You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
'Assad regime is on brink of collapse'
2006-10-23
An exiled former Syrian vice president said Sunday that President Bashar Assad's regime is on the brink of collapse and called on Syrians to prepare for the day when he will be overthrown. Abdul-Halim Khaddam, who is wanted in Syria on treason charges, said in an address to the Syrian people that Assad's "oppressive" regime will soon be replaced with a democratic civil government, but he did not elaborate.
"After six years of his taking over the administration of the country, what has Bashar Assad done except spread corruption, increase suffering and make wrong decisions that have led to weakening national unity and subjecting Syria to Arab and international isolation."


His address was on the occasion of Eid al-Fitr, the Islamic feast marking the end of the fasting month of Ramadan, and was broadcast on Lebanon's Future TV, an anti-Syrian station owned by the family of slain former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. "Ask yourselves, my brothers, after six years of his taking over the administration of the country, what has Bashar Assad done except spread corruption, increase suffering and (take) wrong decisions that have led to weakening national unity and subjecting Syria to Arab and international isolation," Khaddam said. "I assure you that the corrupt and tyrannical regime is on the brink of collapse and in the near future, the ruler will see the opportunists and hypocrites that rallied around him fleeing. He and his corrupt family and entourage will find themselves in the hands of justice," he added.
Posted by:Fred

#2  But...but...but...the opposition is Islamofascist, specifically: Muslim Brotherhood terrorists. In September, Condi Rice hinted at new relations between the US and Sunni majority states. Given the Saudi hate for Persian Shiites, they would probably move to turn Syria against Iran. That would require both the removal of Assad and US acceptance of a new Baathist regime. The Saudis and Egyptians, etc would like to see moves against the Brotherhood, Hizbollah and al-Qaeda suspects that Assad has tolerated.

I think the above is somewhat in the plans of the Bush administration, but would require breaking down of reluctant parties and: elimination of the Ahmadinejad tyranny. A huge US fleet is moving toward the Persian Gulf. Around 80,000 or more Rapid Deployment Forces could shift to the Iraq Theater. But they couldn't do much unless Iran took some huge hits that smart bombs couldn't touch. In the 19th century, England controlled the Straits of Hormuz. An Anglo-American force has to repeat that policy, and depopulate some north Gulf regions, of any potential hostiles. The south is already somewhat in control of friendlies. We would have to look the other way, when the Saudis finally move against their own Arab Shiites. The above will not likely play out in that exact manner, but there can be no scenario that permits the Ayatollahs to continue their savage and aggressive rule in Iran.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-10-23 02:56  

#1  Yeah, sure. Iran and North Korea are on the brink, too.

Amazing how long a country can sit on the brink and continue to do enormous damage.
Posted by: Jackal   2006-10-23 00:25  

00:00