| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| New Israeli General Oversees Lebanon Offensive |
| 2006-08-09 |
| JERUSALEM (AP) - The commander of the Israeli military on Tuesday appointed his deputy to oversee Israel's battles in Lebanon, a dramatic mid-offensive shift sidelining the head of the northern command. The military announced the appointment of Maj. Gen. Moshe Kaplinksi in a statement on Tuesday. Israeli media linked it to plans to intensify the offensive in Lebanon as well as to mounting public criticism of the army's handling of the conflict with Hezbollah guerrillas. Though the military denied it, the appointment looked like a shake-up of the top command on the Lebanon front in the midst of a campaign, a highly unusual move. Writing in the Haaretz daily, veteran military analyst Zeev Schiff said the new appointment signaled serious command problems. "Clearly, the change in the command leadership is not good for Adam personally," he wrote, referring to the head of the northern command, Maj. Gen. Udi Adam. "But it also sends a negative signal to the army and the public at large." The last time a similar switch was made was during the 1973 Mideast war, when generals in the army reserves, including former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, were sent to the southern command to effectively take over from the general in charge, Shmuel Gorodish, in the battle against Egypt. The army statement said the chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz, retained "complete confidence" in Adam, and the military would not comment further on the reasons for Kaplinski's appointment. But Adam was clearly dispirited by the news. Asked by Israel TV whether he would resign, Adam said he did not intend to quit while the fighting still raged, but said he would "consider his position" if it became clear he was being supplanted. "At this stage, one has to rise above it," he said. "I have to keep my head clear for the war. There are soldiers in the field who are fighting with courage ... soldiers are being killed, I don't think I can abandon them now." |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #5 It's looking more like it with every leak. A lousy way to run a war. If they've lost confidence in him, sack him. If not, leave him alone. What a message to the guys underneath; you can be commanded in combat by a guy we don't even want to talk to. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-08-09 10:49 |
| #4 They're both Major Generals, so unless Kaplinksi has seniority, I would say it does indicate (partial) relief of Adam. |
| Posted by: Jackal 2006-08-09 10:43 |
| #3 Where's a Patton-like soldier when we need him? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2006-08-09 09:37 |
| #2 Olmert and his lefty incompetents had better do something, Sharon 's war on Israeli settlers was run better. Easier to destroy their homes. |
| Posted by: SamAdamsky 2006-08-09 08:46 |
| #1 Another possibility is that this signals a very significant expansion of operations. When you commit a much larger force, it is generally commanded by a more senior officer. So what we might be seeing here is the command infrastructure being put into place for a much larger force. It could be that Adam will still command a force the size he is now, with another officer commanding another force and both reporting to Kaplinksi. This would tend to lead me to speculate that a new command might be formed to thrust into the Bekaa while Adam controls Southern Lebanon. You would possibly also place a more senior commander in the operation if you were concerned that your actions might spark a widening of the conflict such as possibly causing Syria to make a move. |
| Posted by: crosspatch 2006-08-09 02:38 |