You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Jimmah Carter Says He Hopes Lieberman Loses
2006-09-14
Democrat Ned Lamont said Wednesday the U.S. is weaker because of the war in Iraq backed by rival Sen. Joe Lieberman, and he called for shifting forces to Afghanistan and elsewhere.

"We have sacrificed our daughters and sons and our treasure in a war we didn't have to fight," Lamont said. "We have ignored the real threats and security needs in the war we should be fighting, the one against the terrorists. ... Senator Lieberman believes that President Bush has it right in Iraq. I believe that he's dangerously wrong."

The Democrat, who upset the three-term Lieberman last month in Connecticut's Democratic primary, spoke at Yale Law School — Lieberman's alma mater. Lamont received a degree from Yale School of Management. After the defeat, Lieberman embarked on an independent bid in hopes of holding onto his seat.

Lamont's campaign got a boost Wednesday from former President Carter, who offered a blistering critique of Lieberman's support for the Iraq war. "He was one of the originators of public statements that misled the American people into believing that the Iraqi war was justified," the former Democratic president said on CNN's "Larry King Live."

"He's joined in with the Republican spokespersons by saying that Democrats who disagree are really supporting terrorism," Carter said. "So for all these reasons, I've lost my confidence in Joe Lieberman and don't wish to see him re-elected."

Lamont, a multimillionaire businessman who spent about $4 million of his own money in the primary, is tapping his personal fortune once again. He has written checks totaling $1.5 million for his general election bid, his campaign confirmed Wednesday. Lamont gave his campaign $1 million on Sept. 11. He wrote a $500,000 check on Aug. 22.

Lamont's anti-war stance propelled his candidacy and the November election is seen as a referendum on President Bush's policies and the war. Lieberman is a staunch supporter of the war.

"Today we have five times as many troops in Iraq as we have in Afghanistan," he said. "We spend more in a month in Iraq than we do in a year in Afghanistan. These decisions are wrong and they have left us less safe."

Lieberman campaign spokeswoman Tammy Sun called the speech "partisan, slashing rhetoric."

"There were no new constructive ideas and certainly nothing to assure voters that he understands the threats we face not just in Iraq, but around the world, and that he will do what's right to keep America safe," she said.

The two candidates continue to trade accusations over the war. Lamont recently contended Lieberman has missed 31 of 61 votes on Iraq since the invasion in 2003. Lieberman says he has a nearly 95 percent voting record.

"It is the job of Congress to provide the necessary checks and balances, to work with the president when he's right, but to hold him to account when he's wrong," Lamont said. "President Bush rushed us into this war based on trumped-up intelligence, and Senator Lieberman cheered him on every step of the way. President Bush failed in the execution of this war, and Senator Lieberman failed to hold him to account."
Posted by:mcsegeek1

#10  #8: "I just wonder, Jimmy's getting worse and worse, Senility setting in perhaps?"

Nah, Jim, he's just a dictator-loving pathetic pussie - has been for decades.

If/when senility sets in on him, no one will be able to tell.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-09-14 22:55  

#9  Redneck Jim - I think it set in thirty-some years ago.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-09-14 21:59  

#8  I just wonder, Jimmy's getting worse and worse, Senility setting in perhaps?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-09-14 19:13  

#7  You know the feeling, huh, Jimmy. Still can't get over how the voters turned you and your sweater out of office. It wasn't anything personal Hmmm, yes it was and you still can't take the hint.
Posted by: Glairt Unealing5386   2006-09-14 18:45  

#6  I take a look at jimmays current picture and wonder HOW that bag of flesh is being helf together. I know it's wrong to wish death on a ex-president but still, somebody take a stapler to this guys mouth.
Posted by: Charles   2006-09-14 16:56  

#5  Evil thugs and dictators LOVE Jimmy Carter. Nuff said.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-09-14 16:39  

#4  Jimmah should have stuck to Habitat for Humanity to fill out his final days. His failed presidency may have been lessened by doing good deeds. Folks may have thought he had some redeemable qualities even though he was a failed leader. But noooooo....got to stick his peanut brain into things and prove he is a nut-less "Jimmah the Dimmah". Now we cast a jaundiced eye to his time in the White House and people see the current tribulations with the Islamic d...heads leads right back to his failed policies with the hostages in 1979. No favorable legacy for you, young man...
Posted by: Warthog   2006-09-14 16:24  

#3  Maybe Jimmy and Lamont are secret lovers, with Fidel providing a weird triangle thing and Chavez looking on jealously from the sidelines?
Posted by: Iblis   2006-09-14 16:15  

#2  Lamont's campaign got a boost Wednesday from former President Carter

I doubt there was a boost.
Posted by: DoDo   2006-09-14 16:12  

#1  Jimmah is becoming the willing attack dog for the Dummocrats. He's willing to go anywhere to put his face in front of the cameras. I guess he realizes, as his days wind down, that his reputation places him near the bottom of the pile for failed presidencies. But,like Murtha, he is nothing but a buffoon. He is really showing what a nitwit he was/is.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-09-14 15:46  

00:00