You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Pelosi says she would drain GOP 'swamp'
2006-10-07
The Dhimmi Swamp would be maintained for its ecological importance since it is the only known vector for several species of creatures.
Franklin Roosevelt had his first hundred days.
Oooh, how dramatic.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi is thinking 100 hours, time enough, she says, to begin to "drain the swamp" after more than a decade of Republican rule.
She has a "plan".
As in the first 100 hours the House meets after Democrats — in her fondest wish — win control in the Nov. 7 midterm elections and Pelosi takes the gavel as the first Madam Speaker in history.
Wow, you mean she'll give up the bullwhip?
Day One: Put new rules in place to "break the link between lobbyists and legislation."
This evokes a howl of giggles. I'm thinking it means she'll change her phone number.
Day Two: Enact all the recommendations made by the commission that investigated the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Note she doesn't say which "commission", lol.
Time remaining until 100 hours: Raise the minimum wage to $7.25 an hour, maybe in one step. Cut the interest rate on student loans in half. Allow the government to negotiate directly with the pharmaceutical companies for lower drug prices for Medicare patients.
Not Big Gov't, nay, we're talking Hufreakinmongous Gov't - and proud of it! Socialism here we come!
Broaden the types of stem cell research allowed with federal funds — "I hope with a veto-proof majority," she added in an Associated Press interview Thursday.
I think it's clear she's not up to speed on the efficacy of stem cell therapies...
All the days after that: "Pay as you go," meaning no increasing the deficit, whether the issue is middle class tax relief, health care or some other priority.
Great Frickin' Lie #1?
To do that, she said, Bush-era tax cuts would have to be rolled back for those above "a certain level." She mentioned annual incomes of $250,000 or $300,000 a year and higher, and said tax rates for those individuals might revert to those of the Clinton era. Details will have to be worked out, she emphasized.
Yep. Are you hard working and successful in life? Then we'll fuck you. Hard. Ayn Rand weeps, spins.
"We believe in the marketplace," Pelosi said of Democrats, then drew a contrast with Republicans. "They have only rewarded wealth, not work."
Except for the marketplace of the voting booth and legitimate registered voters.
"We must share the benefits of our wealth" beyond the privileged few, she added.
And we'll decide who gets it, of course, in a "special" session in William Jefferson's basement.
Pelosi, 66, has been a leader of the House Democrats since 2002. But her political apprenticeship dates to childhood, when her father was mayor of Baltimore.
She's never had a real job. It's a family tradition.
Now, her political base is about as liberal as it gets, San Francisco. It's a fact that Republicans love to emphasize to voters who might want to visit, but not feel comfortable living there.
It's like a whole 'nuther country.
Republicans find her an attractive political target, and recently said she would try to "cut-and-run" from Iraq while "launching bitter partisan investigations" of the Bush administration, possibly including impeachment hearings.
As has been stated by several of the DhimmiDonk "leaders".
A grandmother five times over, Pelosi pops chocolates, shuns coffee and flashes her wit. Asked what offices should would occupy if in the Capitol if she becomes speaker, she laughed. "I'll have any suite I want."
The trappings of power and those who know how to wield it.
She would, too.
Lol. Duh.
"If the election were held today we'd be successful," Pelosi predicted, claiming that her party's prospects are expanding as the campaign enters its final month. "So many other races are emerging right now," she said.
But it won't be today. It will be in a few weeks. We'll see. We may even weep. But not today, Nancy.
Democrats must gain 15 seats to regain the majority they lost in 1994, and have candidates in competitive races for 30 or so Republican-held seats, according to strategists in both parties. By contrast, only about a handful of Democratic-controlled seats appear ripe for possible Republican takeover.
Wait for it - the experts are often wrong (cuz they're often paid "consultants") and the polls are notorious for bias.
Democrats have a pamphlet that lists all their promises and have run through several slogans in the past year or so as they test campaign messages. In recent days, Pelosi said, their prospects have improved by the discovery that former Republican Rep. Mark Foley (news, bio, voting record) of Florida had sent sexually explicit computer messages to teenage male pages.
Kinda like judge shopping, only less sincere.
Not long before sitting down for a lunchtime interview, she turned down a suggestion from Speaker Dennis Hastert that they jointly appoint former FBI Director Louie Freeh to recommend improvements in the page program.
Cooperate? What do you take me for, a citizen?
"That was about protecting their majority" rather than the pages, she said dismissively.
We smell blood in the water...
Instead, she wants to put Hastert and other Republicans under oath and make them say what they knew of Foley's actions, when they learned it and what they did to stop him.
Yet she has refused to go under oath herself.
The potential for political gain is clear to her.
Blood. I smell blood!
"It's an opportunity for growth among women" for the Democrats, she said. "They don't always vote and this could be a motivation."
Issue Shopping.
With married women, in particular, it's a huge issue, she added.
Sale!
Among older voters, too.

