You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Secret Service questions teen girl, 14, for 'Kill Bush' MySpace page
2006-10-13
Hey, Julia, how do you like this Civics lesson?
The latest Sacramento resident to be questioned by federal agents in possible threats against President Bush is a 14-year-old girl with a heart on her backpack and braces on her teeth, a freckle-nosed adolescent who is passionate about liberal politics and cute movie stars.

Her name is Julia Wilson, and she learned a vivid civics lesson Wednesday when two Secret Service agents pulled her out of biology class at McClatchy High School to ask about comments and images she posted on MySpace.

Beneath the words "Kill Bush," Julia posted a cartoonish photo-collage of a knife stabbing the hand of the president. It was one of a few images Julia said she used to decorate an anti-Bush Web page she moderated on MySpace, the social networking Web site that is hugely popular among teenagers.

The Secret Service refused to answer questions about the case or even confirm an investigation. Eric Zahren, a Secret Service spokesman, said the agency does not discuss its work "due to the sensitivity of our mission."

But Julia's mother, Kirstie Wilson, and an assistant principal at McClatchy High said two agents showed them badges stating they were with the Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security.

Federal law prohibits making serious threats against the president, and Julia and her parents say what she did was wrong.

The couple are disturbed, however, that federal agents questioned a child at school -- without her parents present. And First Amendment lawyers question whether the Secret Service over-reacted to a 14-year-old's comments on a Web site made for casual socializing.

"I don't condone what she did, but it seems a little over the top to me," said Julia's father, Jim Moose. "You'd think they could look at the situation and determine that she's not a credible threat."

Earlier this month, federal officials arrested two Sacramento-area men for allegedly threatening the president. Elk Grove resident Michael Lee Braun has been charged with sending two threatening letters to the El Dorado Hills country club where Bush recently made an appearance. Rocklin resident Howard J. Kinsey is accused of threatening the president through a text message.

Here is how Julia Wilson's family tells their story:

Two Secret Service agents arrived at their Land Park home about 2:30 Wednesday afternoon, Kirstie Wilson said. They told her they wanted to speak with her daughter about threats to the president that she had posted on MySpace.

"She was in molecular biology, and I said I really didn't want to take her out of class for this," Kirstie Wilson said. "I said I'd make sure she came right home from school."

She asked the agents to come back in an hour, and they left.

Then Wilson sent her daughter a text message instructing her to come straight home from school.

"... there are two men from the secret service that want to talk with you. Apparently you made some death threats against president bush. Dont worry youre not going to jail or anything like that but they take these things very seriously these days," Kirstie Wilson wrote.

"Are you serious!?!? omg. Am I in a lot of trouble"? her daughter replied, using common teenage shorthand for "Oh, my God."

Kirstie Wilson called her husband. While they were on the phone, she received another text message from her daughter: "They took me out of class."

It was a 15- to 20-minute interview, Julia said. Agents asked her about her father's job, her e-mail address, and her Social Security number. They asked about the MySpace page she had created last year as an eighth-grader at Sutter Middle School.

"I told them I just really don't agree with Bush's politics," Julia said Thursday. "I don't have any plans of harming Bush in any way. I'm very peaceful; I just don't like Bush."

The MySpace page under question was a group page, similar to an online club.

Most of the groups Julia is a part of are fan clubs for movie stars like Jake Gyllenhaal and Ewan McGregor. The group that got her in trouble was called something like "People who want to stab Bush" -- Julia said she doesn't remember the exact name because she soon changed it.

After an eighth-grade history lesson in which she learned that threatening the president is against the law, Julia said she changed the group name to "So Bush is an idiot but hey what else is new?"

The group primarily consisted of her teenage friends who share her liberal political interests, Julia said. She deleted the group page over the summer when she decided that MySpace was juvenile and taking up too much time.

Moose and Wilson say they had no idea what their daughter had posted online.

"I was more than happy to have them talk to her about the severity of what she did. But I wanted to be here with her," Kirstie Wilson said.

McClatchy Assistant Principal Paul Belluomini said he usually does not notify parents when law enforcement officials come to school to interview students.

"Parents usually interfere with an investigation, so we usually don't notify them until it's done," he said.

Sacramento City Unified School District policy calls for parents to be notified but doesn't say whether it should happen before or after a student is interviewed. State law doesn't require parental notification.

In any case, said Ann Brick, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, Julia Wilson's post did not sound like a "true threat" to the president, making it political speech that is protected by the First Amendment.

"The courts have to distinguish between political rhetoric and hyperbole and a real threat," Brick said. "A reasonable person would have to interpret what was said as indication of a serious intent to commit harm."

