You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Lamont stunned by partisanship
2006-08-14
WASHINGTON - Democratic Senate nominee Ned Lamont, the anti-war candidate who toppled Sen. Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut primary, says he was surprised by Lieberman and Vice President Dick Cheney’s claims that his victory could embolden terrorists. “My God, here we have a terrorist threat against hearth and home, and the very first thing that comes out of their mind is how can we turn this to partisan advantage. I find that offensive,” Lamont said in an interview Sunday with The Associated Press.
Awwwww, the poo' widdle Dhimmicwat is all upset, is he?
After British officials disclosed they had thwarted a terrorist airline bombing plot on Thursday, Lieberman warned that Lamont’s call for a phased-withdrawal of troops from Iraq would be “taken as a tremendous victory” by terrorists.
Thus reminding everyone that Lieberman is for standing up to terrorists, and Lamont isn't.
Cheney on Wednesday had suggested that Lamont’s victory might encourage “the al-Qaida types” who want to “break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task.”
That's a '#1' on the 1 - 10 scale, Ned. I think when Mr. Cheney gets to a '#7' you'll be messing your shorts ...
Lamont said Lieberman’s swipe at his candidacy “sounded an awful lot” like Cheney. “It surprised me,” he said. “It seemed almost orchestrated. It’s sort of demeaning to the people of Connecticut ... I thought the senator and the vice president were both wrong to use that attack (strategy) on the voters of Connecticut.”
It's now Monday and this story is still alive in Connecticut for the fourth day. Nice going Ned.
The Lieberman camp Sunday laughed off brushed aside Lamont’s comments. “All Lieberman did was point out an important difference between his approach to national security and Ned Lamont’s, which is what campaigns are all about,” said Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein.
But it wasn't fair ...
Posted by:Steve White

#14  Grady! Get moving, the Shadow's on channel 2. They're dialing for dollars today, and I got this secret telephone.
Posted by: Fred G   2006-08-14 20:13  

#13  I'm completely convinced now that almost all Demos (with maybe the exception of Lieberman and Zell Miller) live in bizarro world. Ya know, like Saddam, who surrounded himself w/ "yes men" in an echo chamber to the point he actually believed he could beat us. Combine that with the hypocrisy of them using projection in their speeches (just like this one, accusing us of "partisanship" when he was BDS/anti-war/black facing Joe/etc.), and we (should) be seeing a nasty internal civil war in the Donks party. Unfortunately, we're not, so they'll go down in the ash heap of history soon, I'd imagine. And, while I'm ALL for the Repubs right now, long term that's NOT good for the country (no competition). I hope it'll rise third parties who'll run on a more strict-Constitutionalist platform (think Repubs' stance on foreign policy combined with Libertarian/Constitutionalist leanings domestically...like CUTTING spending, shutting down the borders, getting the Feds out of all aspects of our lives and back to the State/local level, etc.).
Posted by: BA   2006-08-14 13:14  

#12  It's almost like he wants me to lose!
Posted by: Ned Lamont   2006-08-14 13:01  

#11  We can just hope that if elected, Lieberman will be a true believer in the rule that "payback is a bitch."

Maybe he can be the first great leader of "reformed" conservative Jews in the republican party. As in, "How can a Jew be orthodox and reformed at the same time?"
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-08-14 11:53  

#10  Lamont is the poster boy for partisanship. Once again, the gall and hypocrisy of the moonbats knows no bounds.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-14 09:07  

#9  "I am shocked--shocked!--that old Rape-Gurney Joe, the Bush-kissing bloodsucker Mossad agent, would stoop to such cheap rhetoric and gutter tactics."

--Ned Lamont
Posted by: Mike   2006-08-14 08:54  

#8  did Lamont's crew do another blackface photoshop on Joe? Partisanship? Whoda thunk it
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-14 07:43  

#7  S H: LOL :)
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-14 01:26  

#6  Lamont stunned by partisanship

jeeze, how'd I get this nasty discharge?
Posted by: Streetwalkin Ho   2006-08-14 01:14  

#5  Lamont's party, the LLL, keelhauled Lieberman and basicaaly booted Lieberman out of the demo party on the basis of the war issue alone. I hope Lamont gets his butt handed to him in the elecion.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-14 01:08  

#4  "Hearth and home"?

Oh, brother.
Posted by: Elmealet Threng6841   2006-08-14 00:27  

#3  Well, the CT Democrats are engaged in a civil war of sorts right now. It'll be intersting to see what shakes out in the next month or two - any longer than that and they're in real trouble.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-08-14 00:10  

#2  Lieberman can eat this dilletante alive... if he's willing to.
Posted by: tu3031   2006-08-14 00:08  

#1  Can not take the heat get out of the kitchen. Lamont going to get his ass handed to him in Nov.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-14 00:04  

00:00