You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Voters can see through McKinney
2006-07-31
In a few precincts of American politics, voters still applaud the utterly futile gesture of defiance, the confrontational rhetoric that pleases only true believers, the fist shaken in the face of an opponent who neither notices nor cares. Apparently, such empty gestures — signs of impotence, really — have come to be seen as "speaking truth to power." That helps to explain the remaining, if faltering, appeal of U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.), whose supporters are nothing if not naïve. They have turned Theodore Roosevelt's maxim — "Speak softly and carry a big stick" — upside down.

McKinney speaks loudly but has accomplished little in her 12 years in Congress. That's because her outrageous rhetoric and loopy antics distance her not only from the Republican majority, but even from many of her Democratic colleagues. She has few allies. That number grew yet smaller after her most recent controversy, a very public imbroglio prompted by a March skirmish with a Capitol police officer. He says he didn't recognize her; she was wearing a new hairstyle but was without the lapel pin usually worn by members of Congress. When he stopped her, the officer said, she slugged him with her cellphone. She denounced him for alleged racial profiling and "the inappropriate touching and stopping of me — a female, black congresswoman."

While the regrettable episode further endeared her to that dwindling population which sees such incidents as proof of her cojones, it reminded many colleagues — and constituents — that she is a public official who tends more toward cheap theatrics than common sense. It's no wonder she finds herself struggling to retain her 4th District seat, consigned to an Aug. 8 runoff with former DeKalb County Commissioner Hank Johnson.
Posted by:Fred

#22  Then there's that female governor from Loiusiana, Whatserface. The whole world knows she is incompetant. Christine Todd Whitmann was also a nitwit, Madaline Albright, Janet Reno, they're all over the place.
I don't think it's a sex thing, but they reach such positions for all the wrong reasons.
For example; how many men became company vice president because of their wardrobe, graceful demeanor, or good looks ? NONE !
Sleeping with the boss ? Priceless.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-07-31 15:16  

#21  What about Olimpia Snow and that other female senator from Maine ?
Both lefty losers.
Hey Maine, what's up ? Anybody home wearing pants ?
Posted by: wxjames   2006-07-31 15:09  

#20  RD,

The list was double pasted. The guys I've listed total 31.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-31 15:07  

#19  Well, you have to look at women's voting patterns too. The female vote elected Bill Clinton twice. Yes, Bill Clinton, philanderer in chief, of all people.

I can't make any good theoretical arguments against women's suffrage, but I can make some pretty compelling practical ones...
Posted by: Iblis   2006-07-31 15:01  

#18  young Nimble plz check arithmetic as you may have missed the sum of House and Senate members and double dipped on a few....

The men? 7% (31 of 454)

btw do not trust my count :-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
de HOUSE.. Vacancies (2); total 435
de Senate 100

total 535

your list 61
subtract the double dippage -8

bal, the ratio 53 / 535 =_______


Rep. Hastings, Alcee (DEM-FL-23rd)
Sen. Harkin, Tom (DEM-IA)
Sen. Byrd, Robert (DEM-WV)
Sen. Schumer, Charles (DEM-NY)
Rep. Frank, Barney (DEM-MA-4th)
Rep. Moran, James (DEM-VA-8th)
Sen. Feingold, Russ (DEM-WI)
Rep. Murtha, John (DEM-PA-12th)
Sen. Voinovich, George (REP-OH)
Sen. Reid, Harry (DEM-NV)

Posted by: RD   2006-07-31 12:16  

#17  Actually, It loooks like a paste error because I listed everybody twice in the male column. I've chewed up enough bandwidth with the error, so I'll leave it those wth Excel to resort it themselves unless there's a flood of demand for a correction. The paste error starts after the first Tom Harkin and goes to Sen. Kennedy.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-31 11:33  

#16  NS, you've listed Nadler and Harkin twice. That inconsequential gaffe made me think of Hedley Lamarr in "Blazing Saddles" interviewing the psycho nutball whose credentials for joining the gang were "rape, murder, arson and rape." Hmmm...
Posted by: mac   2006-07-31 11:17  