"If there's an ethical issue, seniors take a hike" and abandon politicians they blame, she said.

"If we hold onto seniors we win the election."
Yep, seniors are easy, just promise them lots of shit - and let 'em die off while it languishes in committee.
Posted by:.com

#34  Predatory.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-07 22:37  

#33  Cadaverous. Preditory. Unctuous.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-07 22:36  

#32  Wow. This is a great plan. All this great stuff and the government pays for it all! Not me!
I must be as stupid as Nancy Pelosi thinks I am...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-10-07 22:22  

#31  "if civil war breaks out in the US"

This time, the South will win.
Posted by: Poison Reverse   2006-10-07 21:43  

#30  Watch out for them alligators, honey.
Posted by: Gleamp Thuns4298   2006-10-07 21:38  

#29  Rest easy. It's not going to happen. It's just that the MSM wants it to happen so badky that they spend all their time convincing us it will. And it seems as if they are right whenb that's all we hear day in day out. But those who vote will be voting trunk again this year. Not that they deserve the power; but only that not enough voting Americans are stupid enough to elect donks instead.

Low unemployment, falling gas prices, falling deficit, global warming over. What are the positive issues the donks will win on? None, as Pelosi's rant reveals.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-10-07 19:16  

#28  the originator of civilian-enforcement at the border was the mid 90's effort here in San Diego: "Light Up The Night". Multitudes of citizens fed up with the inaction of the Fed Gov't on the border drove their vehicles and with their headlights, illuminated the flood coming across. This shamed the Feds and local BP's to take it seriously enough. We need to keep this oversight up. Dem or Rep, it's a permanent election issue for the next 50 yrs. "how do you stand, Congressman/Senator, and what about 'these' votes?"
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-07 19:00  

#27  a swarm? I think not. Not a live one

A Dem-controlled government would come down on the side of preventing you/us from preventing the swarm, I think.

Ack. I need to go exercise or something and not dwell on the election possibilities for the moment.

I'm not a registered Republican, but I am hoping and praying that the Dems do not seize control of Congress this year. I haven't felt this strongly about an election in decades.
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-07 18:29  

#26  I take that back. Yes, I am pessimistic.

Despite the size of the Muslim world, the West could deal with the Islmofascists easily if there were any real will to do so.

It is the lack of that will in so many that has me pessimistic.

RE: domestic politics,

her political apprenticeship dates to childhood, when her father was mayor of Baltimore.


Not exactly a shining beacon of civic rectitude, the Bal'mer city government. I didn't know of her connection before but it explains a lot about her attitudes and actions.

Posted by: lotp   2006-10-07 18:27  

#25  a swarm? I think not. Not a live one
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-07 18:26  

#24  Feeling pessimistic, Ms. Lotp?

Not entirely, no.

But I do think the point is valid that if a civil war breaks out in the US, the left will have millions of bodies swarming our borders to help, and other countries may well provide tacit if not overt aid to them as well.
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-07 18:23  

#23  wow - that's highbrow - I'm listening to Greenday, AudioSlave and Neil Young
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-07 18:21  

#22   But Dems reject the individual, and see only vote-bots defined by abstract socioeconomic data. That's how leftists treat us as college students, as "news consumers," and as citizens. Piss. Me. Off.

x-Jag, don't forget body counts and the coffin photos the donks have an affinity for. Hell, let's not consider the mission, right donks?
Posted by: Captain America   2006-10-07 18:10  

#21  It's a shame when something that once was pretty good dies. It's time to bury the carcass, and the maggots feeding on it. The REAL Democratic party is dead. In its place is the most socialistic, dictatorial piece of crap ever seen in the United States. I think I'll make another hundred darts for my crossbow - I think I'll need 'em.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-10-07 17:59  

#20  Feeling pessimistic, Ms. Lotp?
Right now, I have tv in the background, with lci all-night live coverage the "nuits blanches" parisian bobo festival, from the heavily islamized "Goutte d'or" Paris area.
Leitmotiv of this festival is, you guessed it, the "métissage" (interbreeding, in the cultural sense here), with arab and african "modern artists" presenting their performances on this very topic one after the other... and in the commercial, what is the Mozart CD we're offered? "Mozart the egyptian", Ie Mozart arranged middle-east style.
I'm not very upbeat too. I'll switch to Cartoon Network, watching Bugs Bunny or Johnny Bravo in english will cheer me up.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-10-07 17:52  

#19  If there ever is a civil war in the US it won't be just Red vs Blue. The Blues will get plenty help from outside. Think about it. It's your enemies' wet dream.

