| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| WND : Al-Qaida warning: Muslims leave U.S. |
| 2006-09-17 |
| Afghan terror commander hints at big attack on N.Y., Washington See link. |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #45 "Can breach America security again...We can attack America at any time [they choose]". > you hoo, Dubya-GOP, can we have a draft now. THE TRAITOR-CRATS, WAFFLE-CRATS, DEFEAT-CRATS, BLAME-CRATS, MOTHER-CRATS + COMMIE-CRATS, ETAL. PROMISE TO CRY AT YOUR FUNERALS AFTER THEY KILL YOU + FREE AMERICA + WESTERN/GLOBAL DEMOCRACY. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2006-09-17 23:43 |
| #44 Well , here we are back in 600 ad The battle is actually ideologicall based on the illegitamate father of the arabs Ishmael [ Abraham's son of convenience who was prophesised by God to be a wild ass of a man] and Isaac[ Abraham's son of the promise whos son Israel is the father of the 12 tribes of Israel who inhereted the promised land Israel] -- so , are we surprised? The heart of the matter is Jesus, the saviour of the world and a resurrected jew ... and the Only way to Heaven Now doesnt that get a lot of Muslim people pissed |
| Posted by: Same as last time 2006-09-17 23:05 |
| #43 "#14 Can they wait until after I'm recovered from surgery? I'm not as good a shot left-handed." I also have problems with my right shoulder. I'd better hurry up and get some practice shooting with my left arm. How much time do I have? |
| Posted by: TMH 2006-09-17 23:03 |
| #42 43: Note that none of the Arabs who mounted the 9/11 operation were here using Saudi government money, either for their stay here or their flight training. The actual terror funding - although original sources are not fully established - came through the UAE. Interestingly, an opportunity to kill bin Laden was missed, because a UAE holy family member was seen with him on a falcoln hunting trip to Afghanistan. Bill Clinton was President at the time. As for Saudi money, most Saudi students come to the US on government scholarships. They are screened, not that they don't bring Wahabi indoctrination with them. |
| Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550 2006-09-17 20:53 |
| #41 AP: The basic story is this: The Saudis are giving full scholarships to 15K students (I doubt for any wimmen). What TABD has missed is the fact that Uncle Sam admits foreign students based on ability to pay. And the Saudi students who are being sent here don't have a problem with paying since the Saudi government is footing the bill. Note that none of the Arabs who mounted the 9/11 operation were here using Saudi government money, either for their stay here or their flight training. |
| Posted by: Zhang Fei 2006-09-17 20:25 |
| #40 AP, they "want" the money. Whether they "need" it, is anuther question altogether. |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2006-09-17 18:36 |
| #39 Well, aside from all the fly specks, I did see a headline last week in the MSM about 15K so-called Saudi students being allowed to come here. What are the details? This is setting off alarms in me head---big time. OK, HERE is a linky through See-BS News™. The basic story is this: The Saudis are giving full scholarships to 15K students (I doubt for any wimmen). Colleges and universities are competing fiercely like 'hos in a street corner for the |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2006-09-17 17:48 |
| #38 I'm glad that your questions are answered. |
| Posted by: tired and beat down 2006-09-17 17:45 |
| #37 Calm down, tabd. I wasn't referring to you. Our dispute has already been settled by the moderator, thank you very much. Enough of this already. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 17:40 |
| #36 spittle flecked? Drive by? My point stands without a name. Bush allowed 15,000 Arab students in the US as exchange students. This is tantamount to an army. Do you need my name to dispute this? Besides, since when are you a fan of Bush? |
| Posted by: tired and beat down 2006-09-17 17:35 |
| #35 Oooooh, a series of spittle flecked drive-by posts. Another sure sign of towering intellects at work. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 17:19 |
| #34 ok fair enough. This is my name and I'm sticking to it until I am banned. Nevertheless, my point remains valid. Thoughts don't need names to be valid. |
| Posted by: tired and beat down 2006-09-17 16:57 |
| #33 To the nym-less poster: I'm one of the moderators on duty. Pick a nym and stick to it. We know your IP anyways so you might as well. Also remember that the Burg is about 'civil and well-reasoned' discourse. Civility is a key part of that. Act like a troll and two things will happen: 1) the regulars will use you as a chew-toy and 2) I'll ban you. Hope that's clear. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2006-09-17 16:47 |
| #32 all hail the mighty Zen |
| Posted by: Legolas 2006-09-17 16:37 |
| #31 bushitler bushitler bushilter |
| Posted by: Legolas 2006-09-17 16:37 |
| #30 its all bush's fault |
| Posted by: Legolas 2006-09-17 16:37 |
| #29 yeah it was the Bush admin that shot down anwar hahahahahahaha |
| Posted by: Legolas 2006-09-17 16:36 |
| #28 Here's some news, # 27. Anonymous baiting doesn't work on me. Get a 'nym, post regularly and get back to me then, emkay? |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 16:33 |
