You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Rome's conference fails to reach anticipated truce in Lebanon
2006-07-27
(KUNA) -- The international conference on the Lebanon-Israel crisis, held here Wednesday, failed to reach the anticipated agreement for an immediate truce to block the continuous Israeli aggression against Lebanon. After two hours of delay, Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema announced the conclusion of the conference with a mere agreement to continue efforts toward reaching a ceasefire. D'Alema said in a press conference following the meeting that he anticipated an immediate truce as several participants insisted; however, he questioned the viability of such a demand.

D'Alema stressed that participants shared willingness to collectively work toward reaching an urgent ceasefire. He said an attempt for a truce required pressuring all of the conflicting parties, noting that the conference started pressuring Israel by demanding it to respect civil establishments and preserve civilian lives. D'Alema said that holding the conference has been a crucial achievement by itself due to the high level of international participation, noting that the main purpose of the conference was to express solidarity with Lebanon. D'Alema averred that participant would continue working together toward an initiative that would include all direct and indirect parties of the conflict.

Speaking at the news conference, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice affirmed the participants' willingness to urgently end violence in the Middle East. The Italian deputy premier and foreign minister stressed that the anticipated truce should be permanent, complete and able to endure. The conference's final communique called on Israel for self-restraint, welcoming Tel Aviv's decision to secure humanitarian corridors and allow flights to land at Rafiq Hariri Airport for humanitarian purposes. The final communique also expressed the international community's deep concerns regarding the dramatic situation in Lebanon and violence in the Middle East, pledging to provide urgent humanitarian aid and to discuss practical steps to establish a free and independent Lebanon with sovereignty over its lands.
Posted by:Fred

#5  "Nonetheless, it seems that Annan's plan did not appeal to influential western participants."

Gee...I wonder why? Perhaps it's that whole prisoner swap thingy rather then the unconditional release of the Israeli soldiers. Or maybe it's Hizbullah's refusal to disarm under UN#1559? Those damn "western participants" sure are belligerent!
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-07-27 08:22  

#4  "Why are they so afraid of Hezballah?"

gorb,

I answered this a while back. The answer is not what you think it is. Read #15 on this link.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2006-07-27 07:32  

#3  "Please, Dr. Rice, you're being unreasonable. What's wrong with the status quo? I wanna go home and say the problem was "solved" in one day!"

As far as I'm concerned, she the biggest balls there! The rest have peppercorns. Why are they so afraid of Hezballah?
Posted by: gorb   2006-07-27 02:54  

#2  Why exactly was a truce the anticipated result when, in the list of participants in the conference, the principals involved in the conflict were not even present?

Natter, natter, natter, indeed.
Posted by: Scott R   2006-07-27 00:40  

#1  What a hilarious graphic. I'm laughing so hard, I can't even concentrate on this article. Come to think of it, I don't need to read the article. The graphic sums it up.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2006-07-27 00:23  

00:00