#15  All yours, but the real legwork was finding Congress.org
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-31 10:40  

#14  NS, that's some impressive legwork. Mind if I borrow that for my blog?
Posted by: Jonathan   2006-07-31 10:38  

#13  OK, 13% (11 of 84) of the women in congress are dingbats. I have avoided people whom I simply detest, Sen. Clinton, and those with whom I disagree but who are not dingbats, Sen. Feinstein. Some will disagree. My nominees:

Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila (DEM-TX-18th)
Rep. McKinney, Cynthia (DEM-GA-4th)
Sen. Mikulski, Barbara (DEM-MD)
Rep. Lee, Barbara (DEM-CA-9th)
Rep. Lofgren, Zoe (DEM-CA-16th)
Sen. Murray, Patty (DEM-WA)
Rep. Waters, Maxine (DEM-CA-35th)
Rep. Woolsey, Lynn (DEM-CA-6th)
Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes (DEM-DC-AL)
Rep. Pelosi, Nancy (DEM-CA-8th)
Sen. Boxer, Barbara (DEM-CA)

What is noteworthy is how many are from California. I think California has a high propensity to send dingbats, male and female, and a high propensity to send women. This creates a disparity with the rest of the country and gives women a bad name when only women from California should have a bad name.

The men? 7% (31 of 454)

Rep. Conyers, John (DEM-MI-14th)
Sen. Hagel, Chuck (REP-NE)
Sen. Durbin, Richard (DEM-IL)
Rep. Hastings, Alcee (DEM-FL-23rd)
Sen. Harkin, Tom (DEM-IA)
Rep. Conyers, John (DEM-MI-14th)
Sen. Hagel, Chuck (REP-NE)
Sen. Durbin, Richard (DEM-IL)
Rep. Hastings, Alcee (DEM-FL-23rd)
Sen. Harkin, Tom (DEM-IA)
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold (DEM-NY-8th)
Sen. Specter, Arlen (REP-PA)
Rep. Sanders, Bernard (IND-VT-AL)
Rep. McDermott, Jim (DEM-WA-7th)
Rep. Stark, Fortney (DEM-CA-13th)
Sen. Dodd, Christopher (DEM-CT)
Sen. Schumer, Charles (DEM-NY)
Sen. Byrd, Robert (DEM-WV)
Rep. Frank, Barney (DEM-MA-4th)
Rep. Markey, Edward (DEM-MA-7th)
Rep. Miller, George (DEM-CA-7th)
Sen. McCain, John (REP-AZ)
Sen. Rockefeller, John (DEM-WV)
Rep. Moran, James (DEM-VA-8th)
Sen. Feingold, Russ (DEM-WI)
Rep. Murtha, John (DEM-PA-12th)
Rep. Rangel, Charles (DEM-NY-15th)
Rep. Kucinich, Dennis (DEM-OH-10th)
Rep. Waxman, Henry (DEM-CA-30th)
Sen. Lautenberg, Frank (DEM-NJ)
Sen. Reid, Harry (DEM-NV)
Sen. Voinovich, George (REP-OH)
Sen. Levin, Carl (DEM-MI)
Rep. Meehan, Marty (DEM-MA-5th)
Rep. Lewis, Jerry (REP-CA-41st)
Sen. Kennedy, Edward (DEM-MA)
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold (DEM-NY-8th)
Sen. Specter, Arlen (REP-PA)
Rep. Sanders, Bernard (IND-VT-AL)
Rep. McDermott, Jim (DEM-WA-7th)
Rep. Stark, Fortney (DEM-CA-13th)
Sen. Dodd, Christopher (DEM-CT)
Sen. Schumer, Charles (DEM-NY)
Sen. Byrd, Robert (DEM-WV)
Rep. Frank, Barney (DEM-MA-4th)
Rep. Markey, Edward (DEM-MA-7th)
Rep. Miller, George (DEM-CA-7th)
Sen. McCain, John (REP-AZ)
Sen. Rockefeller, John (DEM-WV)
Rep. Moran, James (DEM-VA-8th)
Sen. Feingold, Russ (DEM-WI)
Rep. Murtha, John (DEM-PA-12th)
Rep. Rangel, Charles (DEM-NY-15th)
Rep. Kucinich, Dennis (DEM-OH-10th)
Rep. Waxman, Henry (DEM-CA-30th)
Sen. Lautenberg, Frank (DEM-NJ)
Sen. Reid, Harry (DEM-NV)
Sen. Voinovich, George (REP-OH)
Sen. Levin, Carl (DEM-MI)
Rep. Meehan, Marty (DEM-MA-5th)
Rep. Lewis, Jerry (REP-CA-41st)