| #27 And please do not cite opening up ANWR as any sort of realistic effort. Its entire oil supply is a hiccup in comparison to our nation's energy requirements. The production off of Louisiana is a similarly "small" amount of our requirements, of about 5-10% per annum. And when it got torn up by Katrina and Rita, prices went up a lot more than the inverse of the contraction in supply. Incremental steps matter. Blocking of incremental steps matters more, because it adds a "politics" risk premium to any private-sector investment in energy development, renewable or otherwise. (Which is why the litigation around those wind farms off of Long Island hurt so much, even if the wind farm itself isn't that large; it's the legal classes' way of saying "Nice portfolio you have there. Be a shame if something happened to it." |
| Posted by: Phil 2006-09-17 16:16 |
| #26 Thank you Abu-Hatem il-Yerbouti Concentrate all the assholes in one place for easier disposal. |
| Posted by: Redneck Jim 2006-09-17 16:11 |
| #25 "Intelligent development of domestic energy resources" wasn't derailed by Halliburton, Bush, or Cheney. Exactly where have I ever said that it was? Purchase a clue, all right? My comments intend to point out a remarkable degree of disinterest by this administration in unhooking us from Arab oil and the immense potential for conflict of interest. While over-emphasis of ecological concerns is clearly strangling much of this nation's attempts to develop realistic alternative energy (i.e., not solar, wind or geothermal), it is incumbent upon the administration to show leadership towards this and they have not. And please do not cite opening up ANWR as any sort of realistic effort. Its entire oil supply is a hiccup in comparison to our nation's energy requirements. We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 16:01 |
| #24 O Muslims! Pack your bags and leave infidel America and its scantily clad women, allowance of only 1 wife to a Muslim man, and lack of prayer facilities at workplaces. And American authorities even question our attacks on Christians and Jews. You saw what short-range missiles did to Israeli civilians. Make haste to your homeland, and prepare to build ICBMs for use against America. |
| Posted by: Abu-Hatem il-Yerbouti 2006-09-17 15:49 |
| #23 Borders, language and culture. Michael Savage had it right. This is the only mantra which will save this country. Secure the borders first. |
| Posted by: Art 2006-09-17 15:37 |
| #22 As I pointed out earlier today, the zealots all wiped out each other; the Romans just went on to mop up the remainder before enslaving the civilians. Blathering on about how you think the People's Front of Judaea made too much money in their youth in oil and is therefore helping the Romans... is helping the Romans. |
| Posted by: Phil 2006-09-17 15:35 |
| #21 "Intelligent development of domestic energy resources" wasn't derailed by Halliburton, Bush, or Cheney. It was derailed in the House and Senate, with virtually all of the Democratic officeholders joined by some 15-20% of the Republicans. And it's been going on like this for a long while. And your statements are very close to the same bloody-minded excuse those cretins give when when they derail said "intelligent development of domestic energy resources." |
| Posted by: Phil 2006-09-17 15:33 |
| #20 Give it a rest, Phil. I'm all for intelligent development of domestic energy resources, especially responsibly operated nuclear power. The current administration has done jack-all to get us off of the oil teat and I find their rather substantial ties with big oil to be a definite conflict of interest. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 15:27 |
| #19 Is Pakistan a member of the IAEA group? A quick search did not reveal much. If they are, we would have isotopic "fingerprints" of their fissile materials and could backtrack fallout from a terrorist nuclear attack that used a device supplied by them. This is what makes Iran's unauthorize enrichment program so dangerous. We have no exact way to trace fissile material directly back to them. Once again, Mrs. Davis's solution springs to mind. Simply notify each and every single one of the rogue regimes and Islamic majority nations that a single terrorist nuclear attack on American soil gets all of them glassed and Windexed™. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 15:22 |
| #18 I am an oil rich robber barron, ahhhh moneyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!! |
| Posted by: Legolas 2006-09-17 15:20 |
| #17 With an administration that relies upon the petroleum industry as a chief source of their personal wealth, don't count on this happening anytime soon. Funny you should say that; it's the same excuse the Dems give every time they vote to continue limiting drilling on the North Slope, or off of some 85% of the seaboard of this country... they talk about how they're "striking back" against the oil cartels, and as a result they just import more from hostile foreign governments instead. Ask not who the useful idiots are. The useful idiot is you. |
| Posted by: Phil 2006-09-17 15:17 |
| #16 These guys do not have the capability to detonate a real nuke. Enabling a triggering mechanism is beyond the physics, and engineering capability of a renegade group doing this in secret. The ISI is virtually the Siamese twin of dozens of jihadi groups. While it may not be possible for al'Qaeda to make its own bomb, it's entirely possible that Pakistan would loan one out. |
