You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
EU to commit 7,000 troops to Lebanon
2006-08-26
Follow-up to the story posted late yesterday.
The European Union is to mount the biggest military operation in its history after agreeing yesterday to commit more than 7,000 ground troops for a United Nations mission policing the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire.
They say they will, anyway.
The EU, at a meeting of its foreign ministers in Brussels, also agreed to send a further 2,000 specialist forces, mainly providing naval and air support.

Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, in Brussels to cajole hesitant countries, expressed his delight and said that more than half of the proposed 15,000-strong peacekeeping force was now in place. At a press conference, he said: "Europe is providing the backbone of the force." He added the force would be able to deploy "in days, not weeks".

Its willingness to commit troops demonstrates that the EU is capable of military deployments independent of the US. It also answers criticism from Washington that Europe is happy to engage in diplomacy but unwilling to put boots on the ground. As well as the 2,000 troops promised by the French president, Jacques Chirac, on Thursday, Italy committed 3,000, Spain up to 1,200, including a mechanised battalion, Belgium 400 barbers, Poland 500 and Finland 250.

Britain, Germany, Greece and Denmark offered to contribute to the 2,000 specialist forces. Britain, which was represented at the meeting by the Europe minister, Geoff Hoon, will provide six Jaguar aircraft, two AWACS reconnaissance planes and a frigate or destroyer, and offer the use of its air and naval base on Cyprus. The Irish government said it could not help out with the initial deployment but could provide help later.

The plan confirmed in Brussels is to have 4,000 troops - mainly a mixture of French and Italians - deployed in Lebanon by next week, with the others to follow by November.
So the Israelis will remain in southern Lebanon until November, right?
Two potential flashpoints with Israel immediately arose when Mr Annan made it plain that the UN force, despite Iraeli demands, would not disarm Hizbullah, saying this was a matter for the Lebanese, and would only police the Lebanon border with Syria if asked by the Lebanese government, which he said had made no such request.
And won't if they want to live.
Outside the EU, Turkey, China, Nepal, New Zealand and other countries are considering offering troops. Israel is opposed to troops pledged by Indonesia, Malaysia and Bangladesh, predominantly Muslim countries with which it has no diplomatic ties. The Israeli government argues their refusal to recognise its existence could mean troops would be biased against it, and would also make liaison impossible on issues such as sharing intelligence. But Mr Annan said yesterday he had received "firm commitments" from these countries.
I'll bet he did since they're pledging at the request of Hezbollah.
"It is vital that we deploy strong, credible and robust forces," Mr Annan said. "In today's world there is lots of competition for troops and there's no pool sitting in barracks. They can be deployed in a manner which does not produce tensions among the protogonists or which does not require contact with the Israelis."
Where are the mighty Uruguayans?
The secretary-general joined forces with Javier Solana, the EU's head of foreign and security policy, in demanding that Israel lift its blockade of Lebanese ports and Beirut airport at once to enable the peacekeeping forces to fulfil their mission and to allow the reconstruction of the country to begin and humanitarian aid to flow.
Particularly the 'aid' from Iran.
The Europeans are taking a considerable risk, with the ever-present danger of a strike by Israel or confrontation with Hizbullah, and a renewal of fighting with their forces caught in the middle. The EU's previous biggest operation was taking over from Nato in Bosnia in 2004: there is a 6,500-strong EU force in place. France and Italy, the two biggest troop contributors, appear to have resolved who will command the force. The UN troops on the ground will continue to be led by a French commander until the end of February when an Italian will take over.

In what was hailed as a breakthrough, the chain of command has been shortened so the UN troops' leadership will be answerable to an Italian general based in a special "cell" at UN headquarters in New York.
That's going to be a complete Charlie-Fox situation.
Posted by:Steve White

#11  #9 (from the article): "The weapons were detonated in a controlled manner."

Detonating them in an uncontrolled manner would have been a lot more fun. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-08-26 23:41  

#10  "The Irish government said it could not help out with the initial deployment but could provide help later."

Help in the form of "constructive criticism", as usual.
Posted by: Fordesque   2006-08-26 21:43  

#9  On the same subject.
IDF uncovers, detonates weapons cache in Lebanon
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-08-26 20:03  

#8  gromgoru, Poland is in the list, remember?
Posted by: James   2006-08-26 20:02  

#7  And then you go to the EU. Cognotive dissonance here.

That statement is redundant, Jackal.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-26 18:28  

#6  EU to commit 7,000 troops targets to Lebanon

There - fixed that for ya'.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-08-26 18:17  

#5  Hey James, they are where to protect Hizbullah "Lebanese civilians" from Israel.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-08-26 13:05  

#4  Interesting combination of countries. I'd guess that there's 100% certainty that intelligence Israel shared would get to Hez within the day. The back and forth between France and Italy the last couple of days was interesting too. What are the odds that somebody will rise to the occasion when Hisbullah brushes past the limits, if only to save face? Of course the political types back home would yank the offending officers...
Posted by: James   2006-08-26 11:48  

#3  It is vital that we deploy strong, credible and robust forces,

And then you go to the EU. Cognotive dissonance here.
Posted by: Jackal   2006-08-26 10:24  

#2  "trigger pullers"

Yes, indeed. How many of these are real trigger pullers who could put real harm on some poseur of Hezzie if need be? Or is this just the 'baggage train'?
Posted by: Omating Ebbinese4222   2006-08-26 10:12  

#1  Charlie Fox, indeed.

7,000 troops. Biggest "military" operation in EU history. To be shooting gallery bears in a completely asinine and pointless show. That "record" will probably stand longer than the EU does, too. I'll bet Texas can mobilize a larger force of National Guard troops, real trigger pullers, in 72 hours.

I once thought I knew why we were supposed to pay attention to Europe and the EU. Can't recall the reason, anymore.
Posted by: flyover   2006-08-26 04:39  

00:00