You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
DeLay's Name to Stay on Texas Ballot, Court Rules
2006-08-04
A federal appeals court ruled that former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's name must remain on the Nov. 7 ballot even though he withdrew from the race for his Texas congressional seat. The decision, which affirmed a prior ruling, may force DeLay to either campaign for the Houston-area seat he wanted to abandon or concede it to Democratic candidate Nick Lampson.

``In situations such as the one before this court, a replacement candidate cannot appear on the ballot if the original candidate merely withdraws,'' Judge Fortunato Benavides wrote for the three-judge panel. The ruling is a setback for the Texas Republican Party, which argued that it should be able to replace DeLay because he withdrew from the race and announced he was moving to Virginia after he won the March 7 party primary.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Somewhere, the ghost of "Landslide Lyndon" is chuckling...
Posted by: mojo   2006-08-04 17:39  

#5  The Dems reaped what they sowed.......

snicker
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2006-08-04 13:04  

#4  Didn't DeLay ask to be removed from the ballot because he was an ineligible candidate, having officially 'moved' to Washington? As such, if he was to win re-election would he not be ineligible to serve? I would think he does not even have enough time before the election to re-establish Sugarland as his legal residence. What happens if an ineligible candidate wins? Does the governor appoint a replacement? Do they hold a special election? Does the second-place finisher get the office?

Posted by: glenmore   2006-08-04 12:15  

#3  Well, he should stay on the ballot, since he didn't bother to resign in time. This is the same thing that happened 2 yearz ago with Torricelli and Lautenburg. The difference is that New Joizy, being Democrat, is far more corrupt and will break any law to make sure they keep power.
Posted by: Jackal   2006-08-04 10:31  

#2  It's just politix, which in Texas is fairly hardball. That's how DeLay was cornered and forced to drop out.

Texans aren't going to take to the streets to tar and feather Benavides and the Publicans will either run DeLay and win or run him and accept the loss as a tradeoff -- they succeeded with the redistricting on balance.

Bumping off judges, even the ones you don't like, is maybe acceptable politix in Baghdad, but it's not here. Let the party handle it.
Posted by: Fred   2006-08-04 09:53  

#1  The good people of Texas should inflict high speed pain on 2 judges and one prosecutor. That would send a message from all Americans, to all assholes who would phalk with the election process. Hands off, or die young.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-08-04 09:10  

00:00