| Submit your comments on this article |
| Fifth Column |
| The history of "peace" movements |
| 2006-08-05 |
| by Thomas Sowell One of the many failings of our educational system is that it sends out into the world people who cannot tell rhetoric from reality. They have learned no systematic way to analyze ideas, derive their implications and test those implications against hard facts. "Peace" movements are among those who take advantage of this widespread inability to see beyond rhetoric to realities. Few people even seem interested in the actual track record of so-called "peace" movements -- that is, whether such movements actually produce peace or war. Take the Middle East. People are calling for a cease-fire in the interests of peace. But there have been more cease-fires in the Middle East than anywhere else. If cease-fires actually promoted peace, the Middle East would be the most peaceful region on the face of the earth instead of the most violent. Was World War II ended by cease-fires or by annihilating much of Germany and Japan? Make no mistake about it, innocent civilians died in the process. Indeed, American prisoners of war died when we bombed Germany. There is a reason why General Sherman said "war is hell" more than a century ago. But he helped end the Civil War with his devastating march through Georgia -- not by cease fires or bowing to "world opinion" and there were no corrupt busybodies like the United Nations to demand replacing military force with diplomacy. There was a time when it would have been suicidal to threaten, much less attack, a nation with much stronger military power because one of the dangers to the attacker would be the prospect of being annihilated. "World opinion," the U.N. and "peace movements" have eliminated that deterrent. An aggressor today knows that if his aggression fails, he will still be protected from the full retaliatory power and fury of those he attacked because there will be hand-wringers demanding a cease fire, negotiations and concessions. Go read the rest. |
| Posted by:Mike |
| #3 that ceasefire in Korea's done so well.... |
| Posted by: Frank G 2006-08-05 15:59 |
| #2 When they do bring peace its temporary peace at the expense of long term solutions. Basically the cease-fire that lets bad people rearm rather than be destroyed for starting the war in the first place. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2006-08-05 15:12 |
| #1 "Peace" movements don't bring peace but war. Thats it in a nutshell. And so very true! |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2006-08-05 11:57 |