They already are getting such aid, in the form of money, press support and other help. If this goes to open violence, the floodgates will indeed open I suspect. And I am not at all sure the authorities will use force to end it while they still are able to do so.

We have what? 5000 linear miles of undefended borders?
Posted by: lotp   2006-10-07 17:43  

#18  Anyone who votes for holier-than-thou petty tyrant shitbags like these deserves a sharp kick in the nads.

Can we assume that you'll be following that up with a strongly worded letter?

Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2006-10-07 17:39  

#17  If the LLLs ever try to secede, we'll be able to just starve them out. (Don't forget, the military is 85% red)

If there ever is a civil war in the US it won't be just Red vs Blue. The Blues will get plenty help from outside. Think about it. It's your enemies' wet dream.
Posted by: Bob   2006-10-07 14:45  

#16  Seriously, GORT. I am not my gender, ethnicity, or demographic. But Dems reject the individual, and see only vote-bots defined by abstract socioeconomic data. That's how leftists treat us as college students, as "news consumers," and as citizens. Piss. Me. Off. Anyone who votes for holier-than-thou petty tyrant shitbags like these deserves a sharp kick in the nads.
Posted by: exJAG   2006-10-07 13:56  

#15  There won't be any Civil War. If you look at the 2004 election map of the US (by county), even the blue states have small islands of blue in a sea of red. The blue islands are cities. If the LLLs ever try to secede, we'll be able to just starve them out. (Don't forget, the military is 85% red)

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-10-07 13:50  

#14  Nancy...Are you going to drain the Kennedy's with you? You can let any of them drive.
Posted by: anymouse   2006-10-07 13:18  

#13  I never called it a swamp, but, Pelosi can start out by draining mine.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-10-07 13:03  

#12  Raise the minimum wage... Cut the interest rate ... Allow the government...

Hey, what about my pony?
Posted by: SteveS   2006-10-07 11:58  

#11  re: the icky GOP swamp thingy

1) I promise to designate all Homo Bath Houses as American Historical treasures.

Posted by: Nancy Pelosi   2006-10-07 10:03  

#10  Don't hold back exJAG. Tell me how you really feel :)
Posted by: GORT   2006-10-07 09:31  

#9  Pelosi says she would drain GOP 'swamp'

Forgot the old adage about being Ass-Deep in Aligators, didn't you.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-10-07 09:05  

#8  Crushing the Muhammadan motherfuckers shooting at our husbands is a "huge issue with married women" too, ya commie skank.
Posted by: exJAG   2006-10-07 08:28  

#7  All the days after that: "Pay as you go," meaning no increasing the deficit, whether the issue is middle class tax relief, health care or some other priority.

.com correctly called this passage a lie, and it is also worth noting how deftly the writer expresses Pelosi's intent on raising taxes by calling a tax increase the issue of "middle class tax relief...."

BTW this writer has been accussed a lot of left wing bias in his reportage, and it show with this feature.
Posted by: badanov   2006-10-07 04:14  

#6  If the "Spanish" variant comes into play, France will get nuked if it takes in any of the fleeing scumbags, as will any other country offering them refuge. If the US does ever split like that, the result will be slaughter and mayhem of biblical proportions, due to the social pressures and tensions that have built up over the years.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-10-07 03:38  

#5  Pelosi makes me want to puke, but then so do most other Democrats. We're headed for another Civil War except this time it will be Spanish Civil War style. The Right will win this time, too, and Pelosi will probably end up in France just like the Spanish Commies did.
Posted by: mac   2006-10-07 02:23  

#4  It's not a swamp - it's wet land lol! Now that's beating them at their own game. I guess they will just have to live with the smarmy mess - but then, they seem to like doing that.
Posted by: anon   2006-10-07 01:54  

#3  It's not a swamp - it's wet land.
Posted by: Super Hose   2006-10-07 01:50  

#2  DemoLefties win the Congress in 2006 then Der Waffen SovietReich StaatWeldFrau POTUS = COPOTUS Hillary in 2008 > USA under OWG + anti-Amer Amer Communism-Socialism + US-BASED UNO PEACEKEEPING = INVASION/OCCUPATION ARMY 2015-2020, as per the Left's own timeline.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-10-07 01:23  

#1  drain the swamp, seems I've heard that line b-4
Posted by: Captain America   2006-10-07 01:01  

00:00