You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Original Moon Landing Film Lost
2006-08-14
The original film footage of astronaut Neil Armstrong's first steps on the moon, one of the most important artifacts of the 20th century, has been lost.

The television broadcast seen by about 600 million people in July 1969 is preserved for posterity, but the original tapes from which the footage was taken have been mislaid, most likely in NASA's vast archives at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland. The footage could transform our view of the moon landings, offering images far sharper than the blurred, grainy video shown around the world. It also could lay to rest the conspiracy theory that the landings were faked on a Hollywood soundstage.

Despite its iconic status, the television footage was the equivalent of a photocopy of a photocopy. It came from a camera that had been pointed at a black-and-white monitor on Earth. The image on the monitor, in turn, had been stripped of much of its detail. To make sure the transmission would make it back to Earth, the images sent from Apollo 11 were recorded at 10 frames per second, and had to be converted to 60 frames per second in order to be broadcast. In the process, much of the detail was lost.
Posted by:mcsegeek1

#14  Was Photoshop available in 1969?

Sure! So was MS Word. Just ask Dan Rather.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-08-14 22:52  

#13  This is what happens when you hire minimum wage high school students and work studies to do your filing.

To new work study: "Look at the file number, it goes *after* the littler numbers and *before* the bigger numbers. Can you understand that?"

It is to weep for, the amount of time I have spent looking for misplaced files.

Posted by: VA clerk   2006-08-14 22:29  

#12  Anyone so dense as to doubt the moon landings is not worth convincing anyway. It is nearly impossible to comprehend how people can be so incredibly stupid. I rate them right up there with Holocaust deniers.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-14 21:43  

#11  Get some pictures Kelly!
Posted by: 6   2006-08-14 19:28  

#10  No problem. Was biking out in Irvine this weekend and saw the old Airship hangers are still intact.

They can reshoot the landing anytime they want.
Posted by: kelly   2006-08-14 17:00  

#9  Don't worry, boys. It's in a safe place.
Posted by: mojo   2006-08-14 15:35  

#8  Was Photoshop available in 1969?
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-14 14:27  

#7  Probably was in the WTC where the U.S. Government stuffed it along with hundreds of tons of other embarassing documents (not to mention Jimmy Hoffa's body) to be destroyed on 9/11...

If you look closely at the films you can see Hoffa's left testicle foot being blown thru a window in the initial blast - just before the airliner hit.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-08-14 14:23  

#6  Conversation w/ 12 year old.,

"Did they reallty land on the moon ?"

ME: "did yoou study the space program in school ?"

"YEs"

Me : " The why did we go to the moon "?

" To beat the Russians "

Me " and who would hav had the equipment to know and been the first to cry foul had it not been true ?"

" The Russians"

ME "Did they ?"

"No"

ME "Case Closed".
Posted by: j. D. Lux   2006-08-14 13:17  

#5  When I was 16 many moons ago I believe all the govt. conspiracy crap. but when I started dealing with the govt. like SSA, Post Office, VA, hell the FBI none of these agency could keep a secret if it tried let alone hatch a conspiracy.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-14 13:06  

#4  That was scary glenmore. You do that too easily.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-14 12:50  

#3  The original was lost because there is no original. The footage broadcast was all degraded on purpose to make it harder to see that it was really filmed on a back lot in Hollywood.

See how easy it is to be a conspiracy theorist!
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-08-14 12:48  

#2  Yes they do. In fact, many of them have been digitized. Unfortunately, we're talking about the original of the first landing. You just can't calculate the historical significance, as you pointed out.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-14 12:41  

#1  That's certainly sad from a historic point of view, but as for the loss of a sharper and more detailed clip of the moon landing don't we have clips from the subsequent landings?
Posted by: Dar   2006-08-14 12:37  

00:00