharraf's family) left.
Posted by: john   2006-07-13 06:31  

#1  Neocons?
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-07-13 06:16  

00:00