Peter Scheer, executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition, said in the current political climate, "the threshold that brings (agents) in has gotten lower."

"It's a cautionary tale for kids who are on MySpace that putting something on MySpace like 'Kill the President' is not the same as saying it on e-mail or over the phone," Scheer said. "The government is not systematically listening to all phone calls or going through e-mails, but it probably does search the Internet."
Posted by:mcsegeek1

#36  The editor of the Lancet was one of the main speakers at an "anti-war" rally the other day, along with MP George Galloway. He isn't exactly an unbiased scientist, disinterestedly seeking the truth.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-10-13 23:43  

#35  Dobry Vecher Comrade Moon!
Even 1 is too many! Learn from your mistakes occupiers of England! 1 death is a tragedy, 52 deaths is a statistic! How many more must die before the occupation of the Cliffs of Dover ends? Learn from example, occupiers of Celtic soil. Anglo-Saxons out of Britain!
Posted by: ed   2006-10-13 23:18  

#34  JD - You are correct. I had seen it posted all over the place in several reputable publishers, however, they are all based on the same study. Thanks for correcting me. Still, even 6 lives for a lie is too many.
Posted by: Moonbat   2006-10-13 22:54  

#33  The "survey" was done by the same folks who did the 100,000 (95% confidence interval about 200,000) dead Iraqis just before the 2004 elections. They even admitted doing it to influence the US elections, and what do you know, it's election time again. Too bad the Lancet has morphed from a respected medical journal to a propaganda outlet.
Posted by: ed   2006-10-13 22:45  

#32  Yes I see ... Iraqi Doctors.
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 22:42  

#31  "The study, published by The Lancet, was based on a survey of 1,849 households at 47 random locations in Iraq this summer. A team of Iraqi doctors asked heads of households how many members had lost their lives in the year before the invasion in March 2003 and then in the three subsequent years."

Who conducted this survey ?
Who took thhem around dangerous Iraq where it is unsafe to travel freely due to the rampant killing?
Do they speak or read Arabic ?
Can they really tell a death certificate from a report card ?
Where do the Iraqis get these death certificates ?
How do you know that they are telling the truth ?
Maybe the Iraqis thought they were going to be awarded damagge claims and inflated the number .
etc,
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 22:40  

#30  Just the fat in your fat western skin would feed a 1000 Courageous Korean Comrades for a week. Your bone marrow alone would make 100 liters of Juche soup for our comrades who are in the peak of health with just a timbleful a day and 1 leaf of kimchi.
Posted by: Pravda   2006-10-13 22:33  

#29  Cheez buddy I know YOU didn't make it up.
I looked at the link:
"Survey suggests violent death rate in Iraq is now running at one every three minutes "

Survey Says: Family Feud Science.
I do not believe thyat the methods used to cinduct this survey were unbiased and I do believe that the saps who conducted it were flat snookered.
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 22:31  

#28  JD - The number in my last post is a link. When my number was questioned I went to look it up and see if I had, in fact, dropped a decimal. Upon further research I found multiple links with that number. Try it. Google "655,000 lives lost in Iraq" and see what you get. Thanks for the input.

Tu3031- Thanks for the name.

Pravda - I'm not fat, but I'll work on that.
Posted by: Moonbat   2006-10-13 22:26  

#27  Counterrevolutionary splittist! The Central Committee, after Scientific Socialist Survey, has determined exactly 6,552,643 Iraqis have been killed in the last 24 hours by bloodthirsty, drug addled, over sexed, over here American female soldiers alone. To question the authority of the Central Committee is to volunteer for Reeducation Camp!
Posted by: Pravda   2006-10-13 22:22  

#26  Hey moonbat - whats a few zeros here and there between friends right?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-10-13 22:19  

#25  655,000 does not compute.

I am no math wiz but during the summer when things were the hottest, the figure given was 100 Irqis killled per day. Mind you, not killed by American or British Soldiers but by "insurgents" and Terrorists.
The war (such as it is) has been on for lets say 1200 days.
So taking the only figure that has been reportted as a HIGH number and doing the math that would be 120,000 dead and frankly no one believes that either.
The supposed 655,000 is not credible.
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 22:19  

#24  6.55 million? That is not the figures I have. 655,000
Posted by: Moonbat   2006-10-13 22:09  

#23  Moonbat equates Bush with Hitler...film at eleven.
Posted by: tu3031   2006-10-13 21:57  

#22  It's 6.55 million, you fat capitalist pig!
Posted by: Pravda   2006-10-13 21:56  

#21  #7 Old Spook - you take all the FUN out of it!

