You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Evidence Mounts that Kana "Massacre" Was a Fake
2006-08-03
The world awoke Sunday to the news that an Israeli airstrike killed 57 Lebanese civilians, leading Israel to stop airstrikes for 2 days - but evidence indicates the "massacre" may have been a fraud. The supposed massacre caused a major turnabout in world diplomacy. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice suddenly canceled her plans to fly to Beirut, saying "my work towards a ceasefire is really here [in Jerusalem] today." The implication was clearly that the onus was now upon Israel. French President Jacques Chirac condemned Israel's "unjustified action which demonstrates more than ever the need for an immediate ceasefire," Jordan's King Abdullah called it an "ugly crime," and other world leaders echoed these sentiments.

Though Israel emphasized that Hizbullah was to blame for waging its rocket war against Israel from within a civilian population, Foreign Ministry officials repeated their "deep regret at the loss of innocent life in the campaign against Hizbullah," and were forced to promise a "thorough and comprehensive examination." However, the incident may have been all one big fraud, staged by Arab elements for the world media in order to lead precisely to the situation described above.

The central piece of evidence leading to this conclusion is the fact, mentioned by IDF officials from the very beginning, that the building collapsed a full seven hours after the Israel Air Force bombing. Why, then, would the residents inside not have been evacuated in the meantime? As Brig.-Gen. Amir Eshel of the Israeli Air Force told reporters Sunday night, “It is difficult for me to believe that they waited eight hours to evacuate it.” Without additional evidence, Eshel merely left open the possibility that Hizbullah terrorists, or explosives they left behind, caused the explosion.
Posted by:Steve

#17  Christiane-best moustache
Posted by: RD   2006-08-03 23:34  

#16  Christiane-War porno star.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-03 21:18  

#15  Christiane - war slut
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-03 20:18  

#14  Yuk to that MSNBC story - standard drivel from AP and Al-Reuters and not a single word about the big story circulating around; that those kids might well have been put in that building by the Hizbollocks swine.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2006-08-03 19:21  

#13  Well, someone needs to tell MSNBC, because of 11:11 Eastern time, they still had a heartwrenching story of a mother pulling her little girl out of the wreckage, and of course, it's the Jews' fault.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-08-03 19:18  

#12  Nope...You guys are all wrong. I read the Daily Kos last night and he insists this another "Dan Rather-gate", and the right wing blogs are trying to cover for Israel. Puts the Rantburgers right up there with UFO-freaks, and other conspiracy nuts.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-08-03 19:08  

#11  I nominate charles enderlin, France 2 teevee channel's permanent envoy to Israel, and msm enabler of the pallywood al durah blood libel which has sowed so much hate in the middle east and elsewhere.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-08-03 16:41  

#10  "Robert Fisk can be "victim" #1. Any other nominees?"

I nominate Christiane Amanpour!

-M



Posted by: Manolo   2006-08-03 16:32  

#9  Israel taking out a few dozen reporters would cause a stink in newsrooms around the world, but would do wonders for "clearing the air". Robert Fisk can be "victim" #1. Any other nominees?
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-08-03 15:36  

#8  Yup.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-08-03 12:20  

#7  So what, no amount of evidence to the contrary will affect the prevailing memes.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-08-03 11:56  

#6  Oh, how horrible that those eeeevil JOOOOOS committed a terrible slaughter in Jenin Kana! We're SO LUCKY that the intrepid, unbiased MSM is right there watching to make certain that the absolute, unvarnished, unequivocal truth gets out to the world--just like they did about Jenin!
/sarcasm off
Posted by: mac   2006-08-03 11:36  

#5  Americans and Westerners are not used to dealing with carefully orchestrated and large-scale deception of this kind.

Actually I think Americans and Westerners have seen this sort of nonsense since the cold war started. 1984 is all about rewriting history.

The Useful idiots either don't report it or they turn off their bull$hit filters because of multicultural brainwashing.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2006-08-03 11:31  

#4  Actually, my dear Shong Sheager8147, the argument has been made, loudly and repeatedly, since the invasion of Iraq in 2003 that the reporters and journalists of the mainstream media have been witting or unwitting catspaws of the enemy -- surely you remember the fuss about Dan Rather's little investigative contretemps vis a vis President Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard? I find it odd that you've only just become aware of this. But then there is an election coming up in a few months, as you said, so perhaps that explains your current preternatural acuity.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-03 11:20  

#3  Americans and Westerners are not used to dealing with carefully orchestrated and large-scale deception of this kind.

I dunno; I think 'Afghan wedding party' featuring an antiaircraft gun was our first clue.
Posted by: Raj   2006-08-03 10:46  

#2  SS1847, I can never figure out why the Left is so incoherent. Constructing an argument is not that hard. My daughter managed it around age 7. So what's with the meme>meme>meme I've made an argument silliness.

And BTW, the faux irony is laughable.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-08-03 10:26  

#1  "Americans and Westerners are not used to dealing with carefully orchestrated and large-scale deception of this kind. It is time that it be recognized as a weapon of warfare, and an extremely potent one at that."

And what do you thing the enemy has been doing for years in Iraq? Now that the possibility exists that by playing with the anti-Israeli terrorists in Lebanon rather than the anti-American/Iraqi terrorists in Iraq, you might, just might, alienate your Friends of Israel sponsors, you 'discover' you might be used to further the cause of the enemy? The feigned surprise is rather unbecoming. And an election is coming up in November. How coincidental.
Posted by: Shong Sheager8147   2006-08-03 09:54  

00:00