You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
NATO Wants More Troops to Fight Taliban
2006-09-08
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - NATO's top military commander said Thursday that he needs more troops to fight the Taliban terrorists in southern Afghanistan, where a widening insurgency has left hundreds of Taliban terrorists dead, including 21 terrorists militants in the alliance's latest air and ground attacks.

U.S. Gen. James L. Jones acknowledged NATO had been surprised by the "level of intensity" of Taliban attacks since the alliance took over from American-led coalition forces in the south in August.

NATO officials say current troop levels are enough to combat terrorists militants in southern deserts and mountain ranges, or crossing from neighboring Pakistan. But the vast battlefield in the south provides ample cover for terrorists insurgents familiar with the terrain and the region's tribes. Additional air support and as many as 2,500 new, highly mobile reserve troops would help finish the conflict faster, the officials said.

Jones, speaking in Belgium after a visit to Afghanistan, said NATO needed "additional insurance in terms of some forces that can be there, perhaps temporarily, to make sure that we can carry the moment." That could take the form of helicopters, transport planes and "flexible" reserve troops able to move quickly to support NATO forces battling militants.

Jones later told reporters at the Pentagon by telephone that he was seeking roughly 2,000 to 2,500 extra NATO troops for the south. He said they would bring the NATO contribution up to 100 percent - up from 85 percent - of the force level pledged by allied governments before the southern deployment. There are now about 20,000 NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Jones said he was confident that generals from the 26 NATO nations, meeting Friday and Saturday in Warsaw, Poland, would authorize the reinforcements. "In the relatively near future, certainly before the winter, we will see this decisive moment in the region turn in favor of the troops that represent the government," he said. "It will help us to reduce casualties and bring this to a successful conclusion in a short period of time."
Posted by:Steve White

#3  Stingy buggers, these NATO countries on defense. Now perhaps the appearance of materiel and manpower lackings may send themselves a message. All those years of depending on Uncle Sam's umbrella.
Posted by: Duh!   2006-09-08 16:31  

#2  The terrers had the American's number and it was something they didn't want to come up against anytime soon. However, all that whiny and handwringing that's been coming out of Eurasia about the WOT, they thought you boys would be an easier push over. So they came out to play. The NATO crowd saw the American performance, and clean up on aisle 3, and thought 1) the heavy job had already been done and 2) if the Yanks could do it so easily, so could they. Surprise. Maybe we'll hear a lot less talk, though I doubt it, by some [pick your favorite nationality] general criticing American military performance in the future.
Posted by: Unomotch Flemble7560   2006-09-08 10:16  

#1  Get the extra troops in there while the bad guy is still in front of you. Or you can get them in there later and deal with them when they're behind you, too.
Posted by: gorb   2006-09-08 01:07  

00:00