You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Rove foresees GOP victory
2006-10-18
White House political strategist Karl Rove yesterday confidently predicted that the Republican Party would hold the House and the Senate in next month's elections, dismissing fallout from the sex scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley.

At a luncheon with editors and reporters at The Washington Times, Mr. Rove -- who is widely credited as the architect of the party's historic 2002 midterm election gains -- said Republicans are beginning to make significant headway in defining their party's differences from congressional Democrats, especially on national security. "I'm confident we're going to keep the Senate; I'm confident we're going to keep the House. The Foley matter has impact in some limited districts, but the research we have shows that people are differentiating between a vote for their congressman and a member from Florida," Mr. Rove said, referring to the Republican who resigned last month after his sexually explicit online messages to former congressional pages were discovered.

President Bush has begun to paint this year's election as a choice between strength and weakness on national security -- and the stark differences will show Americans the true nature of Democrats, Mr. Rove said. "It is useful to remind people what [Democrats] said and what they do. I think they have given us here, especially in the last couple of weeks, a potent set of votes to talk about. You had 90 percent of House Democrats voting against the terrorist-surveillance program, nearly three-quarters of Senate Democrats and 80 percent of House Democrats voting against the terrorist-interrogation act. Something is fundamentally flawed."
Posted by:.com

#11  From .com's second article:

Much of the fighting stems from a project launched in April by Hillary Clinton advisor Harold Ickes... Some.. have suggested that it is actually an attempt by the 2008 Hillary campaign to sidestep the national organizationÂ’s apparatus entirely, a charge that Catalist insiders dismiss out of hand.

FWIW, Ickes (and to a lesser extent, HRC) were networking and establishing fundraising contacts out here on the West Coast as far back as 2003.

Posted by: Pappy   2006-10-18 22:05  

#10  But ask yourself: What is left of the donks when they lose yet again?
Posted by: Captain America   2006-10-18 19:47  

#9  Rove foresees GOP victory, and so do I.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-10-18 19:46  

#8  Geez, 'Moose - did Lord Rove (VBUH) give you permission let the Dems in on the secret speak?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-10-18 19:38  

#7  Rove has a great big calculator. First of all, the republicans got to gerrymander after the last census, and that solidifies a lot of contentious seats.

Second, the republicans have a seasoned national organization and strong State organizations. Howard Dean has had to abandoned a national strategy in favor of rebuilding State parties that were utterly collapsed. These new party orgs are untried and weak.

Third, the democrat senatorial committee is screaming for money so much that Dean has reluctantly ordered the DNC to go into debt for $5-10M. On the up side, they may be trying to reinforce potential wins; on the down side, they may be reinforcing defeat--a terrible tactic.

Fourth, lots of the big names in the party are preparing for the 2008 presidentials; this is putting them at each others' throats trying to get backers and money.

Hillary is actively undercutting Dean by telling the party deep pocket contributors to give the money to her, not the party, so that she can dole it out in exchange for 2008 support.

Several wealthy candidates are running against very strong republican seats. Democrats like Lamont vs. Lieberman and Pederson in Arizona are wasting millions of dollars on lost causes, money that could have mattered in a dozen other races.

Even the biggest names are divided and contentious. Some are refusing to give to the party as long as Dean is in charge. Others have created an organization that only supports radical candidates.

In other words, the democrat party is a friggin' mess heading into this election. In the last few weeks, some of these pollsters are most likely going to think they've lost their minds.

And meanwhile, deep in his lair of solitude, we hear the voice of Karl Rove: "BWAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-10-18 18:21  

#6  That's OK - the Dem's contingency plan if they lose is to claim conspiracy and election fraud.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-10-18 18:12  

#5  And another:
Angry Data Nerds Rain on Democratic Parade
Posted by: .com   2006-10-18 15:53  

#4  Something interesting to gnaw on. Via PowerLine.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-18 13:51  

#3  "I want some of what he's smoking."

Great! You'll find some in the voting booth.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-10-18 12:13  

#2  I want some of what he's smoking.
Posted by: JAB   2006-10-18 10:44  

#1  And Ed Koch dismisses the Foley "scandal"...
Posted by: .com   2006-10-18 10:43  

00:00