You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Bush Sends Iran Strong but Wrong Message
2006-09-19


Bush bypasses Iranian leaders to tell the people: We respect you

[entire article at link]

Mr Bush pledged that Washington would accept Iran developing civilian nuclear power but delivered an uncompromising message that it must abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions.

While Bush may be trying to throw Iran's people a face-saving sop in the form of continued pursuit of nuclear power generation, this is the exact wrong message to give a terrorist regime.

Nuclear power generation, as it iscurrently configured, is essentially a "dual use" technology. Any country that can master the entire fuel cycle then has direct access to the processing of weapons grade fissile material. Any nation that is at all involved in terrorism must denied nuclear technology of any sort. The ability to responsibly operate atomic power generation is an enticing carrot that must be withheld from those who refuse to comply with the bare minimums of orderly global conduct.

To date, Iran has done exactly ZERO to fulfill its obligations as a player on the world's stage. Much to the contrary, Iran has made nuclear threats against Israel and America, continued to sponsor international terrorism and meddle in the recovery of Iraq at the cost of American military lives. Until alternative reactor designs, like pebble bed technology or thorium fuel cycles are in mature operation, no Islamic regime should have access to the complete nuclear fuel cycle.
Posted by:Zenster

#11  Thank you for your support, J.D. Lux. Not many others might agree with you so readily, but I really appreciate the kind word. The level of intellectual honesty here at Rantburg forces me to drill down a lot farther then I have had to in the past. I believe that I'm up to the task and I thank Fred Pruitt and all the moderators here for the opportunity to hone my personal philosophy and learn so much in the course of doing it.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-19 23:54  

#10  Thank you and back on you Zen.
Dude doncha know I'm yer biggest fan ?
Can't just write "yup" all the time tho'.
Posted by: J. D. Lux   2006-09-19 22:20  

#9  I'm here to get away from that crap.

Me, too, J.D. Lux. Welcome to Rantburg.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-19 22:14  

#8  "Good stuff. I'm really, really glad to see that no one is trying to trot out the, "but Iran's a signatory of the NPT and that gives them the right to peaceful nuclear power", crap."

I'm here to get away from that crap.
ImmadandIneedajihad sure said it though, and I'm sure there
are lots of buyers.
I do believe that Iran is the only country with a "fountain of blood" as a war memorial.
Posted by: J. D. Lux   2006-09-19 22:06  

#7  Good stuff. I'm really, really glad to see that no one is trying to trot out the, "but Iran's a signatory of the NPT and that gives them the right to peaceful nuclear power", crap.

Iran deserves exactly, SQUAT.

They are quite possibly the single most violent terrorist regime on earth. Only North Korea's mistreatment of its own population holds a candle to this bunch of retarded psycho loons. Incidentally, I did not see Bush's speech at the UN but merely snagged on the one paragraph above while reading about it.

Nuclear power of any sort must denied all nations who participate in or sponsor terrorism. If they try to acquire it, we need to bomb their efforts back to square one, just as I hope we will do with Iran.

Iran is the posterchild for what to expect if this is not implemented as general policy.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-19 21:57  

#6  Pinch just whipped out his "Chocolate The Moose" beanie babie. "Gee, guys", he whines, "Just how in the hell do we grovel to this nut?"
Posted by: mrp   2006-09-19 20:55  

#5  plus the NY phonebook the runt had to stand on....
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-19 20:44  

#4  No halo. At leat not for me...
Lots about sharia (interpreted as "justice").
Lot's about bad bad Israel and hegemonc USA.
Big finish about the coming "savior" and the perfection of man through "monotheism" and "Justice" (sharia) for all.
Posted by: J. D. Lux   2006-09-19 20:42  

#3  Bush's speech was pretty weak. I suspect he had something much stronger prepared but when Chiraq backed out on sanctions, there was not enough time to put something else together.

Was there a halo around dinnerjacket?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-09-19 20:36  

#2  I just saw Ahmadinejad's address.
Diabolical.
Big religious tirade at the end.
Diafuckinbolical.
Posted by: J. D. Lux   2006-09-19 20:29  

#1  Good comments, Zen. It behooves to remember at this juncture that our beloved (cough, cough) President Carter nixed our breeder reactor program because of plutonium proliferation concerns. If we can't even trust ourselves with this stuff, we surely can't trust them.

By the by, for those not familiar with commercial nuclear reactors, towards the end of the core life plutonium accounts for a significant portion of the fissions taking place. Thus, anyone running a commercial reactor can remove the fuel bundles, run them through the PUREX process, and voila! plutonium.
Posted by: Dreadnought   2006-09-19 19:37  

00:00