You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Operation Medusa
2006-09-23
In the war on terror, few battles are as clear and decisive as the one fought these last few weeks in southern Afghanistan. Six thousand Canadian, British, American and other NATO troops trounced resurgent Taliban fighters who dared to fight in the open. "Operation Medusa" dislodged insurgents from trenches and tunnels near Kandahar, killing a thousand or more.

The intensity of the fighting surprised some NATO allies, who this summer took over the lead in southern Afghanistan from the U.S. More tests are to come. The insurgents will surely regroup, shun direct engagements with Western troops and resort to the ad hoc terrorism perfected in Iraq. To adapt NATO's nomenclature, the Medusa was injured but the snakes are very much alive.

The battle in the south is not a sign, as some would have it, that Afghanistan has been lost. With U.S. forces tracking al Qaeda along the border with Pakistan and the Kabul government slow to assert itself, a security and political vacuum emerged in that region. In stepped drug lords, former Taliban fighters and tribal chiefs who have little in common except a large stake in continued instability.

Narcotics money and lax Pakistani border control let the Taliban rearm and recruit new fighters. Some schools for girls, a great achievement in post-Taliban Afghanistan, were forced to close. Local chiefs backed the Taliban, while a population who had high expectations for the future turned against Kabul and the West.
Posted by:Captain America

#19  My apologies, 6. I'd always been told the capitol of Kentucky is spelt Frankfort with an o, and I'm not aware of any other communities there using the German spelling, which no doubt reflects my poor geographical knowledge.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-09-23 18:40  

#18  Frankfurt Kentucky TW, used to be the location of the big federal hospital for addicts.
Posted by: 6   2006-09-23 18:32  

#17  To the best of my knowledge, 49Pan is now stateside, 6. He mucking about The Philippines for a bit before that, perhaps that trip went out from Germany?
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-09-23 18:13  

#16  Reason I mentioned 49P is because of his location in Frankfurt, used to be/still? A large Fed hospital for them with wanting troubles.
Posted by: 6   2006-09-23 17:28  

#15  damn. Wait...there's a knock at the door, BRB....
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-23 16:39  

#14  No. When it was done with me I was done with it I sent the two resulting pods on to you and ship.
Posted by: Phil   2006-09-23 16:36  

#13  granted. Did you check under your bed for a JM-produced pod?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-23 16:31  

#12  I don't know what else to call 'em, Frank, it's such a good descriptive word.
Posted by: Phil   2006-09-23 16:30  

#11  Well, I don't know ANY heroin addicts or even viable suspects. Does anyone else here? It's a Euro and ghetto/barrio issue with a minor anglo component. Less damaging or pervasive in America than the Coke/meth issue.
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-23 16:30  

#10  The other part is that the percentage that can be classified as addicts is indeed relatively small. They are either then a local problem, or not a direct impact/strain on medical resources.

A small and predictable number, I sense that maybe 49 Pan may have insight here.
Posted by: 6   2006-09-23 16:23  

#9  What I don't get is why politicians have no problem alienating smokers, who are a huge segment of the population, but have real qualms about alienating drug users, who can't possibly be over a few per cent of the population.

There's no widespread pressure to do so. Part of it is cultural; we can thank the Boomers for that. I suspect (ironically) that there more than a few anti-tobacco folk out there that aren't adverse to toking up.

The other part is that the percentage that can be classified as addicts is indeed relatively small. They are either then a local problem, or not a direct impact/strain on medical resources.

If it got to the level of alcohol abuse or smoking, then you might see pressure.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-09-23 14:54  

#8  BettyCrockerCrats? uh oh...JM's influence is spreading. The quarantine is compromised
Posted by: Frank G   2006-09-23 14:37  

#7  What I don't get is why politicians have no problem alienating smokers, who are a huge segment of the population, but have real qualms about alienating drug users, who can't possibly be over a few per cent of the population.

Oh, I have an answer to that, Zhang Fei.

Marx said that religion is the opiate of the masses.

Since today's BettyCrockerCrats don't like religion, they need to have real opiates there to keep the troublesome people pacified.

Nicotine, AFAIK, isn't an opiate but just another mild stimulant, albeit addictive.

It doesn't do any good from the pacification point of view, and who knows? Maybe some of the people who quit will wind up on real pacification drugs like marijuana, which would represent a net gain for the BCC's.
Posted by: Phil   2006-09-23 12:54  

#6  glenmore: Summary execution of heroin users for treasonous conduct might be effective, but somehow I doubt it would be acceptable.

I don't think we need to go that far. Singapore executes drug traffickers - defined as being in possession of anything over half a pound of most illegal drugs. Let me tell you that drugs aren't as readily available there as they are anywhere stateside. Executing dealers - after due process - would probably be somewhat more popular than executing users. Although there is a motivated subculture of non-addict recreational users who would probably scream at the thought of their supply being cut off. What I don't get is why politicians have no problem alienating smokers, who are a huge segment of the population, but have real qualms about alienating drug users, who can't possibly be over a few per cent of the population.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-09-23 12:00  

#5  Phil, very good point. Consumption, not merely supply, is what needs to be curtailed. Unfortunately, the liberal Western countries would rather point the figure at producer countries instead.

The net result is that consumption leads to more fortified terrorists who kill the valient soldiers from these same countries. The best citizens get killed while the consuming citizens indirectly contribute to their deaths.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-09-23 10:49  

#4  "Ergo the drug problem is not solvable in Afghanistan."

Summary execution of heroin users for treasonous conduct might be effective, but somehow I doubt it would be acceptable. My suggestion is for the government to buy up the supply direct from the growers and give it away free to the junkies, but that's not acceptable either.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-09-23 09:44  

#3  One observation on Afghanistan and drugs. Any economist worth his salt will tell you that the way to increase trade is to increase supply, and the way the decrease trade is to decrease demand. Ergo the drug problem is not solvable in Afghanistan.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-09-23 08:19  

#2  Free link
Posted by: Captain America   2006-09-23 08:09  

#1  Link
Posted by: Captain America   2006-09-23 08:08  

00:00