| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| VA Sex Offender Sues to Keep name Off of Web |
| 2006-09-11 |
| Posted by:lotp |
| #8 Dar, I hate to say it, but I'm sure some of the "parents" were thinking that way. Sick, ain't it? |
| Posted by: Swamp Blondie 2006-09-11 13:51 |
| #7 SB--Respectfully, I don't believe those parents actually trusted MJ, but rather they were using their children as sacrificial bait to enrich themselves. Something along the lines of "Little Timmy is now scarred for life, but I think $5 million will make us--I mean 'him'--cope with the nightmares a little easier." |
| Posted by: Dar 2006-09-11 13:16 |
| #6 Oh, well incest. Thats every bit as bad as child molesting. That sick fuck should be put on the front cover of the local paper. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2006-09-11 13:09 |
| #5 A lot of stupid people still trusted Michael Jackson with their kids after the first round of accusations. So what? Not impressed by the family's actions in the slightest, and disgustingly typical of families where incest has occurred. If some guy who got convicted of statutory rape because of consensual activity with a 17 year old girlfriend when he was 18 is on the list, why the hell shouldn't he be? |
| Posted by: Swamp Blondie 2006-09-11 13:06 |
| #4 Well, according to Jesus, that would have been better. |
| Posted by: mcsegeek1 2006-09-11 12:42 |
| #3 Millstone . . . creep . . . short length of rope . . . large body of water. |
| Posted by: Mike 2006-09-11 11:58 |
| #2 She described him as an "excellent uncle" to her children, |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2006-09-11 11:04 |
| #1 Public conviction, public record. |
| Posted by: Thaitle Phiter8656 2006-09-11 10:17 |