You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Voters Approve Panama Canal Expansion
2006-10-23
PANAMA CITY, Panama (AP) - Voters overwhelmingly approved the largest modernization plan in the 92-year history of the Panama Canal on Sunday, backing a multi-billion dollar expansion that will allow the world's largest ships to squeeze through the shortcut between the seas.

More than 78 percent of Panamanians voted in favor of the expansion with 94 percent of polling stations counted by the country's electoral tribunal. Almost 57 percent of the country's more than 2.1 million voters did not turn out. Thousands of supporters in green ``Yes'' T-shirts cast ballots endorsing the $5.25 billion overhaul which would allow the canal to handle modern container ships, cruise liners and tankers that are too large for its current 108-foot-wide locks. The plan is to build a third set of locks on the Pacific and Atlantic ends by 2015.

The Panama Canal Authority, the autonomous government agency that runs the canal, says the project will double capacity of a waterway already on pace to generate about $1.4 billion this year. Expansion will be paid for by increasing tolls and take in more than $6 billion annually in revenue by 2025.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Don't mess with Joe SA7708. He controls a good chunk of the Upper Case market, which is curently under attack.

But yeah, we're gonna have to look deep to find trasporation in about 30 or 50 years.
Posted by: Shipman   2006-10-23 18:02  

#6  'Merkins coming back thru the back door?

I read before (mebbe here awhile ago) they don't like the Chicoms, hired US lobbyists to lobby Congress to come back.....

It might be the only way to protect themselves from Hugo's delusions of grandeur.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2006-10-23 12:53  

#5  Joe, I think building more highways is a waste of money. The scare talk about new transcontinental roadways to promote OWG is hardly relevant. Oil will be getting scarcer as the years go by, and promises of new and larger discoveries are so far just pipe dreams. It's unlikely that new and vast sources of power for truck traffic will be discovered in the next century. We might as well build different ways to move stuff around the world. Ships (and trains BTW) are way more efficient than diesel trucks, and they can use widely available alternative power sources.
Posted by: Slaviger Angomong7708   2006-10-23 11:21  

#4  If the photo is an example of the "get out the vote" campaign, then I heartily approve.

Dad was in the Coast Arty in Panama pre war.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-10-23 08:36  

#3  A man. A plan. A canal. Panama.

Or you could just read that backwards.
Posted by: gromky   2006-10-23 05:19  

#2  Fergit to add > IONews, NICARAGUA discovers LE PARIS = EURO-TOURISM.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-10-23 02:56  

#1  As said or indic before, even presuming other nations start it, iff history = histoire' is any measure, America will finish/complete it. CAN ANYONE SAY, "NORTH-SOUTH TRANS-CONTINENTAL HIGHWAY/ROADWAYS BETWEEN NORTH-SOUTH AMERICAS INTO NORTH-SOUTH EURASIA-AUSTRALIA". *FOLLOW THAT INTERNATIONAL-GREENWICH DATELINES BOYZ, D*** IT.
FREEREPUBLIC.com bloggers > "Watch your WalMart [ etal.Mall/Shopping] Bills go down". BUT LIKELY NOT IN OUR GENERATION.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-10-23 02:54  

00:00