You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Appeals Court Blocks Ariz. Voter ID Law
2006-10-06
PHOENIX (AP) - A federal appellate court has blocked the enforcement of an Arizona law that requires voters to show identification before casting a ballot and submit proof of citizenship when registering to vote. The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday came a month before the Nov. 7 general election, and just before Monday's deadline to register. The law had already been used for the Sept. 12 primary and in some municipal elections.
Ninth Circus does it again. Any legitimate voter have trouble on Sept. 12th?
The 2004 law requires that voters at polling places produce government-issued picture ID or two pieces of other non-photo identification specified by the law. Other parts of the law dealt with ineligibility of illegal immigrants to receive some government services and benefits.

Critics said that the law would disenfranchise voters, particularly minorities and the elderly, and that requiring voters to acquire and produce identification would be burdensome in time, money and effort.

State Attorney General Terry Goddard said in a statement that he plans to ask the full 9th Circuit Court or the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the decision. Secretary of State Jan Brewer, who has defended the law as a protection against voter fraud, said she hopes the decision is reversed ``very quickly.'' ``I'm very concerned about the confusion that this potentially will create in the upcoming election, with the retraining of all the poll workers and the re-education of the public so close to Nov. 7,'' Brewer said.

The law has been challenged in federal court by groups including the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, the League of Women Voters, the Navajo Nation, the Arizona Civil Liberties Union, the Arizona Advocacy Network and the Mexican-American Legal and Educational Fund.
All the usual suspects.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Crusader - the 9th circus has no interest in upholding democracy. They are the elite and rule by decree. They are the nobility.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-10-06 18:36  

#3  This ruling is an absolute disgrace. How can democracy present itself as the "will of the people" if there are not adequate safeguards in place to ensure that voice isn't squelched by those that would cheat the polls?
Posted by: Crusader   2006-10-06 18:01  

#2  The court system has been subverted by leftists. It no longer balances our system of laws. It distorts it. When direct mandates of the people, like state ballot initiatives are overturned, this is a disruption of democracy. Nothing should be more sacred than a direct mandate of the voting populace. They pay the taxes to keep the system running. This judicial system needs a complete overhaul. It is absolutely foolish to allow one simpleton in robes to bring to a halt our entire sytem of law and order.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-10-06 13:07  

#1  In case anybody hasn't been paying attention for the last 30 years or so, the PRIMARY reason you need to vote Conservative is because of Judicial appointments.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-10-06 09:10  

00:00