You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Doubts over Belgian role in Lebanon peacekeeping mission
2006-08-17
BRUSSELS — The UN resolution over Lebanon is weaker than Belgium would have wanted, giving a convenient excuse raising doubts that Belgian troops will participate in the peacekeeping mission.
Because, you know, the Mighty Fighting BonBons do not lend their arms to just any cause!!
That's the 314th Heavy Barbershop Brigade ...
Resolution 1701 of the UN Security Council does not give the peacekeeping mission for Lebanon a mandate to restore peace because it does not refer back to Chapter VII of the UN charter.
The chapter that sez Belgian troops must never, ever, ever be put in harm's way. You could look it up.
But conscious of the 10 Belgian peacekeepers killed in Rwanda, Belgium is demanding a "clear UN mandate" as pre-condition of its participation in the Lebanon peacekeeping mission.
Mistranslation. "Mandate" does not mean "quick exit when stuff starts to fly".
"And perhaps a pony."
Foreign Minister Karel De Gucht said on Tuesday he regretted the mandate does not refer to chapter VII, newspaper 'De Standaard' reported on Wednesday. The resolution states that Israel should withdraw from Lebanon and that Hezbollah be disarmed in a 20km zone along the border. But Hezbollah is refusing to be disarmed and the Lebanese government has been proven powerless for years, so there are questions about what the peacekeeping force in consultation with the Lebanese government can actually do.
NOW they notice. Oy.
Under resolution 1701, the current Unifil peacekeeping force will be increased from 2,000 to 15,000 troops, but commander General Alain Pellegrini said on Tuesday it could be a year before all the troops are in place. Minister De Gucht, however, thinks that is unacceptable, stressing that the peacekeeping force must be in place within two months. "The coming months are critical," he said. The ceasefire that took effect on Monday morning has only been broken by Hezbollah in isolated incidents in the past two days. But behind the scenes, it appeared on Tuesday that Belgium's participation in the peacekeeping mission is in doubt. The fate of the mission rests largely in the hands of Hezbollah, which is claiming victory in the short war with Israel.
It sure as hell isn't in the hands of Euros, except insofar as they keep getting in the way to trip up the US and Israel.
Hezbollah, together with allies Iran and Syria, was again critical of Israel and the US on Tuesday.
Posted by:Seafarious

#4  
Without Belgium, who will bring the chocolates?
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-08-17 10:17  

#3  Weaker than what Belgium wanted? Is that possible?
Posted by: Jackal   2006-08-17 09:56  

#2  Certainly there will never be peace so long as the outside world insists on imposing solutions that aren't.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-17 06:37  

#1  There will never be peace in this part of the world.
Posted by: Mark Lerner   2006-08-17 06:09  

00:00