You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democrats decry Maliki's comments on Israel
2006-07-26
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. congressional Democrats expressed alarm on Tuesday over Iraq's denunciation of Israel in the Middle East conflict, and some said Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's address to Congress should be canceled unless he apologizes.
Apologizes for what? He never promised to support Israel.
A group of about 20 House of Representatives Democrats sent a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert urging the Illinois Republican to secure an apology from Maliki or cancel the address on Wednesday to a joint meeting of Congress. Some said they planned to boycott the speech.

Hastert's spokesman, Ron Bonjean, said there was no intention of canceling Maliki's speech, and he accused Democrats of "political gamesmanship during an election year."

Iraq's U.S.-backed government denounced Israel's raids on Lebanon and Gaza. Maliki last week called for "the world to take quick stands to stop the Israeli aggression."
Meaning they're Arabs. It's a fact of life that very few Arabs are going to praise Israel for thrashing the Hezbies, even if they're scared of Iran. al-Maliki has his own problems, and saying a few words about the Zionists for domestic consumption is one less headache for him.
Senate Democrats in a letter to Maliki called his statements "very troubling" and asked for an explanation, but did not demand that his speech be canceled. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said Maliki, in his White House appearance with President George W. Bush, again failed to state his view of Hizbollah, which the United States deems a terrorist organization.

"We have spent hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq. We've lost more than 2,500 American soldiers, more than 20,000 wounded. We deserve that answer," Reid said.
He's not going to get one if Maliki is smart. Trashing the Hezbies publicly will inflame a lot of Shi'a at home, and in case Harry Reid hadn't noticed (or doesn't care), things are a little difficult back home.
House Democrats in their letter to Hastert cited reports that Iraqi leaders were "increasingly influenced" by Iran, and said the "goal of the invasion in Iraq was not to remove one threat in favor of another."
Maliki isn't a threat, he's a politican who can count noses, as opposed to Saddam who just cut them off. Back home, the noses don't want any kind comments about Israel. Fact of life.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California said unless Maliki "disavows his critical comments of Israel and condemns terrorism, it is inappropriate to honor him with a joint meeting of Congress."
As if Pelosi would give a damn about Israel. Her supporters certainly don't.
Most Republicans said Democrats were making unrealistic demands, and said Congress should support the struggling leader as Iraq faces mounting sectarian violence. "For him to take a strong stance that's perceived as pro-Israel where he's from is very difficult," Kansas Republican Sen. Sam Brownback said.

Senate Republican Whip Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called the Democrats' statements "an insult to a duly-elected leader."

But ungrateful Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Arlen Specter said he had "serious reservations" about Maliki's speech, and said it was "outrageous to accuse Israel of aggression when Hizbollah has been sitting on their northern border with a knife at Israel's throat for years."
It isn't Iraq's fight. If Saddam were still in power, he'd be shipping guns 'n' ammo to the Hezbies. Maliki's confined himself to a few comments. I consider that a substantial improvement.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  maliki's foreign minister has stated that Hez b allah shouldn't have crossed the border.

Give the Dems some credit. They may have bad motives but it may have come out right anyway.
Posted by: mhw   2006-07-26 22:09  

#9  Until Arab/Muslim peoples in the area accept Israel's right to exist where it is, we're gonna be fighting this war with Arabs/Muslims. That elephant in the room needs to be named.
Uncomfortable to say, but nonetheless true.

As long as every country in the area buys into the notion that Jews deserve to die and that the state of Israel must be eliminated, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine will be minefields and others will be drawn into the fight. And since our Western peers are so reluctant to ever fight for anything, Americans, Israelis and a handful of other friends will be the only ones making sure that Jews aren't finally exterminated by the greater Muslim community, whose hatred of Israel and support of Islamic militants is well represented in Maliki's comments.

Maliki is not courageous-he's just clever. His silence about his hatred for Israel would have made no one safe. He, like his brethren, is playing a double game and we would be fools to believe he has anything in mind other than elimination of Jews and their state, Israel.

Europe's unhealthy guilt is steering the course of events; if there were more support for the state of Israel from that "international community" and its servant force of journalists, Arab and Muslim states would feel greater pressure to accept Israel. Unfortunately, the gargantuan guilt that Europe bears for the Holocaust is not as great as their wish to "win" Arab/Muslim approval for purely financial reasons.

In the war on terror, those who openly fight against hatred of Jews are among the heroic. Most of the time it's Pubs with that courage; this time, it was 2 Dems.
Posted by: Jules in the Hinterlands   2006-07-26 12:37  

#8  Stupid of Maliki to comment when his own laundry is at the brink of civil war. I trust someone pointed that out to his ass.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-07-26 10:22  

#7  Once again the dems put politics above the good of the country. It's definitely in the country's interest that the government of Iraq succeed, but not in the dems interest. They could give a sh*t about the USA, and seem to have only one thought morning noon and night: How do I play this so I can keep my ass in power?

As to Maliki's comments, you have to admit he's asshat as a politician. Best thing would have been to keep his mouth shut, especially considering he was about to address a joint session of Congress.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-07-26 08:27  

#6  Harry was on the radio this morning. All he wants to know is, "Does al-Maliki support Hezbollah or not? Yes or no?"

Harry - do you support President Bush? Yes or no?

Whadda fool. Up for re-election, is he?
Posted by: Bobby   2006-07-26 06:31  

#5  The Sunnis and moderate Muslims have got to understand that any defeat = destruction of Israel does NOT mean the Radical Iranians = Radic Shia view Sunnis as equals or in benevolent compassionate friendly co-existence, or that Sunnis Islam will escape post-Israel persecution, repression, or even genocide by Radical Iran. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASK FOR, SUNNIS AND MODERS, YOU JUST MIGHT GET IT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-07-26 03:14  

#4  LOL. The complexity of the world obviously exceeds your limited capacity to comprehend.
Posted by: cruiser   2006-07-26 01:56  

#3  Maliki's playing to his crowd...

Except that, oops, America is seen as Israel's biggest backer. And, oh yeah, Israel's response is seen as part of the wider war on terror. Soooo...if Israel is the aggressor, then that means...no, wait, that's not it...
Posted by: Hupuse Snamp6542   2006-07-26 01:45  

#2  This from the party that put Carter and Moore in the convention skybox. Maliki's playing to his crowd, just as the Donks play to theirs. Hard to tell them apart at times. Most times. Pretty much all the time.
Posted by: Champ Angeger5024   2006-07-26 01:28  

#1  He should've followed Jordan's and Egypt's example.

Or said nothing at all. Now that would've been an improvement.
Posted by: Hupuse Snamp6542   2006-07-26 00:37  

00:00