Here the heavy hitters are from the east, W Va, MI, and MA. I'm sure I'm missing some.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-07-31 10:06  

#12  Here's the test: go through the female Sens./Reps. and count how many moonbats there are. Then divide by the total number of females. Do the same thing for the males. Compare notes. Maybe I'm way off base but I don't think so. Every one of the women I mentioned in my earlier entry is a certified lefty nutter. Off the top of my head I can think of maybe a few more men who are equally notorious as certified loons but I think the overall percentage is considerably lower. My apologies to Swamp Blondie and particularly Trailing Wife for any ruffled feathers; I'd gladly vote for either of them for any elected position. That said, it still seems to me that the vast majority of the women I know of holding elected positions in U.S. politics are serious moonbats, and at a higher rate than men.
Posted by: mac   2006-07-31 08:53  

#11  How can you see through nine layers of fat?
Posted by: Raj   2006-07-31 08:26  

#10  The first problem is that one gets to be a Congressman not by a display of intelligence, but by name recognition. The reason for this is that as free men and women, we can and will vote. Nobody can convince me that my vote is equal to Jane or John Doe who know nothing about politics and government. I vote with my brain, usually against some party wonk who will dip his fat hand into the money bag as soon as we look away. The search for good men and women to run for office takes a back seat to party power.
Perhaps we're doomed.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-07-31 08:09  

#9  Seems like 95% of the females in government are morons while only 93% of the males are. Confidence limits would indicate that both groups are morons about the same amount. McKinney rises above moronic; she is a perfect idiot. Very, very rarely is anything perfect.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-07-31 07:47  

#8  I would think that womens general preference for collectivism, and the rise of fascism in countries that gave women the vote needs further study.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2006-07-31 07:17  

#7  Mac may be onto something. Seems like 95% of the females in government are morons while only 93% of the males are.
Posted by: glenmore   2006-07-31 07:15  

#6  mac, does that mean you think brilliant minds like Murtha, Ted Kennedy, Buchanan, Sharpton, John F'n Kerry and Kucinich are representatives of male brainpower? Or just an indication that we shouldn't let Northerners vote? ;)
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-07-31 07:11  

#5  With those eyes, she can probably see through you, too! :-)

Cynthia, you heard it wrong, it's not "cross your eyes and dot your tees".

Now can we run that graphic through photoshop? :-)
Posted by: gorb   2006-07-31 01:56  

#4  Y'mean she's black?

I'da never guessed.
Posted by: Glomort Hupelet6713   2006-07-31 01:18  

#3  Do you often display such wisdom as this, mac dear?
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-07-31 01:16  

#2  "Voters Can See Through McKinney"

Don't care much for the graphic language
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-31 01:06  

#1  Have any of you ever wondered why we've got so many truly stupid/ignorant/evil women in Congress? When I see the likes of McKinney, Feinstein, Boxer, Clinton, Pelosi, Kaptur, Waters, Murray etc., etc., I begin to think we might well have made a mistake by giving women the vote. Granted there are a few decent female elected officials out there (Kay Bailey Hutchinson comes to mind), and the brilliantly shining example of Margaret Thatcher stands out like the Eddystone Light, but by and large it appears they, as a group, have more damned fools than the men do. Anybody got an answer for that?
Posted by: mac   2006-07-31 00:39  

00:00