You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
EU gives Iran two weeks to clarify stance
2006-09-02
EUROPEAN Union foreign ministers agreed today to take two more weeks to try to clarify Iran's stance on halting sensitive nuclear work after Tehran ignored a UN deadline to stop uranium enrichment.

EU hapless foreign policy chief Javier Solana will meet Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, in Europe early next week to clear up ambiguities in Tehran's 21-page reply to a major power offer of cooperation if it stops work that could help build a bomb. Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel told Reuters after the 25 ministers discussed the issue at a meeting in Finland: "We give Solana two weeks for his clarification talks."
"And after that we shall give him another two weeks."
Mr Solana and other ministers insisted there was no deadline, but he said time was short and he would report to ministers at their next regular meeting on September 15. He said he would be talking with Larijani also on behalf of the six powers which agreed on the package of economic, technological and political incentives - the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany. An EU official said there could be consultations among United Nations Security Council members before then but the Council would not formally take up the matter.

Asked when he now expected Tehran to comply with the UN resolution, Mr Solana said: "Yesterday."
Snort. Snicker. You and what army, Javier?
EU diplomats said ministers wanted to take a bit more time not so much because they believed Tehran would have a change of heart but more to show public opinion and sceptical Security Council powers Russia and China they had explored every avenue. "After what happened on Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, we really have to convince people that we have gone the extra mile," one said.
Neville thought the same thing.
Ministers declined to talk publicly about what sanctions they might apply if Tehran did not comply. However, British Europe Minister Geoff Hoon said Iran had had plenty of time to respond to what he called the perfectly reasonable request and he had called for "robust action". "Despite our intensive efforts of the last six months, there has up to today unfortunately been no signal of reciprocity from Iran," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told reporters.

But he added: "We in the EU and Germany have no interest in an escalation in the coming days and weeks due to deliberations in the Security Council."

French Europe Minister Catherine Colonna said it was important to continue the dialogue with Tehran while reminding Iran of the international community's conditions. Asked how long Iran had to comply with the Security Council's demands on its nuclear program, she said: "Rendezvous in a few days."
Posted by:Oztralian

#11  Anyone read Tom Clancy's book "Clear & Present Danger"? They had this really nifty stealth bomb that they dropped on a truck to make the bad guys think that someone had car boomed them.

Given the MidEast propensity for such tactics wouldn't it be neat to have a B2 drop a stealth bomb on the MMs? Gee, what was that? Looks like some opporsition group hit 'em wit a car bomb. Too bad, dudes.

What us???????? Says who???????
Posted by: AlanC   2006-09-02 20:16  

#10  that would be a short campaign. They export oil and natural gas, and import refined gasoline. = they are short on refinery capacity, even shorter should consequences hostilities break out
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-02 16:59  

#9  I vote we destroy an Iranian oil refinery every day until they agree to our demands.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-09-02 16:02  

#8  This is like giving yet another two weeks notice to a bunch of squatters who are kicking holes in the walls and using the furniture for firewood.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-02 15:47  

#7  I vote for robust action.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-09-02 13:27  

#6  Check, Czech.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-09-02 13:05  

#5   Czech Foreign Minister Cyril Svoboda said a coalition might have to impose sanctions unilaterally if the United Nations was unable to agree on punitive measures.

"It will be very, very difficult, but ... please, we need to stick together with the United States," he told reporters.
Posted by: twobyfour   2006-09-02 13:03  

#4  Can't take 'no' for an answer because they have no other solution.

We need to stop protecting the Euros with missile defense and such.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-09-02 11:03  

#3  They don't need two weeks for an answer. They got it. They're just in convulsions cause their heads are about to explode over whether they fear Iran more than they despise Bush. It's like that scene near the end in the original Star Trek episode with the Nomad probe.
Posted by: Shinenter Angomoque2229   2006-09-02 09:19  

#2  2 Weeks, huh? And after that, whatcha gonna do EU?

"Ambiguities", LOL. Okay, I guess there are quite a few EUphemisms for "FUCK YOU".

Boy, I'm sure they'll get really extra tough after they piss away 2 more weeks. What's it add up to now - 3 years?

Then, when the Russkies and ChiDinks veto any UNSC action, they'll wring their hands and say, "Well, we tried. Let's talk some more, add some more carrots, try to torpedo whatever the US is doing. Yeah, that's the ticket!"
Posted by: flyover   2006-09-02 09:14  

#1  :> 2 Weeks?
We shall now dance the Mayonnaise!
Posted by: 6   2006-09-02 09:07  

00:00