| Posted by: Rob Crawford 2006-09-17 15:05 |
| #15 It is about time the Bush Administration pulls out some plan to dump oil and move our economy over to nuclear and other non-Islamic cash generating means. With an administration that relies upon the petroleum industry as a chief source of their personal wealth, don't count on this happening anytime soon. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 14:32 |
| #14 Can they wait until after I'm recovered from surgery? I'm not as good a shot left-handed. |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2006-09-17 14:31 |
| #13 What AQ is likely to be planning is to boom 4 radiological bombs with 134Cs and/or 137Cs. It has a long half-life and it is a pain to clean it up. It may be easier obtainable than U isotopes as it is used in medical research and a right bribe in a right country may just be the way to get it despite a tight control. (There has been a shipment of Cesium going from UK through Bulgaria to Iran MoD, and Bulgarian Customs halted it. But who knows how many shipments went through previously, or through different routes.) The likely locations are at exit routes from 4 major cities, to disrupt the economy and create panic. The likely bomb setting would be a tractor trailer or similar, left at the proximity of the city exit route. The candidate cities are LA, Seattle/Portland and on the East Coast New York and Washington, but instead of Washington, Chicago or Atlanta may be on the list. This information has been gleaned by someone who frequents jihadi forums to collect intel. Unfortunately, no specificic date has been given, but based on the article, it may be within 6 months, if not several weeks. |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2006-09-17 14:21 |
| #12 It's sad, but I believe it will take just such an attack...and maybe several, before America wakes up to the threat in our midst and finally calls this war what it is: a clash of civilizations between Islam and everyone else. |
| Posted by: mcsegeek1 2006-09-17 14:21 |
| #11 These guys do not have the capability to detonate a real nuke. Enabling a triggering mechanism is beyond the physics, and engineering capability of a renegade group doing this in secret. It could be a dirty bomb...but even that would have a limited kill radius. More likley it could be a bio-attack. Just my opinion. However, if it does occur, I guarantee that the immigration issue and the border fence is a done deal. There would be a mass deportation of 100s of 1000s of illegals of all stripes and nationalities. Then we would eliminate terrorist enclaves in Pakistan and Syria...and maybe even confront iran. |
| Posted by: anymouse 2006-09-17 14:18 |
| #10 It is about time the Bush Administration pulls out some plan to dump oil and move our economy over to nuclear and other non-Islamic cash generating means. That way no matter what kind of tool takes over the White House in 2008 it won't be too bad. Oh, and its about time for someone to stand up and ask the question: Islam: Must it be destroyed totally? I'd love to see the seething and ranting but I'm sure a germ of fear would start to spread amung the psychos about how close they really are to total destruction if the west decides we've finally had enough and that we can't live beside them in peace. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2006-09-17 13:57 |
| #9 There was someone here the other night claiming to have seen this very individual in the D.C. environs, and very troubled by it. |
| Posted by: J.D. Lux 2006-09-17 13:28 |
| #8 Abu Dawood told Hamid Mir, a reporter who has covered al-Qaida and met with Osama bin Laden, the attack is being coordinated by Adnan el-Shukrijumah and suggests it may involve some form of weapon of mass destruction smuggled across the Mexican border. And how quickly afterward would Iran be flattened, the border fence completed, and Muslims affiliated with know radical mosques and illegal aliens shipped back home? Such intelligent people. |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2006-09-17 13:25 |
| #7 2 birds, 1 stone. bye, bye -and plotters dead. |
| Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412 2006-09-17 13:21 |
| #6 Does anyone really doubt any longer that Islam will continue to push their flimsy luck until we glass and Windex™ their pathetic asses? I am past sick and tired of living with Islam's constant threats. Just for the peace of mind I am almost willing to say, "launch and get it over with". |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-09-17 13:20 |
| #5 Bush should make it publicly clear that if this happens all Islamic countries disappear from the face of the earth. In addition he should demand that ISLAM TURN OVER OSAMA AND ALL THE TOP FRUITCAKES - YESTERDAY! |
| Posted by: 3dc 2006-09-17 13:19 |
| #4 Man, I hope they catch that Shukrijumah guy. |
| Posted by: J.D. Lux 2006-09-17 13:11 |
| #3 Hit the Emirate of Waziristan hard now with premptive Arc Light attacks on mosques and population centers |
| Posted by: 3dc 2006-09-17 13:09 |
| #2 LOL. Damn Rove is good! |
| Posted by: flyover 2006-09-17 12:50 |
| #1 buy em a ticket out as long as they renounce citizenship and NO returning |
| Posted by: Frank G 2006-09-17 12:44 |