You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
McKinney's grip on district weakens
2006-07-24
U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney lost support last week in her political stronghold, south DeKalb County, forcing her into a runoff, an analysis of election results shows. Former DeKalb County Commissioner Hank Johnson, who surprised many with his strong showing in the Democratic primary, made inroads in the predominantly black neighborhoods where McKinney traditionally has enjoyed staunch support. And he carried many precincts in largely white north DeKalb, according to the analysis by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

The two will face each other in an Aug. 8 runoff. The winner will face Republican Catherine Davis, considered a long shot, in the November election. McKinney was expected to win Tuesday's primary easily, but she won 47 percent of the ballots cast to Johnson's 44 percent. Alpharetta businessman John F. Coyne III, received 8.5 percent. The AJC analysis looked at voter turnout in DeKalb, where most 4th District voters live. The AJC also compared Tuesday's election returns in 120 DeKalb precincts with the results of McKinney's 2002 race, which she lost to Denise Majette. (The Georgia Legislature drew new congressional lines in 2005, so only 120 precincts were the same in 2006 as in 2002.)

The analysis found:
• This year, 49 percent fewer voters cast ballots for McKinney than in 2002. That indicates those voters either did not cast ballots Tuesday, or voted for another candidate.

• Overall turnout was significantly lower this year than in 2002. Then, 47 percent of 4th District voters who live in DeKalb went to the polls; this year only 26 percent cast ballots.

• Support for McKinney dropped by an average of 4.5 percentage points across the 120 precincts. She experienced the biggest decline in south DeKalb precincts. In the precincts where McKinney was strongest in 2002, she still won majorities this year but by a lower percentage.

• Johnson had the strongest support in predominantly white north DeKalb, but he received a lower percentage of the vote in many of those precincts than Majette did in 2002. The third opponent, Coyne, received 10 to 20 percent of the vote in many of those precincts.
While the analysis gives some insight into what happened Tuesday, it's difficult to predict how many voters will go to polls for the runoff or how they will cast their ballots. Runoffs are known for very low voter turnouts.
Posted by:Fred

#19  That was purty good lynx.

Ummmm, really glad I didn't click it at work.
Posted by: xbalanke   2006-07-24 20:04  

#18  First time I saw it, I assumed it was photoshopped. Then I saw her on TV and realized the weird bug eyes and hair were authentic.

OK, let's put the two pix side by side and vote on it! :-)
Posted by: gorb   2006-07-24 19:49  

#17  Now, back to the topic at hand. This is EXTREMELY good news that South DeKalb (McKinney's strong districts) is not voting or throwing their support behind someone else. As the article mentions, it doesn't really mean a hill of beans for the runoff, but those 9 percentage points for Coyne will mostly go to her opponent (Johnson). He could very well win it. Unfortunately, whomever wins that primary wins the seat.
Posted by: BA   2006-07-24 19:47  

#16  That was purty good lynx.
Posted by: 6   2006-07-24 18:35  

#15  [sniff] .com would be so proud of you ...
Posted by: Steve White   2006-07-24 14:35  

#14  If you keep providing those links Champ Angeger5024, I can pitch my Viagra.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-07-24 12:22  

#13  Like I said I dont have a problem with it myself. But I work in Seattle and some of my -er- tolerant leftist co-workers might be 'offended' [by her --er-- charms] and file a complaint.

As for Helen... well those selfsame 'tolerant' co-workers might not might object but I would suffer irreversible optic nerve damage. Possibly insanity.

(Your right I should have known better then to follow the link -- at least from work. :).
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-07-24 11:04  

#12  I told you not to look. You do understand the honor system, right? :)

As for NSFW, would it still be a problem if that was a page of Helen Thomas pix? Wait, on second thought, scratch my eyes out belay that... LOL.
Posted by: Champ Angeger5024   2006-07-24 10:52  

#11  May we have a NSFW on the above?

I myself don't have a problem with it but you never know who might be walking past the cubicle.... Some people are just so stuck up...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-07-24 10:43  

#10  The link. Duh.
Posted by: Champ Angeger5024   2006-07-24 10:21  

#9  For john - nobody else look, okay?

When the rather buggy-eyed thing looks good. Really good.

Disclaimer: I was looking for Lee Remick pix and, somehow, I ended up here. I think it was a triple poison reverse with a full pike and 2.5 twists. Degree of difficulty: 400.62.
Posted by: Champ Angeger5024   2006-07-24 10:19  

#8  Quick, Fred, get that graphic into Photoshop and cross her eyes! :-)

No, the original is just fine.

First time I saw it, I assumed it was photoshopped. Then I saw her on TV and realized the weird bug eyes and hair were authentic.
Posted by: john   2006-07-24 10:14  

#7  Subject: Learning

The Ebonics word for the day......
is: OMELETTE

Let's use it in a sentence....

"You din vote for Cindy? I should pop yo ass fo what you jus din do, but omelette dis one slide."
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-07-24 09:50  

#6  She never quite had a grip on reality.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-07-24 08:19  

#5  Quick, Fred, get that graphic into Photoshop and cross her eyes! :-)
Posted by: gorb   2006-07-24 02:49  

#4  Oops - forgot to change "handle".
Posted by: DMFD   2006-07-24 02:42  

#3  Headline should read:

McKinney's grip on district sanity weakens
Posted by: John Kerry   2006-07-24 02:40  

#2  LOL, Iblis. Can't argue with you. All angles covered. LOL.
Posted by: Champ Angeger5024   2006-07-24 02:13  

#1  She's a crazy, dumb bitch. But...she's a crazy, dumb bitch.
Posted by: Iblis   2006-07-24 02:10  

00:00