Makes sense to me!
Posted by: Bobby   2006-10-13 21:34  

#20  655,000 lives lost in a war searching for WMD vs 14 yr old girl with a cartoon. By the way, WMD-Weapon of Mass Deception. While I don't know anyone willing I don't know anyone who would mourn either. Many people tried to get rid of Hitler too.
Posted by: Hupolurong Speater5008   2006-10-13 21:33  

#19  Heck, we were taught in elementary school that you cannot threaten to kill the president in any written form. And I went to a government school!
Posted by: Broadhead6   2006-10-13 21:23  

#18  See also RENSE.com/NETSCAPE > DAVE HERMAN > HOW AND WHY I HELPED BLEW UP THE WTC.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-10-13 21:19  

#17   I'm very peaceful;

A little hard to square this statement with advocating the murder of the President. Or has the meaning of 'peaceful' changed recently?
Posted by: SteveS   2006-10-13 21:14  

#16  hmmm.... I used to spell better.
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 19:58  

#15  Yeah well, even Moonbats should have some sense.
And they don't.
And it's driving me crazy.
Someone taught this child that this kind of disrespectful smut amounted to some kind of political speach, and PEACEFUL political speach at that.
It boggles the mind.
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 19:36  

#14  #13: "What is wrong with her parents?"

See comment #6 of this post, J.D.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-10-13 19:27  

#13  WTF ever happened to Social Studies and basic citizenship ?

What is wrong with her parents ?
Posted by: J.D. Lux   2006-10-13 19:18  

#12  Book 'er, Danno.
Posted by: Steve McGarrett   2006-10-13 18:51  

#11  "...and I said I really didn't want to take her out of class for this"

C'mon now...my daughter has a mid-term exam comming up. It's not like it's a federal crime or something...oh what...it is?
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-10-13 18:47  

#10  "I don't condone what she did, but it seems a little over the top to me," said Julia's father, Jim Moose. "You'd think they could look at the situation and determine that she's not a credible threat."

Hey, Dipstick, what's "over the top" is your moron daughter's stoopid behavior. In an age where filmakers see nothing wrong with portraying the assassination of a democratically elected sitting president, this sort of shit has got to be curtailed. The Secret Service were just doing their job and doing it well.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-10-13 16:58  

#9  I don't know what they are doing to the kids at McClatchy but how many 8th or 9th graders are into politics? "Moose and Wilson say they had no idea what their daughter had posted online." Idiot parents, I bet she has a computer in her room too.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-10-13 16:49  

#8  BTW - miss "thick as a brick" of teh ACLU - the way to determine the threat is harmless is to interview her. The truncheons and electrodes are for serious Bush-haters (you'll soon see...heh heh). They did their job, and your knee jerked correspondingly. All is right in the world, except for little Miss Wilson, an eighth grader with BDS. She's destined to be an underachieving Cat-lady with few friends and a lotta societal angst. Future librarian. Good job by the parents. Bet they voted Kerry-Edwards? $100? Who's taking?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-13 16:48  

#7  They were verifying that it was HER website and HER images and HER eidting, not her father or an adult using her as a beard.

THAT is why there is no first amendment issue nor any issue about her being questioned without her parents present. A threat was presented, and this wa srequired to see if the trheat was genuine, credible and what the exact source was.


Posted by: Oldspook   2006-10-13 16:43  

#6  If someone set up a "Kill Julia" page I wonder how she'd respond?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles in Blairistan   2006-10-13 16:39  

#5  14 yr old in "molecular biology"? I smell Bullshit. She's a pampered little shit, and got a lesson in consequences
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-13 16:39  

#4  My crystal ball sees an Ivy League future for Julia. They're probably fighting over her scholarship right now...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-10-13 15:49  

#3  And First Amendment lawyers question whether the Secret Service over-reacted to a 14-year-old's comments on a Web site made for casual socializing.

...And how old were the little bas*ards who have gleefully shot up school after school? IIRC, some were still in elementary school.
The agents did exactly what they were supposed to do. When a 14-year-old discovers she's pissed off the Federal Government - especially for somthing this thoroughly stupid - Mommy and Daddy should NOT be there. She should face the hornet's nest she's stirred up all by her lonesome.

Mik
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-10-13 15:34  

#2  But what are they supposed to do? Ignore it?

And then it turns out that the supposed giggly 14-year old is a bearded 44-year old who used the MySpace site as the hub for an assassination conspiracy?

Besides a threat to kill anyone is a felony.
Posted by: Dreadnought   2006-10-13 15:30  

#1  Well, at least she wasn't arrested, but I thought secret Service guys had better things to do. Still, I hope she'll understand the civic lesson here, though I really doubt the experience made her love GWB more...
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-10-13 15:19  

00:00