| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Clinton Doth Protest Too Much |
| 2006-09-26 |
| Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC |
| #12 Nimble- Greatest Generation, Don't foget about two term President Ike, he led them to victory in Europe. |
| Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC 2006-09-26 20:24 |
| #11 Gotta agree with Nimble here. Clinton won the first time because of the Perot factor, and the second time because of an uninspired Dole campaign and numerous independent factions. He never garnered close to a majority of the vote. Knowing what we know now about him (I knew before he was President because I worked at the Little Rock Convention and Visitors Bureau and saw him with whores provided by the Arkansas State Police), and assuming it were a two party race, he'd get his ass handed to him. |
| Posted by: mcsegeek1 2006-09-26 16:11 |
| #10 Speaking of Monica, wasn't the dude in his fine pointing the finger and anger routine on the "I never had ...". Bill, don't play poker. We know when you're mad you're fibbin. Well, more than usual. |
| Posted by: Angimble Whonter6983 2006-09-26 15:53 |
| #9 I hope you are right Nimble. More Clintons in the White House would just about take me out of the entire process. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2006-09-26 15:52 |
| #8 Besoeker, Clinton would only win if he could again find a fool like Perot, say perhaps McCain, to split the opposition vote for him. Clinton never won a majority of the popular vote, even against the sacrificial GG, Dole. After what came out about Broderick in the second term, I doubt he'd get 40%. Don't let the MSM, which would still give him 95%+, mislead you. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-09-26 15:41 |
| #7 An infuriating set of contradictions are the boomers. I should know, I am one. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-09-26 15:32 |
| #6 If Bill Clinton were to run again tomorrow morning he'd win hands down. He's adored in Europe. Domestic moon bats, social engineers, and the something for nothing crowd is still wildly enthused about him. Most can relate to his BJ in the office antics and could care less. Those that get'em, love em. Those that give'em, share a strange presidential-Monical commaraderie and ladder climbing carrerist self acceptance. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2006-09-26 15:32 |
| #5 OK NS I give ya that one. The Boomers are split, guess they always have been. I alway beat on that generation, maybe I should not. Some great leaders have come from the ranks of the boomers. There sure are some powerful moonbats in their ranks though! |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-09-26 15:16 |
| #4 The generation test fails due to Bush 43. You really don't think he will be a boob like Bubba, do you? The boomer generation is split, as these two demonstrate. But consider that the Gipper was the only "greatest" generation president to finish two full terms. At least the boomers finish what they start, even if you don't like what they start. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-09-26 15:04 |
| #3 Reagan and Clinton. More a story of the greatest generation and the ME generation. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-09-26 14:59 |
| #2 Truly surprised that this was published in the LA Times. Maybe the Tribune's threat to lay them off because of declining circulation and revenues was a cluebat for the editorial staff. |
| Posted by: RWV 2006-09-26 14:27 |
| #1 That was the exact line I said to my girlfriend after we watched the interview: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." |
| Posted by: Mark E. 2006-09-26 13:29 |