| Submit your comments on this article |
| India-Pakistan |
| Look what Pak has had to swallow for its F-16 supplies |
| 2006-07-30 |
| But consider what Pak President Pervez Musharraf has had to swallow, according to testimony by US Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs John F Hillen to the House International Relations Committee, the same panel that first voted for the nuclear deal. • US government has done a “security site survey” of Pak bases and facilities, drawn up security plans of these sites where the F-16s will be located and it has been put in the deal that Pakistan will comply with the ‘‘approved security plans’’. • US presence to ‘‘monitor compliance’’ with the security plan and a ‘‘very enhanced end-use monitoring programme’’. • Two-man rule for access to equipment and restricted areas, wherein Pakistan cannot use these F-16s in exercises and operations with third countries without prior approval of the US. • The planes are not equipped with technology that would allow them to carry out offensive action to penetrate airspace of another country that is ‘‘highly defended’’. They cannot deliver nuclear weapons. • F-16 maintenance and parts storage has to be in dedicated facilities run by Air Force personnel—and not sub-contractors—which are part of the ‘‘overall surveillance plan.’’ • No supply of the aircraft unless US finds Pakistan ‘‘fully compliant’’ with the security plan requirements. • Routine access to F-16 aircraft also restricted to Pakistan Air Force personnel pre-approved by the US. And only the PAF can perform maintenance, no Pakistan contractors, industry or third countries to be involved. “The security plan greatly exceeds US Air Force standards for our own security of these weapons systems,’’ Hillen said while urging the House panel to approve the sale. Even this did not fully convince the members as Hillen then went on to say there was more which he would discuss in detail in a ‘‘closed session’’. |
| Posted by:john |
| #4 US government has done a “security site survey” of Pak bases and facilities, drawn up security plans of these sites where the F-16s will be located and it has been put in the deal that Pakistan will comply with the ‘‘approved security plans’’. I wonder if this includes a brief tally of where their nuclear weapons are stored. You know, just in case we have to prevent them from falling into the hands of |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-07-30 18:12 |
| #3 Exactly what advantages has the US secured from the post 9-11 relations with Pakistan? |
| Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550 2006-07-30 17:47 |
| #2 This is typical FMS. The reason for the tight monitoring is largly because the ground crews, at the direction of the generals, will strip and sell the parts off the aircraft. All the parts in the warehouse would be gone is a week without US gatekeepers. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-07-30 09:22 |
| #1 no discussion of the hidden C4 packages in the tail that can be remotely triggered by USAF monitors, or automatically by entrance into China airspace? |
| Posted by: Frank G 2006-07-30 08:32 |