You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq: Insurgents Provide Breakdown Of Attacks
2006-10-03
(AKI) - Some 790 victims - among them US soldiers, Iraqi policemen and members of the Shiite militias - have been killed by al-Qaeda in Iraq and its allies since June, the groups boast in a bloody balance sheet posted to the Internet on Monday. The Council of the Mujahadeen, which groups some eight Sunni insurgent groups, including al-Qaeda in Iraq, offers a precise breakdown of casualties inflicted, from 8 June, the day that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed, to 23 September in what they refer to as "Operation Blood Vengeance for Abu Musab."

That 'mission' concluded last week with the message from Abu Ayyub al-Masri, al-Zarqawi's successor. Al-Masri announced the launch of a new 'campaign' for the Muslim holy month of Ramadan entitled "Operation Outright Victory". The figures are invariably exaggerated for propaganda purposes, analysts believe, but give an idea of the commitment of the Iraqi insurgency groups on the ground.

They claim to have killed 390 'crusader' soldiers (from US and other foreign contingents) 270 'apostates' (Iraqi policemen and soldiers) and 130 Shiite militiamen from the Al-Mahdi Army as well as 23 from the Badr brigades. Most of these victims were caused by 35 suicide bombers in action during this period, while 95 were reportedly struck by snipers. Al-Qaeda also claims to have destroyed during this period 152 armoured vehicles, seven tanks, 12 trucks and eight cars used by the multinational contingent.
Posted by:Fred

#4  Wow in 3 1/2 months, the mujaheedin destroyed 1/4th of a heavy division's armour. Wow. Just wow. Guess Woodward is right. Bush has been hiding casualties from the voters. Another year of this and all the Americans in Iraq will have been killed at least twice over. Wow.
Posted by: ed   2006-10-03 09:09  

#3  convert the 790 victims to "Iraqi muslim civilians" and you'd be closer to the truth. Boy that's some score card! Gonna really endear yourselves with the population.....explain again why you're hiding "because of the overwhelming love and support of the people you're 'liberating'"?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-03 08:52  

#2  Snease -- You've posted this "Sunni card" thingy several times. On every occasion, including this one, it has made no sense to me.

The first sentence makes sense, of course, and is no surprise to anyone here - we get it. Money, oil money, is what brought these cretins back to life.

The second section is where the clarity goes *poof*. Let's step through it...

1) Taking down the Shia regime in Iran "discredits" Saudi Wahhabi (Sunni) jihadism? Is that what you're trying to say? How? Why? Clarify.

2) The Us hasn't been able to play both Shia and Sunni cards since 79? Huh? I presume you're referring to the Tehran embassy takeover, and the Shia having Khomeini back from exile to lead them in idiocy... Are you trying to say we haven't been able to play them off against each other since then? Explain - it's just noise. AFAICS.

3) Given a forced choice, the Sunnis could both deliver support and then help moves against Sunni terrorists. Geez. That just makes no sense.

4) I don't trust any of them, but the Sunni-card is the best play. Play? I have no idea what you're trying to say.

If you don't care to post clearly what you mean by this Sunni card stuff, then you're just wasting space every time you repeat it. I understand the players quite well. I'll understand your meaning when you state it clearly.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-03 05:20  

#1  The terrorist's secret weapon in Iraq is: cash. Iranian and Saudi terror financiers have no problem in smuggling sufficient funds into Iraq, for use in bribing poorly paid government officials.

It is my belief that neutralizing Iran would discredit Saudi jihadism. The US hasn't been able to play both the Sunni and Shiite cards since 1979. Given a forced choice, the Sunnis could both deliver support and then help moves against Sunni terrorists. I don't trust any of them, but the Sunni-card is the best play.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-10-03 04:45  

00:00