You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
'Hizbullah's arms are part of national defense'
2006-08-18
Hizbullah's arms "are part of the national defense strategy, which has yet to be discussed," Hizbullah MP Hussein Hajj Hassan said Thursday. In an interview with The Daily Star, Hajj Hassan said that there have been several proposals regarding the defense strategy and the issue of the party's weapon's, including "integrating" Hizbullah's fighters into the Lebanese Army.

As the Lebanese Army started its deployment in South Lebanese towns early Thursday, international calls became for Hizbullah to disarm picked up momentum. French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said that Hizbullah should not be keeping its arms south of the Litani River. Hajj Hassan objected to the French minister's call. "This is an internal affair which should be discussed between the Lebanese," he said. "We [Hizbullah] have decided that the issue of the resistance is a Lebanese matter that is to be discussed within the proper political frames. Whether south or north of the Litani River, this is his [Douste-Blazy's] own opinion. As for us, whatever decision the Lebanese government takes is the important thing and will be followed ... There is plenty of international pressure on Lebanon to implement such thoughts; a war was launched on Lebanon for this matter [disarming Hizbullah]."

The MP also addressed fears of a possible civil war because of Hizbullah's arms, saying: "An internal war will not occur in Lebanon. The Lebanese are more aware and too smart to be drawn by certain sides into a civil war." In response to a question on a possible rekindling of clashes between Hizbullah and Israel, Hajj Hassan said: "Israel's history is based on aggressions and wars. The last Israeli offensive was in fact a US attack on Lebanon."
Posted by:Fred

#7  IOW, IRANIAN Hizbullah consider's Lebanon a vassal government-state of Iran. THERE IS NO INTERNAL WAR becuz Iran sees SYRIA in the same way, iff only in the future, not at the fleeting present. Iranian $$$ [USD] is what supports SYRIAN HEZBOLLAH.Wid dialectical, waffle-loving GOD-BASED LEFTIES. the Great Satan remains in the lettering between HIZBULLAH vs HEZBOLLAH, etal.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-08-18 23:59  

#6  However poorly understood it may be by Muslims in general, by employing the well-known Sauce for the Gander Equation™, this would mean that Lebanese arms are a component of Hezbollah. Ergo, all of the above should be viewed as proper targets by Israel.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-18 14:58  

#5  Think its time for another Alexander to run roughshod over the region and introduce the Greek concept of 'Logic' cause its one that evades the culture.
Posted by: Threack Elmuse5948   2006-08-18 09:57  

#4  Moose-limb drivels are verbal diarhoea caused by lack of universal logic.
Posted by: Duh!   2006-08-18 08:47  

#3  Islamic "logic", as is the case with the Arab "equivalent", allows for full situational flexibility. Linear thought is completely unnatural and almost always impossible for either category. In combination, the operative word is "Tilt!".
Posted by: flyover   2006-08-18 01:43  

#2  Hizbullah's arms are part of national defense

So that means when Hezbollah attacked Israeli troops and kidnapped two of them, it represented an act of war by the nation of Lebanon against Israel. Right?
Posted by: DMFD   2006-08-18 00:07  

#1  and I thought that Chutzpah was a yiddish word, not arabic.
Posted by: RWV   2006-08-18 00:04  

00:00